Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Doug1]

Hannon
  How would this help 2.8 million starving people to eat? How long would it be before they became 5.6 million? Even if it could help solve the food problem there is no free water generator so at some point you would still be in as bad a shape or worse when you run out of potable water. Just something I was wondering while repairing my pc which was hacked 20 minutes after my last post. Im not bothered by it much it provides a distraction from other things. Forces me to clean my drives.
   

[hanon]

Oh, to build a generator on this principle, look at the illustration. With a three pole rotor, all North pointing out, the stator coils should produce an AC current. Because of the three poles, in operation, when one magnet is leaving a stator, another magnet is approaching the opposite stator. This will produce a combined EMF equal to a standard rotor with a north and south pole. The effect of Lenz's law will still produce a back-torque because the current generated will still oppose the change of the rotor, but because there is no North-South "locking" the rotor to the stator, the running torque will be much smaller. I like to think that this design will show that the back-torque of Lenz's law is really very small.

Antijon,
Could you elaborate a bit deeper your proposal? It seem to be interesting but I can not grasp your idea totally. Thanks. I think Adams motor and others overunity motors also used un-even number of stator coils and rotor magnets.

Doug,
With energy you can access many things. A  small pump in a small village in the middle of Africa may bring water to dry lands far from the river. Or pump water out of a well. Irrigation is much easier with free energy instead of depending on having a working gasoil motor that they can not afford or they do not have access to gasoil in those sites. Also with energy you can boil water and make potable water. Energy is directly related to the development of mankind. Tesla sacrificed money for the better of mankind.

The problem with free energy is that all inventor have sacrified the development of mankind for getting a lot of money. At the end all them have died poor and their designs are buried with them. I think they were not too smart.

[bajac]

Hannon
  How would this help 2.8 million starving people to eat? How long would it be before they became 5.6 million? Even if it could help solve the food problem there is no free water generator so at some point you would still be in as bad a shape or worse when you run out of potable water. Just something I was wondering while repairing my pc which was hacked 20 minutes after my last post. Im not bothered by it much it provides a distraction from other things. Forces me to clean my drives.

Doug,


With such technology people would be able to grow plants in the deserts. The costs of running desalination plants would be ridiculously low. Think about it, potable water everywhere for drinking and growing plants. The Sahara desert can become the biggest garden. And, all of this can be done without adding pollution to the environment.

Sorry! I wrote dessert instead of desert. It might be that I was eating a cake while writing it. Ha ha ha.

[hanon]

From Figuera patent #30378 (Motionless generator) (1902) (textual quote):

" In Gramme ring and in current dynamos, current is produce
by induction produced on the wire of the induced circuits while
its coils cut the lines of force "

........

" The inventors believe that is exactly the same that the induced circuit coils
cut the lines of force, than that these lines of force cross the induced wire. "


Therefore:

1 - Figuera was searching for induction by flux cutting the wires.

2 - How did Figuera get to move laterally the lines of force and cut the induced wire?     ...  I think I know it

For me this is the key of Figuera´s motionless patents: using two electromagnets to move the lines of force forward and backward.

[Doug1]

Hannon
That is only a part of it which is very important in itself. It will not get it to work on its own. The intensity of the magnetic fields produced by the inducers have to be extreamly strong with a minimum of expended current. ie a better magnet. There is another oddity to his drawing in the patent of the motionless unit. The lines which everyone thinks are conductive leads are not leads at all. They show one half of the system running off the source, the N inducers and the other half running off the feed back from the output. It would be like drawing a circle around the respective halves one run off of outside gen and the other off the comutated resistance which also more of abstract notion then a model in the physical sense. Remove the lines going from the different parts to the other parts and start counting up parts and tell me there is not seven coils N seven coils S and seven possible resister connections but 14 commutator segments. The resister contraption is only there to show the device is resistance controlled but it does not exist in the sense of the drawing as a real physical part of the construction. The magnets them selves control the fluctuation and everything ells including rectification.