Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

bajac

RMatt,


Could you be more specific to what embodiments you are referring to?


Bajac

forest

Wooohoooo I think we have solved it !  I mean : lasts posts explain everything !

hanon

Quote from: bajac on August 19, 2013, 12:35:49 PM
Hi all,
After a discussion with one of the forum members, I realized that an explanation is in order. The legacy of Mr. Figuera is that he showed us two methods in his 1902 and 1908 patents for mitigating the effects of the Lenz's law. The 1902 method teaches that the influence of the induced magnetic field can be minimized if the inducing and induced coils are placed symmetrically at an angle of 90 degrees. The requirement for symmetry is important because it is condition that balances the magnetic field entering and leaving the inducing coil (interior), and therefore, it helps on cancelling any induced voltage in the inducing coil (interior coil) due to the reaction of the induced coil (exterior coil).
The second method of 1908, on the other hand, consists in pulling the induced magnetic field ("y" electromagnets) away from the inducing electromagnets ("N" and "S" electromagnets) by applying two voltages 90 degrees out of phase. Even though the 1902 method is much simpler to implement, it is my belief that the 1908 method is more efficient. The reason for being more efficient is that the 1908 method does not suffer any decrease in performance as the load increases. However, a performance degradation can be expected of the 1902 method due to some symmetry loss whenever the device is loaded. The interaction of the inducing and induced magnetic fields bends and shifts the resultant magnetic field. It is considered a common event for all electrical machines. For instance, the DC motors use "compensating coils" for minimizing it. And, maybe the same compensating coil concept can be used with the 1902 method. The latter is also the reason why the efficiency of the 1902 device should be tested by incrementing the load gradually from zero up to 100%.
I was able to verify that the currents flowing in the N and S electromagnets are not affected by the load connected to the "y" electromagnets. For example, a while ago I published the data of one of my experiments in which I had 1.3A DC flowing in the N and S electromagnets. The 1.3A did not change even when the "y' electromagnet was short circuited. The experiment was also validated by Woopy in one of the videos he posted in Youtube.
Bajac

Hi,
I guess that maybe Figuera had to redesign his original generator (1902) to skip the censorship after selling his patents to a banker union in 1902. He surely sell the patent and he was under a non-disclosure agreement. That´s why he and his generator disappeared from the public from 1902 to 1908.

Later he noted that the bankers were hiding his discovery and he had to re-design his genrator in order to bring it into the market. I think that he achieved a new design around 1907 or 1908, he maybe tried to delayed his last patent the more he could (note: in the 1908 patent is written that he waited for filing the patent until he got running his generator) . In 1908 he filed his patent and he died few days later. Maybe he was ill so he decided to file the patent before dying as a legacy, as a way to assure some incomes from his discovery and as a way to protect the business he had with Buforn, his associate in those years. I suppose that he was ill because he lived in the same city where it was the patent office and instead of filing the patent by himself and taking it to the office he sent to Constantino de Buforn as his representative. This could be an indication that he was quite ill at that moment, and he couldn´t leave his home to carry the patent to the office. But all of these ideas are just my suppositions.

Regards

forest

Please can you translate into english again this excerpt as exact and close as possible:


"[size=78%]Si dentro de un campo magnético se hace girar un circuito cerrado, colocado [/size]
perpendicularmente a las líneas de fuerza, en dicho circuito nacerán
corrientes inducidas que durarán tanto tiempo como dure el movimiento, y
cuyo signo dependerá del sentido en que semueva el circuito inducido. "


This is of UTMOST IMPORTANCE !

bajac

I also thought about the 3-phase line reactors such as this one:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/R-HOGENKAMP-3-UI-60-a-3-PHASE-LINE-REACTOR-BV-10833A-/380187334031?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5884ee558f


The core of the reactors can be cut to produce the "N", "S", and "y" electromagnets. Then, it would be relatively easy to reproduce the 1908 device.


What do you think?


Bajac