Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[DIHN]

and still, what you think according to this video?:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2WCAA6st_s

[NRamaswami]

I simply want to post some thing here..

We all know how to build a step down transformer.

Now instead of E and I core used to build the step down transformers let us use a single plastic tube. Let us say about 2 and half inches in diameter and 8 inches in length. We can put soft iron rods or any magnetisable material inside the plastic tube to produce the electromagnet. This is a solenoid of course.

What would we do to build a step down transformer on the solenoid.

Wind thick wires in the inside with fewer turns and thin wires on the outside with higher turns. Let us say we provide 220 turns on the primary outer side and then the inner side would need to have 50 turns on the inner thicker side secondary to produce 50 volts. 220 volts is stepped down to 50 volts. Amperage changes are based on wattage input but some current is lost in eddy currents and so we would have a lesser output than the input. If you do this in the way instructed above the result would be perfectly in line with theory. I have coducted this experiment and I know it to be correct.

Now instead of using thicker secondary and thinner primary what would happen if we use the same gauge wire and use a larger number of turns in the secondary. Voltage increases but amperage is reduced.

if we use a number of turns of thicker wire than in the primary what happens. Efficiency of the tranformer increases to almost 105% or 106%. Assuming that our meters are not correct we can see that efficiency has increased from the normal model.

What is the reason for the efficiency increase? That has overcome the eddy current losses in what would be a a theoretically a very inefficient system..

The reason is simple. By creating a large number of turns we have increased the magnetic field strength.

Magnetic field strength = Number of Turns per unit length x Amperes

This result comes after we wind about 12 layers of the secondary. The secondary is made up of thick insulated wire and the wires are closely wound.

( either induced or supplied or sum of both) ( Please note that I have not studied Electricity and Magnetism and am a Lawyer).

You can do this test yourself on this first device. Feel satisfied about what I say. You can put any magnetisable material. It is not necessary that soft iron should be used and any magnetisable material is fine. Transformer cores show low magnetism and so in this model may not be that efficient. But they are very expensive and I have not tried it.

Now to continue further what we have seen is a simple principle in action.

If the number of turns + Magnetic field strength + thickness of wire increases the amperage in the secondary increases along with the voltage. It can reach a point of COP=1 or very close to 1 or slightly above 1.

Let us now make another modification of the device and let us run the secondary inside the primary and along with the primary and outside the primary. We are not following the transformer rules here.

Secondary is made up of thicker wires. Primary turns are lower compared to secondary turns. So secondary is a step up transformer and must increase the voltage. However secondary is not made up of thin wires but made up of thick wires. The results are again showing to be closer to 1 when the same gauge wire is used but slightly above 1 when a thicker secondary wire is used.

Magnetic field strength= No of turns per unit length x Amperes

We have thus far increased the number of turns. We can increase the initial amperage by giving the current from a step down transformer with reasonable voltage About 50 volts is fine and about 16 Amps. You do the experiment and let me know the result.

However when we make one modification the output increases..

The thick secondary wire is wound first on the solenoid.

This is then followed by a thick bifilar coil.. This coil is wound as a proper bifilar coil except that both wire is shunted or shorted. End of wire 1 is connected to begining of wire 2 and end of wire 2 is connected again to beginning of wire 1.

Several layers of secondary are surrounded by several layers of bifilar coil and the primary is given from the outside. Always current flows from the outside wire of the primary towards the primary wire inside the inside.

The COP is now >1.  It is determined by the number of turns and the layers of the  thickness of shunted coil and the current flowing in the primary coil and the number of turns and layers and thickness of the secondary coil.

As the voltage increases the amperage in the secondary also increases. You can clearly see this in demonstrations.

This can be seen by building two of these solenoids as P1 and P2 as indicated for the single coil above but using about five inch thick plastic tubes for P1 and P2. And then putting another secondary wire between the North pole of P1 and south pole of P2 using several layers of thick wire in the 2 and half inch plastic tube so as to intercept the manetic flux between the irons of P1 and P2.

The primary of P1 is connected to the Primary of P2 and secondary of P1 is connected to the secondary wire in the middle and then the secondary of P2.

The COP now is above the COP>1 level. Higher the voltage in the secondary, higher the amperage in the secondary. This can be given to a load and can be tested.

If you use a multifilar coil to surround the central core, the resistance increases and so the frequency of the primary increases and this decreases the input amperage. In one modification of understanding what happens, we put several iron rods in between each layer of the multifilar coil to test what happens to the magnet. The magentic field strength reaches the saturation point. The magnet roars but electricity output from the wire to the load bulbs is nil. Some thing happens that so much of resistance is there to the flow of current that the entire electrical energy supplied is converted to magnetic form  and there is zero volt going to the load bulbs. Now even a 12 volt milli amps light would light up. We used 11 parallel wires to build the multifilar coil and had 18 to 19 layers of wire built in the way of a bifilar coil.

Either we are not given information on Electricity and magnetism or are taught the wrong principles or none is allowed to do research on this subject for some reason.

I'm not an Engineer. I'm not a scientist. Out of my contact with Patrick I did these experiments and found that building a cop>1 device is very easy.

Now in this device the primary and secondary are separated by the shunted or shorted coil. Therefore the primary and secondary are or must be in phase with each other. Therefore we must be able to provide a feedback from the secondary to the primary. Even if they are not in phase by using a variac with adequate capacity we can ensure that the primary is given  feedback energy. Once feedback energy is given the output can increase to COP=10000 times. This has been stated in the Amplidyne device.

However I must admit that I have not done any feedback of the current myself. Shortage of funds, lack of technical expertise and other problems are the reason.

I would explain the Hubbard coil now.

Hubbard coil is wound in the same fashion as the single solenoid. However Eight solenoids are arranged and connected to form a circle which makes them a larger solenoid. The secondary inside is connected in series and then given to the coil surrounding the central core. The Coils are arranged in this fashion..

Coil 1 - CW wound - 0'
Coil 2 - CW wound -90'
Coil 3- CCW wound -180'
Coil 4-CCW wound -270'
Coil 5- CW wound -45'
Coil 6-CW wound -135'
Coil 7-CCW wound -225
Coil 8-CCW Wound -315'

The bifilar coils surrounding the secondary are shunted at the end and beginning of coils 1 and 8.

The primary coil of the Hubbard is the outer coil that surrounds the shunted coil that covers the secondary. The primary can be given sufficient amperage and voltage to increase the magnetic field intensity to produce results and the resulting secondary output is far in excess of the input that a part of it is given back to the primary.. it is this part that is difficult to do for me. I have not done it so far.. But achieving COP>1 is very easy.

Any one can do it and the law of transformers specifically reduces the magnetic field strength in the name of increasing the efficiency by using lower magnetisable materials. Soft iron rods have far greater induction and eddy currents than transformer laminated cores. So without the increase in the magnetic field strength you cannot go COP>1

The other forms of devices that claim to achieve COP>1 use permanent magnets only for this reason. They increase the magnetic field intensity or magnetic flux by putting in a permanent magnet.

Once the principles are understood then many iterations or obvious modifications of the devices are possible.

Figuera appears to have used many primaries in series as a long multiple primary multiple secondary pole. The principle of varying the strength of current given to each primary reduces the secondary output. The secondary output is maximum when the opposing primaries are are of equal strength.

The transformer principle are inconsistent. They state that if you do like this voltage will be stepped up.

If you like this voltage will be stepped down. But what will happen if we put a larger number of turns thicker secondary wires is not answered in the transformer lessons. And what will happen if connect many step down transformers searially is also not stated. Voltage should go up and amperage remains constant. What would happen if these transformers are arranged to form a concentric ring in the center of which another multilayered thick wire is given and is connected to the serially connected step down transformer. Hubbard device is the result. COP>3 are normally claimed for this device but because you need to give only the initial input the cop is deemed to be infinity.

The bifilar shunted coils I guess act like capactors. Once the current is given the coils charge up. And once it stops the coils discharge inducing further current and the process continues.

When the feedback from the secondary is cut off this process is stopped.

The same principle has been stated by Daniel MaFarland Cook, Figuera and Hubbard.

I have not studied the other devices. Daniel Mcfarland cook patent drawings appear to be altered. But he states the same principle as figureas principle. It is possible that the patent text is also altered. But the Figuera patent and especially the BuForn patents are clear that they avoid the use of Lenz law.

Lens Law is avoided only when electricity flows between opposite poles of two magnets.

I still do not understand why when we use P1-S1-P2 in series the primary input drops and why it increases when P1 alone is used. This is some thing that I'm not able to understand.

If the Hubbard coil device I have mentioned above or the Figuera long pole shaped device is placed between two electrical poles and the high voltage electricity that is transmitted is sent via the outer primary coils an enormous amount of energy can be generated easily.

Now what is electricity and how is it produced? I think given my lack of theoretical knowledge and my experimental observations electricity appears to be generated by magnetism or osciallations of magnetic field. It can be done by rotating the magnet or it can be done by generating a rotating magnetic field. Enormous amount of current called Telluric current is supposed to flow between the North Pole and South Pole of the Earth under the Earth. At every point on the earth. Does it has some thing to do with this? We do not know.

We do not need to convert mechanical energy to Electrical energy. That thought process or teaching appears to be wrong. We only need high magnetic field strength and the magnet need not rotate and can remain stationary and still produce electricity. This is what is done in transformers but the transformer theory does not teach what would happen if the experiments are carried out in the manner done by me and explained above.

The experimental results go against the theory. No professor who has been informed about it would even send any email about it. Why? I really do not know. No one even wants to mention that they are curious or would like to check the facts. Again I do not know why.

It appears to be a cursed field. People who try to do this kind of experiments have suffered and so I'm simply giving up.

Buforn Patent Last Patent Last Page is the one that shows the best mode of the Figuera device. Rest of the types of not efficient through they can work.

These are my experimental observations and any one can easily replicate it. The secondary and primary and the shunted coils are all wound in the same direction. If the winding is shown as CW all are CW. If the winding is shown as CCW all are shown as CCW.

It look correct to say that if you put one liter of water in you can only take one liter of water out. But What exactly is electricity? Where does it come from? why rotating a magnet and putting a rotating magnetic field and putting a conductor in the rotating magnetic field should produce electricity?.Why it cannot produce otherwise?

And where is Electricity coming from are questions that are not answered. The only understanding we have at the moment is that electricity is connected some how to magnetism and higher the magnetic field intensity, greater the amount of current produced and vice versa. Since Magnetic field strength is based on the number of turns and the number of turns of shunted coils can be increased to any number we do not need to provide a large amount of input energy to create a large amount of magnetic field sterngth. It can be altered at our will.

Since the the idea that putting one liter of water in a water bottle can give us only one liter of water back does not apply to making a powerful magnetic field strength, COP>1 devices are very easy to produce. If we master feedback it looks like any device can be made to output easily hundreds of times of input energy. But I do not have the technical or financial resources to do it.

Since I have given the info to one member of the forum it is fair that I give it to all. Thank you.

[tak22]

NRamaswami

Thank you very much for posting details of your experimental results and observations. You've included some concepts that I'll be interested in trying for myself.

all the best,
tak

[RandyFL]

21 March 15   13:30:00
Hello all,
Results...
My commercially made electromagnet performed as expected...pullin a piece of metal back and forth ( pulsating from the semiconductors) and producing small voltages in my analog multimeter. When my lower ohmed resistors arrive Monday I should be able to get better results.

All the Best
RandyFL

[NRamaswami]

Tak:

You are most welcome and many thanks for the kind words. If any thing is not clear just pm me and I will explain.

We used about 360 meters of primary wire and 720 metres of secondary wire.  For each Pole primary coil of Figuera I would think you would need about 3 coils of 6 sq mm wire and for the central core you would need about 2 coils of 6 sq mm wire in total about 8 coils of 90 metres length.

Shunted coil was 6 layers on each primary.

For the Primary you would need two coils of 4 sq mm wire each. We used quadfilar primary. Output was very significant in ourexperiments and so I would suggest that you use lower voltage and higher amperage stepped down input. Higher the voltage in the secondary higher is the amperage obtained as seen on the load lamps.

In total the number of layers on the Primaries would need to be about minimum of 20+ layers for you to see good results.

Daniel McFarland Cook states this that a minimum of 1000 feet or more of wire is needed. That the coil ultimately had a diameter of 24 inches.  I think he meant that he has placed a capcitor of copper plates continuously rolled with two insulating sheets in between the outer primary and inner secondary. The Poles were placed NS-NS from his description and it cannot be like that as they opposite poles would move towards each other and must have been separated by a iron pole that transferred the magnetic flux from one primary to the other. This is the secondary shown in Figueras patent.

Figuera did not disclose the shunted coil or the capacitors but used the word properly wound to describe the reels of coils.

Additionally the size of the magnet matters. Bigger the size and length of the iron, more powerful is the magnet and more amperage is needed to make it a powerful magnet. This is common sense. But Daniel McFarland Cook states that the size of the Primary iron is 2,3 or 6 or more feet of iron for each primary. Diameter of resulting Primary coil is 24 inches. He is talking about a circuit D which is not shown in the drawings and I guess that it may be a kind of safe positive feedback mechanism when he suggests the use of a rheostat. I think it is like the variac controller to regulate the voltage or current but I'm not sure. If positive feedback can be done along with what I have done the problem is solved. Naturally bigger the size of the iron core greater would be the input needed to achieve high magnetic field intensity. Output would also be higher only with biggre cores.

If I have not described things properly please ask me any time. I will do my best to clarify.