Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[NRamaswami]

Doug:

Thanks. Honestly speaking, I really do not know. Retaining the magnetic flux and preventing it from leaving the system creates heat and that is quite undesireable as the wires and the iron become very hot. we always leave little gap in between the P1, S1 and P2 cores so that the iron is exposed to the air to venitlate the heat. Only then the iron is not heated much. In any case the gap occurs as the winding is done manually and there is a one turn less as we move up in the layers. So I'm not sure if what you say is correct. This time of the year is the vacation season in India. I have a good idea of what to do but it will cost me significant money to experiment, find out how to reduce the output to 220 volts and then increase the amperage. I believe that we would be able to maintain the output voltage at 220 volts and increase the amperage but I need to wait and see. Many calculations have gone wrong and different results come in experiments.  I will post here after about 15 to 20 days if we have done any experiments. At the moment we are not doing any and I have nothing to post.

[Doug1]

NRamaswamiI clipped this image from your pdf. It is drawn as a continuous core with a narrow section in the middle. Like an hourglass. Are you saying the core has complete breaks between the three sets of coils or is this an image of a single core and coil to which three of them will be placed in alignment?

[NRamaswami]

Doug:

I apologize for the delay. One Picture is worth 1000 words. One video is worth 100,000 words.  I will put up both pictures and videos next week.
Your picture is correct. My understanding of the whole thing is as follows. I may well be wrong.

When permanent magnets are made, they require a one time input and keep magnetism intact. But their field is stable. So to get a rotating magnetic field we need to rotate the permanent magnet. This requirs mechanical energy. Such rotation leads to Lenz law effects and so the output is less than input. With Electromagnets we get automatically rotating magnetic fields. As I have seen it is not necessary to give a huge input to create a large and powerful electromagnet. About 110 watts is sufficient. But if the design of the device is made properly the secondary will have a lot of turns. This causes the voltage in the secondary to increase. If we avoid Lenz law effects and increase the number of turns of secondary and use wires that are at least as thick as the primary, then we have a situation where more current is produced due to higher voltages. Voltge should be necessarily higher in the secondary than in the primary for this to happen.

I'm going to check whether it would be possible to give lower voltage and higher amperage input and then get the same result by giving low voltage and high amperage input. Then it would enable me to count the turns and reduce the output to 300 volts and then that can be given to loads. We will check whether it is doable.  We will also see what further improvement can be made and then we will provide the devices to the lab.

Unfortunately it is not possible for me to fund for all devices and so we need to make one device and give it to the lab and take mesurements and then reuse the wires and then take the next measurement. I will put up a video and photographs and gauge of wire used and number of turns and length of the wire so it can be replicated.

If I succeed in the present attempt then it would enable me to use a simple UPS system and connect it to a step down transformer and then feed the device and take the output and keep the UPS system powered by the output voltage. Let me see it if can be done. And what is the usable output. Since there is no conversion from AC to DC except inside the UPS system to power the battery I think the losses can be minimised and let me see what happens. I will post information when it is available which may take two or three more weeks.

[JohnMiller]

@NRamaswami
Many, many thanks for your detailed contribution! I got knowledge via the P. Kelley publication of your device and am very interested to try a replication. This is my first post in this forum but I am no newbie in matters of free energy. I am sure to have plenty of questions but first I want to reread all your contributions (English is not my native language).

As I am a trained electrical engineer I agree with all warnings regarding dealing with lethal voltages. Folks, take it seriously! We need all of you in order to have success!
On the other hand I need to "de-learn" lots of stuff in order to get free view on what you report. In this respect you might be far in advance compared with trained individuals. Hence sharing knowledge and open minds is the receipt for overall success.

Two question in advance:
- Did you use standard PVC isolated wires like used by electricians? In some areas it is very difficult to get massive wire in 4 square mm. Do you feel that speaker twin cable (litz wire) will do the job?
- What kind of iron rods did you use? Was it oxidized annealed soft iron? What diameter? Did you use welding rods. Bedini likes them. But the copper plating fosters eddy currents on their surface.

I feel as first setup we should try to do a replica as close to yours as possible in order to get not too many unknown parameters involved at same time. Enhancements can be done only AFTER we have a functioning prototype - not before like many individuals try.

@ALL
Just some common hints:
1.
Aluminum wire has a resistance 1.5 times of copper. Hence the cross section needs to be increased times 1.5 in order to have same resistance. On the other hand aluminum tends to break far earlier if being rewound repeatedly. Regarding these facts the cost calculation needs to be revised.

2.
Incandescent bulbs are good means of electrical load but it is very difficult to check their intensity. Fortunately it is an easy and cheap means available to measure it.
Any solar cell (e.g. from calculators) can be connected to digital multimeters directly while setting them in µA range. Solar cells behave quite linearly in respect to light intensity vs. short circuited current.
Knowing this fact we can compare light intensity:
1. Calibration: Connect the bulb to mains and place the cell on top of the bulb. Measure mains voltage / amperage and µA from solar cell. Commercial bulbs have great variation. Therefore it is important to use one individual bulb and a individual cell and calibrate this setup.
2. Setup: Avoid any light from environment. You may prepare an empty tin can with a hole for the cell can and cover the bulb.
3. Document: Take notes of the values measured.
4. Measure: Whenever you use this bulb as load you can measure µA and have an understanding of the ratio between calibration and load condition. So you can know for sure if  your calibrated bulb lights in normal intensity.
5. Bonus: I you own an variac you can generate a chart along different voltages. Calculating the power (V*A) you can know the power dissipated from µA reading only.
6. Hint: Do not let the cell get hot because of accuracy issues at heat. Perform momentary measurements only. Same principle can be applied e.g. at 12V or 24V bulbs as well.
 

[marathonman]

I have not posted in a while and i see this POST or thread was high jacked by NRamaswami. this post is about FIGUERAS not NRamaswami..... you should of started a NEW THREAD. i see even Patrick's PDF linked your project to this thread( SHAME ON YOU)
NO WONDER all the heavy weights left this thread and stopped posting because of  (PEOPLE LIKE YOU!)     KISS MY BACK SIDE NRamaswami !