Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

ATOM1



MadMack

I have been going over the info in the Kelly guide about the replication by N. Ramaswami. There are a lot of theories about how the extra amperage is created, but I did not see any mention of this. That is the difference in the core diameter of the inducing coils vs the core of the induced.

If the outer cores are 100 mm diameter and the center core is 65mm the area of the outers is 7854 and the area of the inner is 3318.315. A ratio of 2.3668 to 1. If the magnetic flux density in the outers is 1, then the flux density through the center secondary core 2.36.

As long as the center core is not saturated, wouldn't this increase in flux density produce a correspondingly greater increase of amperage in the center secondaries?

Mack

Doug1

Mac
  I mentioned the hour glass shape of the cores a while ago. Think in terms of fluid dynamics.The choke point would have to produce a greater passage speed or a compression of the field inside the winding. I was always under the impression a magnetic field is not compressible. Excluding distortions, a core can only hold so much and that's it. It start to turn to heat in the same way an induction heater works. The only exception I was able to find is when coils are wound with a subtractive cancellation winding like used in some mag amps. Feed back can ether add to or subtract from. Sometimes its called biasing but it all boils down to a conserving application of the output against the input. Even in a dynamic microphone using electrets as the static field. If there is no polarization in the form of a field you have to use some energy from some where to produce one in order to have a reaction.Even a iron core has a  state of being regardless of it being polarized or not. The wire not so much without a charge moving. I have never found a permanent copper "magnet" wire in the past.
The focus continues to be on everything except how to make it self run. It's the only thing which makes it different from any other common device. How did Church Hill put it? The right thing in the end after every other possible wrong thing is exhausted. So be it.

MadMack

Hi Doug,

Thanks for commenting. I follow what you said.

If I model the cores Mr. Ramaswami used, the flux lines do increase in density through the smaller center core. Greater number of lines per cm^2, same total flux. If I understand what I've read it is the number of lines per cm^2, or gauss, that indicate the magnetic field strength. So it seems to me that the two end transformers are sharing flux through the center core and the magnetic field strength or gauss through there is more than doubled, so the center coil should be capable of producing higher current.

I'm curious. This makes logical sense to me so what am I missing?

Mack