Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[a.king21]

Hi a.king21,
Could you explain better how can energy be extracted from an oscillating bloch wall? Is there any link or reference to this subject?

What it is true is that Figuera stated that the distance between the two inducer external coils should be very small. And this statement is related with some kind of effect that he was trying to capture. Is it needed to wind each external coil in clockwise (CW) and counter-clockwise (CCW) directions?

http://servv89pn0aj.sn.sourcedns.com/~gbpprorg/mil/mindcontrol/Richard_Clark_Letters_Compilation_Vol1-3.pdf


About half way in the pdf Richard Lefors Clark explains the gating of the Bloch wall.


I would treat N ans S as one continuous coil - so the windings are in the same direction. The Bloch wall arises naturally.
What Figuera appears to have done is to oscillate the Bloch wall with this simple design.
That's why he clearly pictures the y coil as much smaller than the two control coils.
If the y coil is much  bigger than the Bloch wall then Lenz kicks in and ou is gone.
You can get one coil from each dead CFL . The core is however ferite and may need to be changed.
I've had this on my "to do" list for a long time.

[hanon]

What Figuera appears to have done is to oscillate the Bloch wall with this simple design.
That's why he clearly pictures the y coil as much smaller than the two control coils.

It is true that Figuera stated in his 1902 patent that the separation between the poles of the electromagnets must be very small. In 1908 Figuera wrote: "Between their poles is located the induced circuit represented by the line "y" (small)" I have always been intriged why he called line "y" and not coil "y".

Anyway, I have been collecting some material about magnetism discoveries by Howard Johnson and, Roy Davis & Rawls. Maybe you are interested in the next video. It is -at least- surprising:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWOKefrcpAg

I know that there is more into magnetism that the current concepts accepted by mainstream science.

Regards

[hanon]

Hi all,

Apart from the 1908 Figuera patent there is another Figuera patent (No. 30378 dated in 1902) about a motionless electrical generator: http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/docums/30378.pdf This device is even simpler to replicate. Figuera appeared in the newspapers in 1902 when he was using this generator to produce 20 HP. Therefore we know that he also got high energy gains. Later, Figuera changed his design after selling this patent to a banker union.

A deep study about this patent was also done by user Bajac. You can find his technical study in the next link, which is really worthwhile to read it:

http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/dlattach/attach/125092/

As a conclusion: "BECAUSE THE INTERIOR WINDINGS (b) ARE TOTALLY ENCLOSED BY THE INDUCED WIDING (c) THE INDUCED MAGNETIC FIELD WILL ENTER AND LEAVE THE TURNS OF THE INTERIOR WINDING (b) INDUCING A ZERO NET VOLTAGE, WHICH RESULTS IN A CANCELLATION OF THE EFFECTS OF THE LENZ'S LAW. IN OTHER WORDS, THE LOAD CURRENT FLOWING IN THE c-WINDING IS NOT REFLECTED BACK TO THE b-WINDING."

Note: The induced winding is denoted by (c) while the inducer electromagnets are (a) and (b)

[hanon]

Regarding the methods to minimize the effect of Lenz's law, one can see that Figuera used two method: the method of in the 1902 patent and the method in the 1908 patent. If you draw the magnetic flowpath in the 1902 generator, it can be noted that the flow of the induced coil (external) enters and leaves the inducer coil (internal). Because the inducer coil is symmetrically placed at 90 degrees inside the induced, the flow from the induced coil will enter and leave the inducer coil. If the flow enters and leaves the coil no voltage will be induced in it. Notice that it is not enough to placed those coils at 90 degrees but also there must be symmetry. This is because if there is no symmetry the balance of magnetic flux entering is not necessarily equal to the magnetic flux coming out.

The method of 1908 is different. While one coil induces another coil deviates the induced magnetic flux so that this flux does not oppose to the coil which is inducing.

[Doug1]

How deep is the rabbit hole Alice? Oh ,it's about yay deep ends about at the spot where you cant go any farther.lol
  In the interest of statements used one could consider what is the patent for and what is it not for. Things that already are in play are not new. Seperate them out and learn what is not new. To better understand what is.
close'st comparable. There seems to be many, patent 3913004 "Method and apparatus to increase electral power" Built on a standard generator frame fairly straight forward good nuggets. But is that one BS umm have to check the citations 3078409 "Electrical power converter" GM owned aviation use.2640181 "Dynomo electric machine " signed to Bendix aviation.Who know they had a aviation division ,Ithought they just worked with braking systems.3223916 "Brushless Rotary inverter" signed to TRW inc a big gov contractor with lots of little gubby fingers in lots of pies.Like a daycare center on crack. Now while I like to ponder how all these big wigs never stumbled on the idea to just make thier toys not turn I have to remind myself with whom they like to sleep with.Who stands to lose the most money.Not just the money today but all the money for all time. Figura figured out why have it turn at all.Others figured how to stay in business and still get the benifits of better engineering. You can learn a lot if you keep plugging along.The method is what is important not the exact toys. The same applied to weapon like a gun would yeid a zero recoil gun where all the forces both forard and recoil are directed to forward only motion or force forward.