Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

antijon

Hanon, I appreciate your advice but I don't think it's safe to rely on previous patents for clues. And his first patents were... I have no idea because he lacks so much info. On the contrary, I see a lot of similarities to the Buforn patents, from design to what they describe as the operation.

lol I see that it does resemble a three phase transformer... However it also resembles a generator. I'll share my test results whether it does something or flops.

marathonman

Quote from: iflewmyown on September 29, 2015, 05:19:44 PM
marathonman, You should keep a civil tongue in your head. Nramaswami has given a huge contribution to this work and shared it freely. So far you have shown drawings. For what it is worth several of your drawings do not work at all. I wasted some time trying them even though there was no reason to believe they would work. I have been at this for over thirty years and have read hundreds of reports from people who have solved the free energy problem, in the end they were mistaken. So when you show an actual machine working I'll buy the champagne. Until then I won't hold my breath.
Garry
First off i disagree about the contribution of a certain person of whom you speak so highly of.....working an a device that have nothing to do with Figueras device and high jacking this thread for his own personal agenda thus diverting people from our real goal.
secondly i was posting drawing of other people idea's "NOT MINE" to get an idea of what they were talking about to get a better visualization. i sense quit posting other people ideas as it only distracted me from my own idea's of Figueras devise. that's why i took a brake from this forum to rid my mind of all the other non working ideas and concentrate on the real working aspects of how to take a rotating Dynamo and make it stationary. as i have posted earlier i visualized for six long months over Figueras devise and as far as i am concerned i have the closest working model to date. "simple and elegant"
and hell yes i am in the process of building it and will freely post my findings.


FIGUERAS SIMPLY ROCKS !

marathonman

Hello everyone,

I have been using a slightly different type of pulsing system then what was used by PJK with better luck. i have been using a Hex Schmitt trigger or the 741 Op amp instead of the 555 timer. the 74HC14 has a very sharp wave form compared to the 555. below are a few circuits that i have used, the first one being the best in my opinion.

marathonman

Here are two other types of ring Dynamo's of Figueras time.
please look at the way each coil is wound....... CW, CCW, CW, CCW..ect.... imagine that !
also look as the magnets rotate and advance one coil, the flux is reversed trough each "coil pair" each time......imagine that !

hanon

Is it the same a field which changes in time (as in transformers) that field due to movement of the magnetic field (as in generators)?


According to the research William J. Hooper no. He found differences between both kind of induction.


Quote
It is established that there are three types of electric fields. The first due to a distribution of charge known as an electrostatic field. The other two are associated with the two types of electromagnetic induction. The first type of induction is known as flux cutting and is due to relative spatial motion with respect to magnetic flux. The electric field resulting from this type of induction is the motional electric field. This type of electric field has unique properties that separate it from the other two. Experimentally, it is confirmed that this electric field is immune to shielding due to the fact that magnetic (not electric) boundary conditions apply to it. Motional electric fields can also exist where the total magnetic field that induces it consists of non-zero components that sum to zero. The other type of induction is due to linking time changing magnetic flux.


[size=78%]
[/size]