Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

darediamond

Quote from: cliff33 on April 13, 2016, 12:51:28 PM
Unless connected in series, the Secondary output voltage will always be lower while amperage will be Higher if Thick AWG Wire like AWG#14 or 15 or 16 is used to wind them. So few HOUSEHOLD Resistive devices runs at low Voltage.


Secondary voltage is dependent on turns ratio and voltage ratio follows suit.

e.g: If primary has 100 turns and secondary has 500. that's a ratio of 5 to 1.
If primary is being pulsed at 10 volts then secondary voltage will be 5x10 = 50 volts.

Why would you want to prematurely change the  pulsed output to pure dc before testing for over-unity?
I could find many ways of loading that 50 volt output, just for testing.

We should all remember that Tesla's later years were exclusively devoted to experiments
in pulsed dc. Maybe it's just the pulsed dc that attracts the free energy. Nobody knows for sure.
We have to walk before we can run. Just one step at a time.

"Secondary voltage is dependent on turns ratio and voltage ratio follows suit."

No that is not the case when Lenz is cancelled out and Secondary Wire Gauge is Higher than the Primary wire gauge.

AC is better because Back E.M.F is not generated with it.

seaad

Quote from: nul-points on April 14, 2016, 03:05:32 AM
Nice investigation, seaad!  Would it be too much work to replace the 'rotary' coils with Figuera's 'resistors' in your LTSpice sim above and compare efficiency?

I have tried with just resistors also in LT Spice sim. (Similar (DC-bias) test see my reply #3171 on: February 24, 2016)

Output power becomes lower with resistors as well as the BMF spikes (400-4kV) at the transistor colletors.

Inside the coils are already reasonable simulated winding-resistors.

We have to reinterpret the Figuera patent text as the devil reads the Bible. Or is there anyone here who can explain how the Figuera 0U occurs ??  ::)
  DC is 'Bad' but AC is 'Good' !
       Keep soaring...

nul-points


very thorough - that's Good!

...and the eagle flies... with the dove...

"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

hanon

Seead,


I see that you have simulated the DC reheostat proposed by marathonman.


But I see that you just got one signal and that signal has positive and negative parts. In Figuera generator we need two signals and just with positive part. Is it possible to achieve with the rheostat?


One more question: Is your simulation software simulating a toroidal core? I guess that a toroidal core will not behave identically to a bar core.


As for you last statement, I write here my interpretation of the Figuera Generator:


The magic of the Figuera generator is that makes possible to convert two variable magnetic fields in time in the electromagnets (dB/dt) into a variable magnetic field in space (in the induced coils), as happens in all generators ( emf = B·v· Length )  moving back and forth the magnetic lines.


That´s all. A motionless generator capable of creating flux-cutting induction. Visit my site for a deeper explanation of this same concept. See the videos linked there.

hanon

Another very simple method to drive the inducers. No waste heat in resistors.


FEEDING THE ELECTROMAGNET WITH TWO OPPOSSITE SQUARE SIGNALS FROM A VOLTAGE SOURCE


If you feed two square signals (in opposition) created with two transistors (in opposition: when one is ON the other is OFF and later the contrary) those signals once that reach each set of coils suffer a filter (as consequence of the inductance of the coils.RL Filter with time constant, tau = L/R) which converts them into two opposite sawtooth signals, as needed in the patent.

The electronic driving circuit for those signals could be quite simple: a 555 chip (or other) to create a low power pulsed signal. This signal could go directly to a power transistor to drive one set of coils. This same low power pulsed signal from the 555 chip also should go to a NOT gate to invert it. This inverted signal should go to a second transistor to create the second square signal in opposition to the first one. It can also achieved with a relay with two outputs: first on+off, later when switched  off+on. Another posibility is with two positives AC half waves fed alternatively. The RL filter will be superimposed over the shape of the input signal.

The simulation result attached below is for two a 12 V square signals at 35 Hz fed into two coils per set (each coil with 2.3 Ohms and 23 mH). Original square signals may reach zero voltage because the coils filter their dynamics and avoid reaching the zero level. Before reaching zero voltage the next pulse appears. Initial signal : square signal from 12 V to  0 V. As the inductance of the system determines the shape of the sawtooth it is recommended to have the possibility to vary the frequency of the square signal in order to adjust it to the best output. In the Excel attached you may find a simulation with different values of the inductance and the frequency.