Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[allcanadian]

@marathonman

It never ceases to amaze me how you people can blindly post stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with Figuera's device at all.

Read and digest William Hopper Motional electric field paper. you will find that the Figuera device is a pure BV device hands down. he proved that not only is Figuera's device is NN orientation but that it is a pure BV device with B fields cancelling but are positive and additive. just because the B fields are cancelled does not mean the Electric fields are. they are in fact not cancelled and are positive and additive with the Secondary residing in the space where B = 0 but E fields are alive and present.
this man proved with out ANY doubt 70 years later that the Figueraa device is pure BV in nature. if you doubt him you need to see his credentials before you run the mouth to disagree.

Hanon i know not where you are coming from because the Figuera device is a completely different operation. Magnacoaster uses a ringing effect and Figuera's device is pure BV in design and basically may be the only one of it's kind. it is a overlooked simple fact the hidden BV field.

The problem I see is that last week the secret wasn't the hidden BV field it was something else and everyone was stupid because they didn't understand it. The week before that it was something entirely different and again everyone was stupid because they didn't understand that either. No offense but it's hard to believe you have credibility when the supposed secret of how it works keeps changing on a weekly basis. So which secret is it, this one?, last weeks secret nobody understands or the one before that nobody understands?.

As well it is William J Hooper not William Hopper and I read the document in question many years ago most recently a couple months ago. William J Hooper's work was a variation on the work of Wilhelm Weber known as Weber Electrodynamics. Keep in mind this magical science you have just discovered was being debated in the late 18th century by some pretty big names you may recognize such as Ampere, Gauss as well as Weber. All had units of measure named after them which is a very big deal in the field of science. So this is by no means new in fact it is very old and fairly well documented it's just that few have been able to put all the pieces together.

This is just a thought but I think there might be more open and constructive debate about this if you lost the fucking attitude and started talking like a normal person. I mean it get's old really fast and is kind of counter productive in my opinion.

AC

[hanon]

Figuera: a coil between two magnetic fields in movement

http://i.makeagif.com/media/10-13-2014/K7jseC.gif

[marathonman]

well excuse my stupid unintentional miss spelling. William Hooper is the closest i have came to describing the figuera device. if it was just a coil between two magnetic fields then why hasn't anyone on here built it, if it's that easy. get real ! probably because no one has the balls to admit they have NO clue about the Figuera device. study the field interaction for months then come back to the table with something useful.

[allcanadian]

@marathonman

well excuse my stupid unintentional miss spelling. William Hooper is the closest i have came to describing the figuera device. if it was just a coil between two magnetic fields then why hasn't anyone on here built it, if it's that easy. get real ! probably because no one has the balls to admit they have NO clue about the Figuera device. study the field interaction for months then come back to the table with something useful.

Don't get me wrong I have read your posts and you do keep changing your mind. This is a very good sign because it means your learning new things while many others continue to spin their wheels. I won't even tell you how many times I have changed my mind concerning these patents and many many others. You have come a long way however you still have a long way to go.


Here is the problem I see, when we come out and say this is the way it is then change our minds we have backed ourselves into a corner and limited our options. Were much better off to say , I think this is more relevant, I think this is a better answer, what do you guys think?. Being honest with others and ourselves means we never have to remember what we said.


For example, in Hooper's motional field a variation of Weber's electrodynamics there would seem to be a field convergence where two fields cancel and two fields add. The question is under what circumstances and how does it relate to the Figuera patent?. You know a long time ago I read a story about a Scottish engineer who was building canals. In one instance a wave like disturbance was formed in the canal which moved as an independent body. It traveled at high speed down the canal for miles and appeared unaffected by the canal losing almost no energy. He called it a "wave of translation" later known as a solitary or Soliton Wave.


I have this curse whereby I can't remember my anniversary, what I ate yesterday or what I did at work however I can recall every science and technology article I have ever read in my life. The Soliton wave sticks out because it's a rule breaker in that it is a self-reinforcing completely independent phenomena once certain precise physical conditions are met. In consideration of these facts maybe we need to be a little more critical of our circuit layout and "geometry". Maybe we need to pay more attention to "how" a current is switched and under what "specific conditions" it is switched versus simplistic terms such as frequency and duration. It is fascinating stuff... what do you think?.


AC

[marathonman]

 quote; "Maybe we need to pay more attention to "how" a current is switched and under what "specific conditions"  it is switched"
  i have been trying to convey that very thought (poorly i might add) for the last 6 months. this device can not be switched in any haphazard fashion by some yahoo timing.
i completely agree.


  You need corrected, I haven't changed my mind about the Figuera device in about 6 or 7 months because i know the exact function and working's of each device but i just recently properly IDed the device and contrary to ANY one on this forum, i know the Figuera device is a pure BV Motional Field Generator. their is NO other explanation to describe the device's function because if the pressure between the electromagnets is not maintained the induction will fall to the output of just one electromagnet, in which you know it or not is one quarter of a quadrature generator.
both electromagnets amount to 1/2 of the quadrature if running properly.....i.e. pressure maintained between them. in order for the pressure to be maintained between them a complete and orderly variation of currant has to be maintained and never reaching Zero or reversed like with AC.  if AC is attempted you will NEVER attain the pure BV function.  also the function of part G is not only to split the currant (with two opposing fields) it functions as a magnetic resistor in the process storing power in it's core in the form of a magnetic field to be used every half turn of the brush, thus being fed every half turn by the declining electromagnet being basically shoved out of the secondary by the increasing electromagnet.

see while every one was posting erroneous information  (the same stuff for 6 month) i took myself to Figuera school and have been posting the real deal since.  so much so that i was approached buy a friend's business partner that wants to fund me building the Figuera device, my presentation is next week. see i realized i can put the device on a toroid and then stacked in a nice and neat package to power the house, car and God knows every thing else for that matter.

so you see i can care less about all the negativity and bad mouthing because  i know the figuera device and have planes for it. i just thought that i would clue people in but i see that will never happen.

Good luck in your adventure Mr. allcanadian