Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

I do apologize for the mistake i made in the previous post, graph in incorrect. the peak of the AC wave from the secondary through the commutator to the opposite brush is in fact at the inputs from set N and set S. this will cause an amplification when combined with the reducing primaries and the reducing side of part G to the rising primaries.
again i do apologize for the brain fart on my part as i was not feeling well at the time. since i can not delete the post or correct it i will post a corrected graph in my next post. since i am moderated it will take days or even a week to correct my mistake.

Here is the corrected post.

In this graph Below you can see with the North >< North fields at the positive brush are what keeps the inductor sides separate from the currant flow from set N and set S. as the brush rotates adding or subtracting winding's and core on that side of the brush that causes the magnetic fields opposing the original currant flow to rise and fall in an orderly linear fashion from the self inductance being raised and lowered.

on the opposite side of the core from the N><N brush is the perfect place to introduce the secondary output.   if the secondary in being introduced here which will be negative in sign it will be opposing South><South fields at the brush since part G is wound CCW . what this will do is add to the cores magnetic fields if they are are in need of more potential from the losses occurred in it's function. this will allow part G to become the sole power supply once the starting supply is removed.

since a commutator is rotating with the brushes it can be used to always keep the secondary negative polarity in the opposite half of the core as to not interfere with the positive brush. so this means that the negative side and the positive side will always be opposite from one another.

i know this might sound a little confusing but if you study the graph, the rotation of the fields and the interaction of the currant you will begin to realize what i am trying to convey to everyone. the twin inductors will allow the currant to be absorbed into the magnetic field and not be a dead short as you might be thinking. as the negative secondary brush rotates towards the input from the primaries the potential will be at it's peak allowing that potential combined with the reducing primaries and the reducing half of part G combined giving an amplification of potential to the rising primaries. the magnetic fields are of course inside the core as this is just for visualization purposes.


Marathonman

[marathonman]

Please excuse the poor graphics but i am sure the point will still be conveyed.

if you look at the graph you will see that as the secondary output is at it's peak it will be at the input of the low side of part G and primary either set N or set S.  since the reduction of the primaries magnetic field is being released as is the low side of part G's inductor,  the potential from the secondary and the other two will give the amplification to the rising side of part G and the primaries boosting the output to the secondaries. by looping the secondary back to part G through a commutator it will allow the device to be self sustaining as we are basically replacing the losses from the system in the inducing side which is a closed  system. the commutator keeps the negative side of the secondary AC wave turned to DC in the opposite side of the positive brush at all times. the same is true for the positive side of the AC wave as it keeps both positive side together.

and this my friends is how Figuera loped his secondaries back to the system to attain self sustainment.

[marathonman]

Inductive Reactance
The reduction of current flow in a circuit due to induction is called inductive reactance. By taking a closer look at a coil of wire and applying Lenz's law, it can be seen how inductance reduces the flow of current in the circuit. In the image below, the direction of the primary current is shown in red, and the magnetic field generated by the current is shown in blue. The direction of the magnetic field can be determined by taking your right hand and pointing your thumb in the direction of the current. Your fingers will then point in the direction of the magnetic field. It can be seen that the magnetic field from one loop of the wire will cut across the other loops in the coil and this will induce current flow (shown in green) in the circuit. According to Lenz's law, the induced current must flow in the opposite direction of the primary current. The induced current working against the primary current results in a reduction of current flow in the circuit.

It should be noted that the inductive reactance will increase if the number of winds in the coil is increased since the magnetic field from one coil will have more coils to interact with.
Similarly to resistance, inductive reactance reduces the flow of current in a circuit. However, it is possible to distinguish between resistance and inductive reactance in a circuit by looking at the timing between the sine waves of the voltage and current of the alternating current. In an AC circuit that contains only resistive components, the voltage and the current will be in-phase, meaning that the peaks and valleys of their sine waves will occur at the same time. When there is inductive reactance present in the circuit, the phase of the current will be shifted so that its peaks and valleys do not occur at the same time as those of the voltage. in a DC circuit this is not so.

Self inductance or Inductance
The above scenario is when using AC with DC we have a whole new ball game. in a DC operated device it is called self inductance or inductance. since DC is a semi steady state how are we to get the same reactions of currant reduction simular to that of AC which is alternating currant.
we have to make some kind of changes to the circuit to cause the magnetic field to change in intensity that causes the field to interact with the windings next to it to produce the reverse EMF to oppose the original currant flow. something has to move to induce a change. there are three ways to achieve this 1. change the currant like AC does. 2. change the magnetic field. 3. change the circuit parameters...ie the length, core and winding count which in turn changes the magnetic field that changes the currant flow.

Any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current.

this is what the positive brush does. as it rotates it is magnetically linking or unlinking to the circuit and it is this that causes the magnetic field to change that produces the reverse EMF to the original currant flow. in the AC device the currant up or down causes the reaction,  in the DC circuit the circuit increasing or decreasing  in size is what causes the currant change.

The AC device is static but the alternating currant causes the change.

In the DC device in order to get the changes the device has to be changed from a static device to a dynamic device thus the use of a positive rotating brush allows this device to have currant changes dynamically on the fly.

If the device operation was static the magnetic field would even out over a short time and allow a steady currant to flow so in order to get a constant currant rise and fall the circuit has to be constantly changed in length adding or subtracting winding's and core material dynamically as the brush rotates.

and this my friends is how Figuera's part G operates.



Marathonman

[marathonman]

If you haven't already noticed Figuera was a sheer Genius of the fact that using the reducing magnetic fields to his advantage aiding the device in a very positive way.

take the primaries for instance, powering up the primaries to full potential will have a  very nice magnetic field projecting out of it's core. since we all know now that once that magnetic field is established the power to maintain said field will be reduced to the IR2 losses of the wire. as per Sparky Sweet that field is essentially separate from the currant which becomes the property of incoherent  energy Quanta . when the primary electromagnet is reduced to induce motion into the secondary it releases that potential amount of reduction from the field in the same direction it was traveling in the first place. since it is traveling in the same direction it will be added into part G.

Now at the same time part G's reducing half is doing the exact same thing releasing it's reduced potential in the same direction it was traveling in the first place. now you have the reducing primaries potential added to the reducing potential of part G's inductor and at that very same time the secondaries potential will be added also. these potentials combined give an amplification to the rising  primaries boosting it's output to the secondaries.

since we all know that when an an inductor is increasing,  storing into it's magnetic field there will be a potential drop across the conductor. this is also true for the increasing primary electromagnet as they are storing into the magnetic field. as there will be a potential drop across both of them the potentials from the reducing magnetic field offsets these potential drop giving an amplification to the rising sides of the device.

this action happens twice in every rotation each reducing side feeding the increasing side in one half then the opposite takes place in the other half.

Marathonman

[marathonman]

This post is dedicated to the brain dead people that still think part G is resistors.

And i quote from Wikipedia on Inductance;

"Any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current."
That means larger inductor = less currant flow, smaller inductor = more currant flow and as the brush is constantly rotating so is the size of the inductor on either side of the brush.

Now do you understand Rswami.

now i think that is all i have to say about that. if you still don't get it i guess i am through with you to.