Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

I hate to say it but i really expected more from someone that has 1300 plus posts. i am really disappointed to say the least.
I have proved as so i thought that part G is an inductor but i guess some people just do not have what it takes to pursue a free energy device as others do and to think you would think a Physics professor would use heat death resistor is laughable at best. but then again you don't really care do you as you are here only to disrupt. i sure am glade i don't know where you live because you would be surprised what i can do to a person like you with my military training.

your a pathetic man if you could call yourself one. how much do you get paid to disrupt troll.
what the really funny part is i am here to just help people out and i can always leave but the most funny part is if you come to my home base you will get Ip blocked and banded for life. ha, ha, ha, ha ! and you can't stop me ever, ha, ha, ha, ha!
this web site was and always a home for troll loosers.

Marathonman

[Belfior]

You do not want resistors in this circuit (well at least in the G part you don't). You just need variable inductance that will resist changes in current.

This creates changes in flux and changes in flux means induced currEnt in the pickup coils

bucking N - N coils will produce the effect of magnet entering a coil and exiting a coil, if the current raises to MAX and then cuts off. Then current in the second primary starts from MAX and dies off.

This is something I am still trying to figure out. You need to have the current raising to MAX on the first coil, then switch at MAX to the second primary. How do I do this with solid state components? How do I start with MAX current in the second primary and not slowly raising current?

[seychelles]

MAYBE GO TO THIS SITE AND THAT WILL ENLIGHTEN YOU.http://sparkbangbuzz.com/mag-amp/mag-amp.htm

[marathonman]

Belfior;
Have you even read a single post in the last few weeks??
I have laid out in clear precise english how and why the primaries are raised and lowered in currant in unison so what seems to be the problem??
Generator do not start at MAX as you say, that would cause an immediate frying of the system. generators take a certain time to ramp up to max and this device being a generator is no exception.
there is NO RESISTORS in this system AT ALL and the total lack of understanding of this this system is really killing people.

The primaries are NEVER CUT OFF, they are raised and lowered in currant in an orderly fashion in unison as the brush rotates. they are NEVER taken below half way or to zero for that mater. that will cause induction to fail as the pressure between the primaries are to be maintained at all times and if not the induction will drop to that of the rising electromagnet.
the pressure between the primaries compresses the field lines to match that of a standard generators high intensity field and are raised and lowered in intensity only to induce motion into the secondary.

reviewing the last few weeks of post might help you but then again who knows.

regards,

Marathonman

[marathonman]

seychelles;
while being a good example at the same time it is not.
as a mag amp it uses the saturation of the core to control currant flow thus does not use the reduction of field to do any useful work.
on the other hand an inductor used in an active state can control currant with the use of reverse EMF that opposes the original currant flow. but that's not all, it stores and releases potential that can be used in a very positive manor to offset the potential drop of the rising side since it is storing into the field for the next half cycle.
this vary information is what i have been posting for weeks and all one has to do is open ones mind and absorb the information presented which is fact, proven on the bench and back by Physics and science not speculation and theories.

regards,

Marathonman