Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

 THAT'S BECAUSE IT IS NOT INDUCTIVE REACTANCE. it's just Inductance or rather SELF INDUCTANCE.

Quote "Once the voltage stabilizes"

OMG ! can you NOT read, it doesn't ever stabilize as the brush is constantly moving changing the magnetic flux to current ratio. this is what happens when you take a static Inductor to an active position in the circuit.
If the Inductor was a static device yes it would but it is NOT and is constantly changing it's contact that adds or subtracts winding's to that side of the circuit.
a static Inductor when hit with DC will curb the current for a short time, WHY ? because of self inductance then it will equalize if not other change in the circuit. so how do you get constant current control ?
by changing the contact as the brush rotates so the current never stabilizes. it constantly changes the magnetic flux to current ratio which is in complete compliance with Faraday's Laws of induction that states all that is needed for induction to take place is a change in magnetic field.
GUESS WHAT ? it just did as the brush rotates and it will oppose the original current flow, store and release magnetic potential from the field into the system to off set the potential of the rising side of the system.

I know you won't believe me but will you believe a PHD in Electrical Engineering. probably Not
your loss if not.

hell half of my quotes i got off of Wikipedia and other Physics sites so i guess they are wrong also. go tell them they are wrong and see the reaction you get. i need a good laugh right now.
Regards,
Marathonman

[pmgr]

PMGR,

I think you missed the whole point of my post.  Of course you can change flux by changing the number of turns of a coil.  I never said you couldn't.  What I see as foolishness is believing that changing the flux will have any effect on a DIRECT CURRENT.  If you know of a way to control DC current by changing the flux then please feel free to explain that.  Once the voltage stabilizes the only thing that will change the DC current is a change in the resistance of the circuit NOT the inductance as inductive reactance can't even be calculated if the current is DC.

Respectfully,Carroll

Dear Carroll,

I did not miss the point of your post. The issue is that you already assume a DC current from the start (t=0) while driving the circuit with a DC voltage source. The circuit will start up with a transient current and that transient will never converge to a DC value because the inductance is being changed continuously as a function of t (time). This is because there will be a voltage generated over the coil that is equal to d(flux)/dt=d(L*I)/dt.


So you have a DC voltage driving the circuit and a time varying voltage over the coil. As such the current will not be constant, but vary as well (and keep varying) over time as long as the inductance keeps varying.

These things can be very easily proven mathematically, or with a simulation.

PmgR

[lancaIV]

Dear Carroll,

I did not miss the point of your post. The issue is that you already assume a DC current from the start (t=0) while driving the circuit with a DC voltage source. The circuit will start up with a transient current and that transient will never converge to a DC value because the inductance is being changed continuously as a function of t (time). This is because there will be a voltage generated over the coil that is equal to d(flux)/dt=d(L*I)/dt.


So you have a DC voltage driving the circuit and a time varying voltage over the coil. As such the current will not be constant, but vary as well (and keep varying) over time as long as the inductance keeps varying.

These things can be very easily proven mathematically, or with a simulation.

PmgR

Or by physical experiment and results publication : go to espacenet
applicant: EdF which means Electricite de France 
superconductive circuit related and relatively "endless" electricity/plasma storage


a world without Ohms law and Kirchhoffs rules application possibility/need : 
no or low resistivity         Hypersonic velocity and with Teslas "dielectric"properties

[marathonman]

Very well put PMGR.
Regards,
Marathonman

[forest]

Yep well put , but again in theory. You would need like below micro-second switching time between one turn to another for real change in inductance