Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hanon]

Hi
@Hanon... maybe you interested in using my scheme, I added one more step, and a correction circuit of the peak of the waveform, (R4) when going through step 1 and step 9 giving the space of two steps as in the original patent from 1908 to soften the waveform... disregard the part they are only transistor to generate the waveform for my setup.

And thanks again for everything!!!

Hi Schiko,
I have not studied in deep your circuit yet, but the circuit that I posted -which was originally created by Patrick Kelly (in his ebook Chapter 3) and I have just done some small corrections- do the same sequence as the original Figuera rotary commutator with contacts 1,2,3 ....8,9,10 ....15, 16...(as Figuera wheel). Therefore this circuit make the right switching including the steps in the first and last contact  because it makes a pulse in 8 and later in 9 and then in 16 and 1. Maybe your circuit is an improvement but Kelly´s circuit do exactly what it is described in the 1908 commutator. This circuit just follow the contacts in Figuera´s drawing with the cylinder

I will study in deep shortly . It is good to have more variations to test, but I would start with Kelly´s design and later I would test your proposal

Regards

[Schiko]

@Hanon
No problem my friend...           just for the record, generate sine wave through the steps, much more steps better! 

@ARIOVALDO
Thank's 

@Bajac
You've built your H-bridge??? 

[hanon]

Hi all,

I attach here a patent about an overunity transformer filed by Carlos Subieta Garron (US3368141). If you read it you could see that he is looking for the same effect as the 1908 Figuera´s patent. Also I post two videos that you could find useful to understand the patent.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=orRvh4K8Qvc

www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8asKJNYJIY

Please post your comments about this patent

Regards

[bajac]

 It is just amazing!

If you recall, I also published "Reinventing the Wheel Part 2 and Part 3" showing designs with Permanent Magnets. The device shown in figures 4, 5, and 6 of Carlos' patent are almost identical to one of my embodiments that I posted in those documents. In my document I called coil B22 as the secondary and coils B18 to B21 as the control coils. The only difference between Carlos' design and mine is that he uses air gaps. Of course, my device would have not been patentable because they are obvious with respect to the devices shown in Carlos's patent. Again, I did not used air gaps in my design because I thought (as the mainstream science) that air gaps would make my design less efficient. Now that I know the Figuera's devices, I can say that Carlos' apparatus should be more efficient. As Figuera, Carlos found a way for minimizing the effects of the Lenz's law by using air gaps.

No wonder why I called my papers "Re-inventing the Wheel". We just keep recycling the old technology because it is not well known.

Bajac

[hanon]

It is just amazing!

If you recall, I also published "Reinventing the Wheel Part 2 and Part 3" showing designs with Permanent Magnets. The device shown in figures 4, 5, and 6 of Carlos' patent are almost identical to one of my embodiments that I posted in those documents. In my document I called coil B22 as the secondary and coils B18 to B21 as the control coils. The only difference between Carlos' design and mine is that he uses air gaps. Of course, my device would have not been patentable because they are obvious with respect to the devices shown in Carlos's patent. Again, I did not used air gaps in my design because I thought (as the mainstream science) that air gaps would make my design less efficient. Now that I know the Figuera's devices, I can say that Carlos' apparatus should be more efficient. As Figuera, Carlos found a way for minimizing the effects of the Lenz's law by using air gaps.

No wonder why I called my papers "Re-inventing the Wheel". We just keep recycling the old technology because it is not well known.

Bajac

Hi bajac,

Time ago I saw another patent of a MEG based on air gaps but I can not find it again. If I get to find it I will post it here also. Carlos Subieta Garron literally writes in his patent US3368141: "The assembly will not work as an annular magnet, there should be a small air gap between the core member and the shoe poles" (please note the attached drawing with the air gap !!). Air gaps are used to "re-route" the magnetic field to avoid opposing the inducer coils, thus minimizing the Lenz effect over those coils.

All this agree with you theory. Also the lay-out is very similar to the one that you propouse for Figuera 1908 generator.  . Some questions: Why do you think that this patent will be more efficient than Figuera generator?. Do you think that it is easier to build than Figuera´s device? (here it is only needed one AC input). Please can you elaborate your ideas a bit deeper?. Thanks for all your help!!

Regards