Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[ALVARO_CS]

Sorry for the mistake, I tried to edit my post, to attach a bigger image, but could not erase the small one.
Both are identical
(there is air gap between cores)

[NRamaswami]

ALVARO_CS

You have not marked the poles in both the figures..

The poles are like this NS - NS - NS   

The South pole of P1 faces the North pole of secondary and the south pole of secondary faces the North pole of P2.. Secondary is located between the two opposite poles of P1 and P2. Whether they are south or north does not matter as I do not know which one is south and which one is North and in any case in AC current poles reverse 50 times a second. But the poles must be opposite poles to enjoy the forces of magnetic attraction..

There is no magic here. We do not have any device that uses the forces of magnetic attraction. Look at an Induction Generator. It is an induction motor that uses the forces of magnetic repulsion but is boosted to rotate faster than the magnetic field to produce electricity due to mechanical energy imparted to it by mechanical means. Figuera clearly describes that this is not needed if we use the forces of magnetic attraction and since the charges between opposite poles are opposite charges, Lenz law is not applicable here.

If you send a rocket up, it needs a lot of energy to go up against gravity. when the energy is expended it stops and then falls back to earth. Its speed is initially zero and as it falls its speed keeps on increasing due to gravitational pull. Right..A body of fixed mass with increasing velocity would increase the energy of the body..So between opposite poles the increase of voltage and amperage is normal. There is no violation of law of physics as far as I can see it. There is no magic here. It is normal common sense and we find this to be experimentally correct.

Please do replicate the experiments and see for yourselves..I have not hidden any thing..

[Newton II]

@ALVARO_CS


That figure looks remarkable.  Such an arrangement should cause addition of fluxes from all wires  resulting in tremendous output from middle secondary.  Have you tried it?

[NRamaswami]

Newton II:

Not very tremendous..It increases by 6 times to 8 times. Higher the voltage, higher the amperage.

Hi Forest:

Yes,..You are correct that Hubbard device is similar to Figuera device..I'm working on it and I hope I can replicate it.. Let us wait and see.

[forest]

Hi Forest:

All wires are 4 sq mm wires that can carry up to 24 amps.

Both secondary and primary are only 4 sq mm wires.

We bought coils after coils of wires of 4 sq mm only. Then put them all together and wrapped up them to make a quadfilar coil. I do not remember the exact number of layers of primary but it was four layers and both primary sides had the same number of layers and same number of turns. Then the magnetic field strength is approximately equal.

However the resistor effect may be there due to the current circulating four times in the primary P1 first before it went to P2 where it circulated another four times before it returned to mains.

Will it have any effect? I really do not have any theoretical knowledge on this part. Nor do I have equipment to measure these things nor I have knowledge or experience in handling such equipment or even what those equipment are..

4 mm square ? that's quite thick wire, how big is you transformer then so it only consume 7 amps in primary ? sound like a lot of turns is required for that at 220V. To be completly clear may I ask : did you connected quadfilar once after finishing all layers of primary with 4 wires coming together or did that for each layer separately ? sorry, if it's obvious but I want to see all details.
Maybe would be possible to make small model of device for testing using thinner wires, for example one with 21 insulated strands