Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 119 Guests are viewing this topic.

hanon

Quote from: dieter on April 20, 2014, 06:52:54 PM
Hanon,


while I wil read the patent in your prev. link, could you please explain a little bit what's going on here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpZJfIIY7GE

Regards

I did that test trying to emulate a possilbe winding in the 1902 patent: a wire crossing between the two electromagnets. I feed 12 VDC and 1.2 A max. and I used a car relay to pulse the current. As output I could measure up to 60-70 VDC and up to 5-6 ADC  with a diode bridge in the output. I donĀ“t rely on those numbers because I could not light even a very  small bulb. I think that that my multimeter was showing wrong values as consequences of the pulsing pattern. Not much to take into consideration.

Regards

marathonman

Hanon,

I'm curious as to why you didn't use a cap after the bridge? and have you tried the quad electromagnet set up in your earlier post? and if you did what were your readings?

hanon

Quote from: marathonman on April 21, 2014, 07:55:28 AM
Hanon,

I'm curious as to why you didn't use a cap after the bridge? and have you tried the quad electromagnet set up in your earlier post? and if you did what were your readings?

Hi Marathonman,
I have not tested yet the crossed coils scheme. I just proposed it after watching a YouTube video from hyiq.org channel with two moving magnets inducing at the same time over a coil to optimize induction.

I have conclude that this configuration will only work in a motionless device if we are able to emulate "Induction by Motion" (flux lines cutting the wires) in our system . It will not work with induction by flux crossing the coil. IMHO the only way to emulate "induction by motion" in this system is with like poles facing each other and then swinging the fields as Figuera explained.

I will try to post a video about it  along this week.

Regards

marathonman

Does it not emulare flux by motion from raising and lowering the current mimicking a magnet movement to and fro ????? or am i looking at it wrong.
as i read it again does the north poles swing back and forth because they are opposite of one another varying in their intensities causing the side to side motion??????

dieter

Hanon,


ok, I see. The readings were pretty impressive tho. Reminded me of the output of a "reed stepup" circuit.


Marathonman,


when a magnet passes by a coil, pole to pole, it will induce positive current as long as you get closer, and negative when you move it away (or vice versa, depending on the magnet pole you use) , so this rise and fall may only mimick the motion if one prim. coil is positive and the other one negative, in other words, a setup with unlike poles.


But, whether like or unlike poles must be used, the good thing about it is, you only have to swap two wires to test both.


Regards