Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Cadman]

Mr .Ramaswami,

I believe English as a second language is the cause of many a dispute on these forums. English is weird, with much meaning derived from context.

I only verified that I could not get OU with a N-S device, but someone else may be able to. I think the N-N setup has more potential, and I will see if I'm right. This N-N device of mine does not exist yet, it's imaginary.

Yes, imagination, the creative thought process. To look at a core with magnets on the ends and to see in my minds eye the shape of the concentrated flux of the N-N opposition. To imagine that area of high flux, never decreasing in intensity or polarity, moving back and forth through another coil and inducing an emf at all times. Then imagining a N-S configuration with the flux of each inductor combining into one field, then the center of that field, at the bloch wall where the flux is the weakest, moving back and forth through another coil and inducing an emf.

I have a folder with all of your build info saved in it as well as the pdfs of P. Kelly. No disrespect but I think your device is an AC transformer, a very imaginative and clever transformer but not Figuera's generator.

Regards to you,
CM

[NRamaswami]

Thank you very much Mr. Cadman ...one of the rarest times I received compliments here..

The reason why you did not get cop>1 is very simple. The phase and frequency of both the primary coils must match  or otherwise we have the sum of separately measured voltages in secondary coils to be high but when we connect them all together the combined voltage is less than the sum of the voltages of secondary coils. The problem is solvable May be easily but I need to investigate verify and independently have it replicated and only then I can post an update.

And I have not disclosed all to be honest.

A self runner I believe is possible but Patrick indicated that it result in lightening strikes and so I did not do it.

Most of the theories stated here are well imaginative thoughts.

You are correct on NN being Lenz law free. But to do that you just need to apply your mind and experiment.

The 1902 patents are NN. You may try that to get NN to work.

Regards

Ramaswami

[hanon]

You are correct on NN being Lenz law free. But to do that you just need to apply your mind and experiment.

The 1902 patents are NN. You may try that to get NN to work.

Regards

Ramaswami

Am I reading fine? Is this bipolarity? Or just to create confusion? Now you have changed your argumentation. Two hours ago  NS polarity was your design.

I can only conclude that you want to create a mess to your followers. Good luck.

Figuera himself says the Part G can be replaced by a switch.

False.  Please copy the exact quote where that is stated, if you can find it.  I just want want the quote, not anymore

[NRamaswami]

Mr .Ramaswami,

I believe English as a second language is the cause of many a dispute on these forums. English is weird, with much meaning derived from context.

I only verified that I could not get OU with a N-S device, but someone else may be able to. I think the N-N setup has more potential, and I will see if I'm right. This N-N device of mine does not exist yet, it's imaginary.

Yes, imagination, the creative thought process. To look at a core with magnets on the ends and to see in my minds eye the shape of the concentrated flux of the N-N opposition. To imagine that area of high flux, never decreasing in intensity or polarity, moving back and forth through another coil and inducing an emf at all times. Then imagining a N-S configuration with the flux of each inductor combining into one field, then the center of that field, at the bloch wall where the flux is the weakest, moving back and forth through another coil and inducing an emf.

I have a folder with all of your build info saved in it as well as the pdfs of P. Kelly. No disrespect but I think your device is an AC transformer, a very imaginative and clever transformer but not Figuera's generator.

Regards to you,
CM

Mr. Cadman

I am afraid some of your statements are not correct to my limited observational knowledge.

Magnets have to oscillate or increase and decrease in strength to produce time varying magnetic field strength. Electricity is induced in a conductor subjected to time varying magnetic field strength is the observed law of induction. Intensity has to increase and decrease and higher the rate of change or higher the frequency higher is the induced emf in the secondary as per ohms law. Polarity need not change for NN type of devices to operate. Your statements are contrary to these principles.

Similarly regarding NS also your statements do not match my observations.

Regarding the Ramaswami device It is improved version of Figuera

Many here are constrained by theoretical knowledge and not mastering that as well. I learned from observations and had to do nearly 200 experiments and had to fail to learn step by step.

The 1908 patent hides a key component and 1902 patent where The poles are identical poles are edited as opposite poles. If you are particular about NN configuration please try them. Both 1902 patents are NN only.

Regards

Ramaswami

[wistiti]

Hanon, Doug and MM.
I have dismantle some selenoid for replicate this project....
The primary black 24/12 vdc are 83 ohm and the output yellow are 2,6 ohm.

Im now working on the "famous" g part...
Since no one want to share clear "diy" description of it,i will follow what is in the pjkbook...

Im all ears open for some advice...