Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Sam6]

MM

Perhaps an electronic part G approximation may work. If so, all you need a is a coil with several taps that connect to ground via switches (transistors or FETs) and have the ends of the coil connect to the negative side of the two exciter coils that are fed from the electronically controlled power supplies. The switches are easily synchronized with the sine wave generator as shown in the attached concept drawing. This is adapted from the drawing I posted on page 289. It only shows the changed pages.

I realize that you have posted copious explanations of how part G works and I understand what you are saying, but it seems unnecessary for the following reason. A generator is formed when a conductor cuts the flux lines of a magnetic field. It's the relative motion that matters. If two electromagnets have like poles facing across a coil, their fields collide somewhere between them and add, and if their relative strength is changed by changing their excitation voltages, the collision point moves toward the weaker field. If the electromagnets are excited by complementary waveforms, the collision point moves back and forth across the coil causing flux cutting due to the relative motion....and you have an AC generator with the frequency of the excitation voltages. It seems to me that the part G plays no part in that action and is not necessary. Perhaps my experiments will show me the reason why you say it ain't gonna work. 
Sam6

[marathonman]

Sam;

  I no longer find it necessary or desirable to post on this website as i do not enjoy rhetoric or foolishness posted from non-intelligent people that have no ambition what so ever in building this device and resort to third grade child like tactics to discredit or belittle someone.

as for your thought that part G can be replaced, well all i can say is when you fail at multiple attempts remember the words spoken from me, "I TOLD YOU SO"
you still don't understand the real workings of a generator thus will be your downfall in your replication.

good luck just the same and maybe i will see ya around.

regards,

Marathonman 

[forest]

MM

Perhaps an electronic part G approximation may work. If so, all you need a is a coil with several taps that connect to ground via switches (transistors or FETs) and have the ends of the coil connect to the negative side of the two exciter coils that are fed from the electronically controlled power supplies. The switches are easily synchronized with the sine wave generator as shown in the attached concept drawing. This is adapted from the drawing I posted on page 289. It only shows the changed pages.

I realize that you have posted copious explanations of how part G works and I understand what you are saying, but it seems unnecessary for the following reason. A generator is formed when a conductor cuts the flux lines of a magnetic field. It's the relative motion that matters. If two electromagnets have like poles facing across a coil, their fields collide somewhere between them and add, and if their relative strength is changed by changing their excitation voltages, the collision point moves toward the weaker field. If the electromagnets are excited by complementary waveforms, the collision point moves back and forth across the coil causing flux cutting due to the relative motion....and you have an AC generator with the frequency of the excitation voltages. It seems to me that the part G plays no part in that action and is not necessary. Perhaps my experiments will show me the reason why you say it ain't gonna work. 
Sam6

I agree to your explanation. I however do not believe it is the original Figuera concept. What we are discussing here is the evolved concept  developed further by Buforn. The original Figuera concept seems to me the way to move magnetic field (as was shown in other thread here) while keeping the fields  in NS NS NS pattern like in normal generators - by properly switching coils in sequence. If you read patent description it explains some weird parts.
Is your circuit really produce clean sinewaves at 180 degrees out of phase one to another ?

[forest]

Imho : for this idea (moving two opposing fields) to generate OU we have to go into high frequency.

[seychelles]

MY TWO BOBS WORTH, THIS INVENTION WILL NEVER WORK.
REASON BEING TO PUMP EFFER  THE MAGNETIC FIELD HAS TO BE
MOVING, NOT JUST PULSING OR VARYING IN INTENSITY..IT HAS TO BE
MOVING FROM A TO B..OTHERWISE IT IS JUST LIKE A TRANSFORMER..
THAT IS WHY I POSTED THIS IDEA AND I HAVE BEEN JEERED AT.