Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[Feynman]

@all

A friend has been doing some research on Synergetic theory and carbon-fusion and he pointed out something very interesting we should be aware of (the Auger Effect).  Basically, in plain english, the Auger Effect means that when an electron falls to a lower orbital , this does not always results in emission of a corresponding photon.  Sometimes an this may result in emission of an electron instead.  This may be important in terms of the 'activation energy' proposed by Synergetic theory (and also because we are dealing with energetic beta electrons in general).

Auger Effect

The Auger effect (pronounced /ˈÉ"ːÊ'Éš/, or Oh' jeh) is a phenomenon in physics in which the emission of an electron from an atom causes the emission of a second electron.[1] When an electron is removed from a core level of an atom, leaving a vacancy, an electron from a higher energy level may fall into the vacancy, resulting in a release of energy. Although sometimes this energy is released in the form of an emitted photon, the energy can also be transferred to another electron, which is ejected from the atom. This second ejected electron is called an Auger electron.[2]

Upon ejection the kinetic energy of the Auger electron corresponds to the difference between the energy of the initial electronic transition and the ionization energy for the electron shell from which the Auger electron was ejected. These energy levels depend on the type of atom and the chemical environment in which the atom was located. Auger electron spectroscopy involves the emission of Auger electrons by bombarding a sample with either X-rays or energetic electrons and measures the intensity of Auger electrons as a function of the Auger electron energy. The resulting spectra can be used to determine the identity of the emitting atoms and some information about their environment. Auger recombination is a similar Auger effect which occurs in semiconductors. An electron and electron hole (electron-hole pair) can recombine giving up their energy to an electron in the conduction band, increasing its energy. The reverse effect is known as impact ionization.

The name "Auger effect" comes from one of its discoverers, Pierre Victor Auger, and not from the similarly-named device, the auger.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auger_electrons


@sparks

Hey sparks, I'm not clear on exactly what you are saying, maybe you can elaborate on what you mean.  What would be the difference in mass conversion in conductor vs. semiconductor?

[sparks]

   @Fenyman

     I believe that if the whole atomic structure is considered as mass in the e=mc2 equation the electron hop from energy shell to energy shell represents a mass to energy conversion and vice versa.  We know that all atoms will fill their valence shell anyway they can.  The best conductors at natural temperatures all have 7 protons.  Copper Silver Gold.  This is because in order to fill their octet they need just one more electron. This electron is loosely bound in a magnetic dipole up down relationship with the rest of the electrons in the valence shells.  A change in the external magnetic field will influence the magnetic dipole moments of these eigth magnetically captured electrons.  When the magnetic dipole moments of these eighth electrons shift in response to the magnetic field change,  the up down bond with the 7th electron is broken and there is a shift in the valence shell orbitals.  A very minor shift but enough of a change in the atomic mass to plug into e=mc2.  Once the whole magnetic dipole moments of the rest of the atom adjusts to the new impressed magnetic field #8 settles back into an atomically dictated orbital.  But #8 took off first before the rest of the atomic mass could catch up.  So at any given moment or magnetic field situation coppers atomic weight is changing.  Lot easier then expending energy fighting the covalent electron sharing in carbon.

[AbbaRue]

From Naudin's experiments it's clear that the stronger the B-field the higher the power output.
What function does the B-field serve?
My understanding is that the magnetic field from pole to pole
redirects the beta particles towards the toroidal were it's collected.
Similar to the way the yoke of a TV set directs the electrons to strike the screen at just the right place.
So the higher the B-field the more beta is forced into the toroidal.

Do I understand this correctly?

If so then perhaps setting up a B-fields at each opening of the toroidal could direct all the beta into the toroid.
Or perhaps we could use the yoke off an old TV set to do some very interesting things with the beta.
I was trying to find out which pole of the magnet repels beta north or south, anyone know the answer?

As for Naudin using the thorated tungsten rods;
from looking up thorium, I understand it's not the thorium that produces the gamma
but the other isotopes it produces on decay.
In any case the tungsten rods worked well for Naudin and they are relatively inexpensive and easy to get.
At $7 a piece if you don't burn them up they will last a lifetime.

[sulake]

....1. From Naudin's experiments it's clear that the stronger the B-field the higher the power output.
2. What function does the B-field serve?
3. My understanding is that the magnetic field from pole to pole
redirects the beta particles towards the toroidal were it's collected.
Similar to the way the yoke of a TV set directs the electrons to strike the screen at just the right place.
So the higher the B-field the more beta is forced into the toroidal.
If so then perhaps setting up a B-fields at each opening of the toroidal could direct all the beta into the toroid.

My personal point of view on this...

1. Yes correct. Departing particles (photon, electron etc.) may have different speeds. The higher the speed is, the higher B-field is needed to capture the particle. Or to hold it inside the coil. Just like a rocket trying leave earths gravity field.

2. Capture departing or radiating particles and guide them to the carbon rod where the period of decay ends, and electrons are added to the current flow, increasing it.

3. What is it with these toroids!?! This is not a TPU of any kind. Many many devices (amplifiers etc.) have toroidal transformers. Those are good because they don't have allmost at all external magnetic field and they are very efficient. Toroidal transformer can not capture particles unless they hit straight to it, because no external mag. field.
This toroidal transformer is in Naudin's VSG setup only for measurement purposes! It does not give out power, but merely a small signal that can be measured with oscilloscope.

[Ww.We]

@sparks

Are You suggesting that we should try gold/silver/copper instead of carbon? The same setup, just switch the reaction-element to one of these conductors?

@sulake

Give us a clue on what would be the best suggested coil. A spherical coil perhaps?
Or a tube?