Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[sulake]

...Probably a sharp <=5kHz sqaure zap via a set of (copper?) wires through the copper coil which will produce more energy in the coil than the zap is worth.
The only problem is - why aren't we doing it with common transformers already?

You can not just take a common transformer like from your audio amplifier that has a toroidal transformer. It is designed for another frequency and the efficiency will rapidly drop down if the frequency changes? Definitely in this setup where the current must rise extremely fast. Inductance will resist this fast current rise. So the transformer must not have inductance witch means that it must have only just few primary turns. And that is bad efficiency I think? I will soon test an old welding transformer backwards, feed the secondary that has wery thick wire and just few turns to get higher voltage out..

About obtaining the materials for experiments.
I have also bought gouging electrodes (8mm) that have copper coating. I then removed the copper coating with the same sodium persulfate that I use to etch my circuit boards. I’m now milling the carbon rods to make a different kind of “reactor” if you can call it that.

It would be nice to hear about your experiments and perhaps pictures.

http://www.alibaba.com/product-free/11083936/Carbon_Welding_Electrodes_Gouging_Electrode_.html

[sparks]

   I  hope that the below pic will explain the similarities in the work I see going on in this thread.  The 5khz limitation I mentioned is because of the reaction time needed for the weak magnetic ambient conditions in a natural magnetic field like you would have on a bench top.  The below diagram concentrates the magnetic field disruption at much higher frequencies but this is experienced by a gas which forms a plasma.  The plasma creates it's own magnetic field.

[Koen1]

I'm sorry, perhaps I am just not getting the connection,
but why do people keep trying to turn this into a TPU or
POD or other "OU transformer" idea?

I thought the theory of mr Vall?e is pretty clear and convincing,
and Naudins experiments seem to substantiate the theory...
So why don't we stick to that theory?
Why would we want to throw away that theory and try to turn
it into a TPU/POD type interpretation?

And as far as I know the TPU and POD are both devices that have
enjoyed quite some interest in the recent past, but in the end
only one or two of the hundreds of people that tinkered with the things
actually managed to get close to the claimed output results,
and the operating principles, exact construction details and specific
tuning details are often still subject of speculation and debate,
so it seems those devices are far from understood...
Or at least, if that understanding does exist, it does not appear
to be present in most of the discussion groups and threads where
those devices are discussed...

I'm not principally opposed to the TPU or the POD, in case you got that
impression, but I do feel very strongly that if Sparks or anyone else
thinks they know how they work and how to build working versions that
actually produce OU, then they should come forward and tell us exactly
how to replicate one that works. Otherwise it just stays in the realm of
speculation about those devices, and they will remain "interesting ideas"
instead of "OU devices".
So far I have heard various theories about them, but seen no actual
working versions except for those of the original "inventors" (Marks for the
TPU and Harwood for the POD).

I see zero reason for just dismissing Vall?e's theory in favour of some speculative
TPU- or pulsed transformer style idea.
It may be that a pulsed tansformer could produce OU, but is that really what we
were talking about? I thought we were talking about stimulated artificial beta emission...
And Vall?e gives a brief overview of several elements that qualify for such a Protelf
reaction, based on slightly more than the simple fact that the elements are good conductors.
Silver, copper and gold are not among those in his overview.

But hey, perhaps I misunderstood the fairly cryptic statements Sparks dropped...?

[sparks]

@Koen1


     I must apologize for clouding this thread.  There were a #of persons here that mentioned welding transformers and of course the spark gaps created when you weld as well as a torroidal coil placed around a current carrying conductor not being a tpu.  I thought by posting my experiment a similarity in the dynamics would be appreciated.  Just can't resist this one more "spark".   If you are a welder:  what uses more energy to change stainless steel into a gas.  A carbon cut rod or a plazma cutter ?.  Seeya.

[AquariuZ]

Juan is the original poster, aka Tesla_2006.  He is the one who made that monster 60 kW power source using this technology (the picture I posted).  That device is self-powering, and yes!, it's generating 60 kilowatts of power from 'thin air'. 

Come now Feynman, please share EVERYTHING you know about this box.

Do you have proof it is self-powering and generating 60kWh? Measurements?

If so POST POST POST or send a link where to find more information please

Blueprints, parts lists, manufacturers

Is Juan in Spain or South America? If in Spain I am going to try and hook up real world.

Come on now, please back up these claims!!!

AZ