Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[Feynman]

@aleks

Okay, I will call you "armchair theorist" since all you seem to do is post nonsense without bothering to build anything.  No one said you had to use high voltage.  I think you are just making excuses.

Believe me, they won't find [Higgs], or at least it won't change our world.

Which is it? 

If it was so 'easy' as you are trying to say why we are not running overunity devices already?

Oh do tell me you are not this naive.  Have you even bothered to read a cursory history of this field?  TT Brown, Moray, etc?

If those bosons can only be detected in LHC, your and those guy's theory is even in a bigger trouble.

By all means, please explain why. And who's theory?   It seems you don't even want to have an academic discussion.  It's much easier to troll around ranting about phonons than to actually discuss the mathematical details, isn't it.

I still think you do not understand the whole political footprint of modern science.

HAH!  I think you are a troll or else just an idiot.  The 'political footprint of modern science' is control by powerful institutions with agendas and money.  You are telling me I don't understand that?  All you seem to do is post your 'theories' and claims of 'phonon' energy and other such nonsense without bothering to

a) build ANYTHING at all   
b) back up your claims with primary source research
c) tolerate people which you do not agree with

You can do as you please, but please stay the hell away from my posts.  I am trying to build a self-powering device with those builders who do not care for armchair theorists.  Theories are a dime a dozen, but people with the guts to sacrifice their own time and money for a cause are far more scarce.

[aleks]

Okay, I will call you "armchair theorist" since all you seem to do is post nonsense without bothering to build anything.  No one said you had to use high voltage.  I think you are just making excuses.

Well, it's up to you to consider my ideas or not. Beside that you are repeating my own ideas. Short rise time is more important than voltage. And well, you need power (number of moving electrons) not high voltage alone: this is obvious if you consider phonon (kinetic) interaction of electrons and atoms.

Unfortunately you've started to call me bad words: I have not deserved it I think. Reader of internet posts can always ignore posts of others.

And of course phonon (kinetic) impacts is the only way to overunity (I've given enough information and links to support that idea - read my posts via my profile if you want to). Sorry if you do not like this. Call me wrong or anything, but do not try to say I know nothing or writing non-sense. Non-sense is always non-sense to you yourself in the first place. It can simply be out of your current mental reach or understanding.

[Feynman]

I am repeating your ideas?  Wow, that is an arrogant statement.  If you choose to build ANYTHING at all I would reconsider my designation of 'armchair theorist'.  I think anyone who reads this board can tell that there are people who build and experiment, and there are people who sit around and try to direct others with their theories.  You are one of the latter.

Regarding Bremsstrahlung, you neglect to mention the calculation only applies in uniform plasma.  Furthermore, w=0 is not "DC".  Please do not misrepresent the mathematics to support your claims.

[aleks]

I am repeating your ideas?  Wow, that is an arrogant statement.  If you choose to build ANYTHING at all I would reconsider my designation of 'armchair theorist'.

You could call me like that from the very start. Of course all I do is giving ideas. Direction? It's up to you, I'm at no power to "direct" anyone here, it's a paranoia to think I can direct anybody via my posts.

Regarding Bremsstrahlung, you neglect to mention the calculation only applies in uniform plasma.  Furthermore, w=0 is not "DC".  Please do not misrepresent the mathematics to support your claims.

Study Fourier transform. w=0 is DC when applied to voltage analysis. Since there is no good term for w=0 when applied to acoustics I've decided to use term DC. Name yours. "w=0 acoustic waves"? What's the difference between thermal Bremsstrahlung in uniform plasma and any other state of matter when electron-atom collisions are considered? There are no plots for Bremsstrahlung in non-plasma metals or gases on that page available. If you can find it let me know. If you can prove the available plot is not applicable to non-plasma states, let me know, too. (do not forget that spark gap produces ionised channel in gas which closely resembles gas plasma).

Here is an interesting talk I've found: http://www.bautforum.com/archive/index.php/t-40947.html

[Feynman]

Time and again, I see you posting on other people's threads, trying to fit whatever the topic is into your framework, as if somehow this will provide you with proximity when the invariable self-powering operation becomes replicated by a member here.  Since you have absolutely no construction skills or practical knowledge, and your theoretical knowledge is filled with holes, I'm afraid theoretical proximity is as close as you'll ever get.

Regarding your w=0 is DC claim, sorry, you are incorrect. w is the angular frequency. I know what Fourier Transforms are; I worked with them for years. You've "decided to use the term" DC, eh?  You clearly don't know what the hell you are talking about.  Please take your nonsense elsewhere. Thanks.