Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[aleks]

http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/aot.htm

Thanks. I do not have problems with arrow of time. If we represent our physical reality as a 3D scalar field matrix which is processed by convolution or some non-linear function applied to each element of the matrix, then each full matrix convolution/calculation pass will resemble a step in time, with the next state of this 3D matrix being fully dependent on the previous state and the functions used. So, time can be both unidirectional and bidirectional: you can kick ball back and forth easily, but you'll have problems reversing rotation of Sun. "Guards" of humanity see the future, because there are phantom realities exist where you can see future like knowing what happens next based on the current state of the matrix without living there for real. It's a basis of consiousness and awareness: without past there is no future, without future there is no existence.

[Feynman]

@Yucca

I was wondering the same thing myself (whether this scales down). I suspect there is probably a minimum energy threshold which must be exceeded.  The only way to find out for sure is to do some tests though.

I would like to make a couple of comments on your setup, which looks very good.  According to the Vall?e, we should expect several things in order for the reaction to proceed:

1) A carbon source of sufficient purity
2) A source of gamma rays to initiate the main reaction (perhaps 2.2% thoriated tungsten)
3) Some carbon in gaseous phase in order to initiate the electron-capture.
4) A colinear B-field to align the spins of the carbon atoms and to direct escaping beta electrons.

You may need to include the thoriated tungsten rod at the anode in order to get a small source of gamma rays to initiate the reaction. You may also need to add a small spark gap to get some carbon atoms in gaseous phase. Assuming these criteria are met, it should be possible to achieve Protelf fusion. We have not had a chance to test the effect of the spark gap or tungsten rod on the output energy, but we may have some results this weekend (aka is background radiation in microsieverts sufficient, or do we need the thoriated tungsten? do we really need the spark gap?  etc).

Naudin has used 35V at 80,000uF.  Juan was using an unknown discharge voltage.  My setup will be variable 0-1000V at 10-20uF. Unclefester is going to use E-core transformer configurable voltage via PWM.

Hope this helps.

[hartiberlin]

Caution with dealing with user:
Tesla_2006


I got this email:

Gday Harti,
I responded to a post by Tesla_2006 regarding plans for MEG device.
Here is his reply,
"Hello XXXXX, ok I know now the power level you want for this, the first you must to do is get a common power transformer in that range you want from 1 to 10 KVA, 60 Hz because that is builded for that power levels
The maximun COP of this transformer Device is as a mentioned is 3, only in ferrite high frequency devices they can get 5 or more for another phenomena included, the device I send the photo was of a 100 watt transformer to 50 Hz, I rise the power level output to 500 watts and of corse in closed Loop, starting battery powered to 180 watts aprox, output for 500 watts and for close the loop th output support up to 300 watts, I use a 100 watt incandescent bulb for many months, that was the firsts models we build here many years ago

I will send documents and circuits, theory , practical and metodology for get a sucessfull final static device

We can do an exchange, this days I am working in many systems and I need pieces and materials, single pieces, not new, principally are computer pieces and electronic pieces, I can send a listing of that things I need and you choice any of there and we make a cultural exchange for this

Meanwhile I am adapting my documents for a top of 10 KVA device, but I send indications for more power levels

Thanks, regards


Juan"

I did not respond to this email because I thought this is very dubious.

XXXXX

[UncleFester]

@UncleFester

Did you ever try periodically reversing the polarity on the carbon/tungsten rods to see if it would remove the carbon dust accumulation?

I did not Duff. But it sounds like it's worth a try as well. I am setup again, just digging circuits out of storage and I should be ready to go.

Tad

[hartiberlin]

Another complain against user:
Tesla_2006
just copying other?s work and trying to sell it under his own name:


Hallo lieber Stefan,

ich bin Mitglieder "xxxxxxxxxxx" und m?chte Dich gratulieren f?r dein overunity site, sehr reich und weltweit gesch?tzt.

Ich sende kaum Nachrichten im Forum weil ich bin von jenen die lieber probieren, einen echt nicht-konventionnellen Effekt zu erreichen, bevor etwas zu benachrichtigen. Es gibt leider zuviel Botschaften die leider nichts seri?s bringen, und dies f?hrt zum Diskredit der freie Energie. Obwohl das Forum-Konzept mit Gedankenaustausch doch sehr n?tzlich ist.

In diesem Sinn m?chte ich Dir warnen, ?ber Mitteilungen von einem "Tesla_2006" Mitglied.
Was er sagt ?ber das 1.3 MV Experiment ist was man auf Franz?sisch als PLAGIAT nennt (weiss das Wort auf Deutsch nicht). Ich hatte ihm in privaten Telefon und Mail-Austausch in April 2005 ?ber diesen Effekt informiert. Der echte Erfinder dieses Effekt heisst Ludwig S?ll?s und er hat seine Forschung auf Internet in 1998 ver?ffentlicht. Ich habe alle Dokumente dar?ber und kann Dir Kopien schicken. Jetzt sagt er im Forum dass ER hat dieses Experiment mit Erfolg realisiert, etc. ohne irgendeine Photos or Labor-Berichte geliefert zu haben, und OHNE LUDWIG SULLOS zu nennen. Sehr schlimm.

Jetzt h?tte ein weiterer Megawatt2007 das Experiment nachgebaut, aber ich vermute zu 99,99% dass es um denselben Tesla_2006 geht. Er verwendet dieselbe Formulierung der S?tze und sagt man braucht keinen Bericht, dass es einfach ist, etc. Jeder Techniker weiss dass 1.3 MV DC nicht gerade einfach zu erzeugen ist. Diese Mail von Megawatt2007 ist gerade einige Tage nach meiner Warnung zu Tesla_2006 gekommen, dass es nicht fair ist, etwas als von ihm entwickeltes vorzustellen, ohne den echten Autor zu nennen.

Es w?re nett, auch f?r die Kredibilit?t deines Forums, solche Mitteilungen zu sperren oder mindestens mit der Wahrheit zu korrigieren. Aber Du bist nat?rlich frei den Fall deiner Ansicht zu betrachten.

Der Grund ich m?chte nicht dass falsche Nachrichten ?ber dieses Experiment sich fortpflanzen, liegt darin, ich bin Mitarbeiter von S?ll?s in diesem Experiment seit 2 Jahren, um weitere Fortschritte zu erreichen. Wir m?chten dar?ber erst berichten, wenn wirklich der Effekt definitiv demonstriert wird. Es geht um ein sehr empfindliches Thema, weil es zu eine L?sung zur Alternativen Propulsion f?hren kann, neben den normalen irdischen Generatoren.

Ich danke Dir f?r dein Verst?ndnis, und bleibe selbstverst?ndlich zur Verf?gung f?r irgendeine Auskunft.

Freundliche Gr?sse, keep your good work,

xxxxxx


==============

See also:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1446.msg25091.html#msg25091

==============

I have now banned user Tesla_2006
for this reason.

Regards, Stefan.