Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Feynman

Since we are doing e-mail postings, I will go ahead and publish some of my correspondence.  It is possible user Tesla_2006 is copying someone else's research and passing it off as his own.  I am really not sure. Here is the info and you can decide for yourself.

QuoteDate: May 1st 2008
From: feynman
To: gigawattsgratis@123mail.cl, jarayam@latinmail.com
Message:
Hi, I am Feynman from overunity.com.  I noticed your thread on Carbon to Boron.  Can you please explain schematics for your circuits?  I would like to know about the capacitor discharge into a carbon rod as well as the use of NMR at 21Mhz.

Thank you.

source:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1310.0/topicseen.html


QuoteDate: May 1st 2008
From: energratis@inbox.com
To: feynman
Hello Feynman

Thanks for see my cultural contributions about the carbon nuclear device, my name is Juan and I am placed in Chile

Any general question about this I can answer for free, more details are here
 
http://www.nuenergy.org/pdf/electronically-activated-radioisotopic-carbon-generator.pdf



I was in the past in a company we build and send this device type to many companies in the world, the first carbon nuclear device I build was of 6 KW

For specific detailed information such as schemes, circuits, etc, we can do a cultural exchange for pieces or components I need this days for test others devices I build and test this days, in fact, I can send a listing of that things and you choice some thing for that cultural exchange

  I send you a picture of a nuclear device of this type we send some time ago to germany, it was of 60 KW, you can see there 10 toroids, each toroid delivers 6 KW at 220 VAC, 50 Hz, all in paralell, the carbon rods are inside of the toroids

About NMR at 21 MHz for size, weight reasons I've buideld few units and I am sorting some data I wait to heve more time for upload that files to my web site

May be in the future I can send a builded unit

From what country you writte?

Juan Arturo

the attached picture:



I have not heard back since May 1st.  Make of it what you will...



AbbaRue

Doing search for toroidal cores I read some cores are made from silicon steel ribbon wound into a core.
I wonder how cheap that route would be for making our own. 
Get some 1" steel strapping and make any size core we want.

I was puzzled about the photo of the 60kw unit, I couldn't see were the carbon core went in.
That last post mentioned that it's inside the toroid, interesting.

I should have my 82,000uF caps soon.


Yucca

Quote from: Feynman on May 07, 2008, 12:08:42 PM
@Yucca

I was wondering the same thing myself (whether this scales down). I suspect there is probably a minimum energy threshold which must be exceeded.  The only way to find out for sure is to do some tests though.

I would like to make a couple of comments on your setup, which looks very good.  According to the Vall?e, we should expect several things in order for the reaction to proceed:

1) A carbon source of sufficient purity
2) A source of gamma rays to initiate the main reaction (perhaps 2.2% thoriated tungsten)
3) Some carbon in gaseous phase in order to initiate the electron-capture.
4) A colinear B-field to align the spins of the carbon atoms and to direct escaping beta electrons.

You may need to include the thoriated tungsten rod at the anode in order to get a small source of gamma rays to initiate the reaction. You may also need to add a small spark gap to get some carbon atoms in gaseous phase. Assuming these criteria are met, it should be possible to achieve Protelf fusion. We have not had a chance to test the effect of the spark gap or tungsten rod on the output energy, but we may have some results this weekend (aka is background radiation in microsieverts sufficient, or do we need the thoriated tungsten? do we really need the spark gap?  etc).

Naudin has used 35V at 80,000uF.  Juan was using an unknown discharge voltage.  My setup will be variable 0-1000V at 10-20uF. Unclefester is going to use E-core transformer configurable voltage via PWM.

Hope this helps.

Hi Feynman, I won't do any serious attempt until I get a geiger counter, I've always wanted one and now I kind of have an excuse to get one. My wifes not too happy about talk of radioactivity! :)

I'm not sure how pure my carbon is, probably not too pure, especially after it sat in electrinium sludge for a year or two? If it doesn't work I'll order some decent spectroscopy grade carbon rods.

So I guess Juan uses a much higher discharge voltage to get away without using gamma source? I wonder if a cap and trigger coil like a camera flash circuit would provide a good enough pulse to initiate the reaction without the need for gamma? I'll probably give it a shot (pardon the pun).

A carbon point spark gap should provide gaseous phase carbon using a HV discharge pulse.

Colinear B-Field, so can it be provided by DC bias in the toroid, or would a seperate coil around the rod/s be better? I'm guessing you can't use a permanent magnet to get this field.

All the best of luck with your replication, I will watch the results thread like a hawk! may the heavens open for you.

Feynman

@Abba
Did you take a look at Naudin's experiments?   Sounds good about the caps, should be interesting!


@Yucca

QuoteMy wifes not too happy about talk of radioactivity!
Tell her its electrons.   There is no gamma, alpha or x-ray emissions. Only electrons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_particle

Many beta emitters are used in medicine to diagnose and treat disease, such as in PET scans.  In fact, the glow-in-the-dark paint on your alarm clock or watch emits beta particles. 

Of course we should always err on the side of caution, so simply use some plexiglass shielding.


QuoteI'm not sure how pure my carbon is

The 'pure' carbon is what Naudin et al says, though if I had to bet money, I'd bet your carbon would be okay. As for the gamma source, I am not clear on this yet.  Most of the existing literature is in French and I have not been able to translate so far. I think the plan is to use thoriated tungsten for the anode, but it's possible this is not necessary. That would be excellent experiment... compare equivilent discharge using standard carbon vs. thoriated tungsten electrode. I really don't know the answer, but hopefully we will find out over the next several weeks!

Also the same applies for the spark gap, we probably should try experiments with and without the spark gap see the effect on the output.

Quote
A carbon point spark gap should provide gaseous phase carbon using a HV discharge pulse.
Agreed

QuoteColinear B-Field, so can it be provided by DC bias in the toroid, or would a seperate coil around the rod/s be better? I'm guessing you can't use a permanent magnet to get this field.
Good question, I didn't even think of that.  You might be able to use a permanent magnet to deflect the electrons along a certain path, but you'd still have to collect them at some point I think.   What we are thinking now is to provide the DC bias in the collector toroid rather than directly via a coil on the carbon rod.  Or maybe even use both.  However, I don't think any of us have any idea how these differences will affect things.  ;)  Another area that is ripe for experiments.  ;D

Quotemay the heavens open for you.
Thank you , I hope they open for all of us.  :D




Yucca

Quote from: AbbaRue on May 07, 2008, 03:03:11 PM
Doing search for toroidal cores I read some cores are made from silicon steel ribbon wound into a core.
I wonder how cheap that route would be for making our own. 
Get some 1" steel strapping and make any size core we want.

I was puzzled about the photo of the 60kw unit, I couldn't see were the carbon core went in.
That last post mentioned that it's inside the toroid, interesting.

I should have my 82,000uF caps soon.

Hi AbbaRue, I have such a core here, it was a PSU from audio amp I found in the rubbish, primary winding had shorted. I like your idea of making cores! You will need to wind it tight and also keep the ends secured, this one is spot welded at the ends but you may get away with good epoxy on the last inch or two of the strip if you rough it up with sandpaper. You could also pad the core with cloth strips prior to winding wire on it to soften the corners.