Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Koen1

Dudes, it seems the thread is getting increasingly vague.

What we had was a fairly clear setup and claimed over unity in the circuit.
And we had what seemed to be the theory behind it, which suggests beta.

Now there is a lot of confusion about the beta, and a lot of talk of EMI.
Could be EMI. Fine with me.

But the main thing was OU in the circuit. Whether the OU is produced by abnormal
beta emissions, or by peculiar EMI, matters not one iota as long as we have OU
in the circuit.
Hell, the OU can be produced by leprechauns on acid for all I care! ;)
As long as it's there, in the circuit, and we can really use the energy,
I don't really care where it's from.

More important is: who is now still getting OU readings, and what exactly is their setup?
Forget the Geiger counters and the beta readings. If they're there, well, cool, but
if they're not well no loss.
As long as we get more out than in and can make that system run off its own power,
and still have a little bit left over as real free excess energy, then the game is on.

So can we please once and for all very clearly get a hands up on who's actually
got a circuit that self-powers or at least shows more output than input?
And can we then please keep the descriptions of these circuits clear and precise?

Thanks. ;)

ramset

Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

bluedemon

Quote from: Koen1 on May 27, 2008, 10:22:46 AM
Dudes, it seems the thread is getting increasingly vague.

What we had was a fairly clear setup and claimed over unity in the circuit.
And we had what seemed to be the theory behind it, which suggests beta.

Now there is a lot of confusion about the beta, and a lot of talk of EMI.
Could be EMI. Fine with me.

But the main thing was OU in the circuit. Whether the OU is produced by abnormal
beta emissions, or by peculiar EMI, matters not one iota as long as we have OU
in the circuit.
Hell, the OU can be produced by leprechauns on acid for all I care! ;)
As long as it's there, in the circuit, and we can really use the energy,
I don't really care where it's from.

More important is: who is now still getting OU readings, and what exactly is their setup?
Forget the Geiger counters and the beta readings. If they're there, well, cool, but
if they're not well no loss.
As long as we get more out than in and can make that system run off its own power,
and still have a little bit left over as real free excess energy, then the game is on.

So can we please once and for all very clearly get a hands up on who's actually
got a circuit that self-powers or at least shows more output than input?
And can we then please keep the descriptions of these circuits clear and precise?

Thanks. ;)

So far it seems that Allcanadian and Uncle Fester are the only ones here who have experienced the runaway effect.  They are also the ones who seem to be chasing the OU effect instead of fighting over apples and radioactive oranges.   It would be nice to get some detailed schematics & pics of their test setups, but I'm not complaining because I don't have the time and resources to do any tests myself.  Hopefully they will post more details as they get a better handle on what setup produces the better results.  In the meantime I'm wishing them good luck and I hope this turns out to be what we all hope it is.

tagor

Quote from: Koen1 on May 27, 2008, 10:22:46 AM

What we had was a fairly clear setup and claimed over unity in the circuit.



are you sure ?

Quote

And we had what seemed to be the theory behind it, which suggests beta.


are you sure ?

tagor

Quote from: bluedemon on May 27, 2008, 11:11:48 AM
 It would be nice to get some detailed schematics & pics of their test setups, but I'm not complaining because

Yes it would be very very very nice