Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

k4zep

Quote from: k4zep on June 22, 2008, 03:31:04 AM
3:00 a.m.  Have done a lot of experimenting tonight, have much to digest.............have a lot of thinking and things to recheck before I come to any conclusions with any certainty.  Have seen a lot I can not explain, have a much better understanding of workings, basically when small cap used, very short pulse in and out, would have to be a high frequency device.  This causes all sorts of new electronic design problems. I wonder what the freq. of  the 6 watt unit was?   have seen ideas and statements I have to digest, I have to recheck this integration into the toroid and reaction that causes full sine wave production effect from 1/2 wave burst effect.......Arrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhh Charley Brown.

Ben

Morning all,

4 hours sleep, 2 more hours thinking.  Verified last night that what we basically have is a RC time constant discharge circuit.  This produces a pulse and a waveform across the toroid as a simple transformer with a high current low voltage pulse in the primary (carbon 1 turn) and the resultant Higher voltage lower current in the secondary (multi turn).  Up to this point, it is just a normal toroid transformer with a very low resistance/impedance on the primary.  If you remove the carbon and use a simple wire through the toroid, that is what you get and the basic time constant is there. 

According to trial and error data, it requires a basic pulse with at least 110J of energy to kick start a particular carbon rod into the reactive process and then this output adds to the pure RC time constant waveform that we then see as added output. I suspect that 110J is for a particular size rod and not a written in stone quantity.  The 6 watt self runner would indicate that this is a reasonable deduction. 

If you want a sine wave, you have to take the the inductance in the secondary, the RC time constant and the burst time constant into consideration. If you just want to look at the burst, then the resistance and cap. value can vary and the transformer ratio is just for voltage amplification as long as you have enough energy density in the rod to initiate the reaction.

As Uncle Fester has noted, there is a rapid rise in energy and then a rapid drop in energy during this time constant/discharge period, probably a snapping action as the reaction is initiated and then as the current density falls below the theoretical trigger level the rapid recombining of elements happens and this resets the status quo.  If this pulsing is done on a 50% duty cycle and at the correct power levels, the natural integration of the pulses in the inductive output coil of the toroid and core interaction results in a sort of sine wave output. 


At this point, things become very complex, as Uncle Fester says, the theory is very simple, doing it is a SOB especially until you find the right rod!!!!!........................to be continued...........Got to eat some breakfast and drink some coffee.

Ben

tishatang

@UncleFester and All

Do you suppose that this process transmutes carbon into iron?  Go here and see:

http://amasci.com/freenrg/carbiron.html

In those experiments, they used relative low volts and high amps.  Here we are using High voltage bursts.  Maybe transmutation is causing runaway or other abnormalities?

Tishatanag

AbbaRue

@k4zep
How did you capture a picture of the wave form, it looks like your using a regular scope?
If you were using a digital camera set on video, what resolution did you have it set at?

I'm hoping to find some coal down at the beach today, will cut it into rods.
Coal should have a higher resistance.
The welding rods are only 0.2 ohms per foot, and the toroid is only 1 inch wide.
Lots of waisted output using that.
I also tried cutting a graphite rod 6mm dia. 70cm long but the resistance was to low to measure.
The pencil lead sounds pretty good, how does it hold out, does it fry right away?

k4zep

Hi AR,

Used a small Sony Cyber Shot camera on low light settings.  Kept taking pictures till I got lucky. 

Will try and post a video much later today or tomorrow.  Wife wants me to go out shopping with her and I guess I need a break too.

Have changed over to a 4 uf good to 4000VDC.  I can say the pencil lead @ 2", 4ohms holds up well with a 1KV voltage pulse.
Thats about 2 J/ pulse.  Looking to pick up more lead pencil lead today when I go out too.

I agree the basic setup with a narrow toroid and a long carbon rod physically doesn't look to take advantage of maximum induction effects there!  I hope all the folk trying this keeps at it....IF I find a readily available rod that works even at low levels, will let all know.
I am also considering a bifilar wound toroid coil.  One for the bias and one for power pickup.  Then too, any one know if a simple bifilar wound coil right on the carbon again one for bias and one for power would work or not?

As a final thought could not a third winding, low impedance say 4-10 turn #8-10 wire in series with the cap and reactor, with polarity additive would it not add positive feedback to the loop and increase the output?  Again, I don't know how much actual OU this device can be yet.



Ben




eldarion

@UncleFester, k4zep,

I finally got around to testing my setup here.  I get the attached waveform on a tiny toroidal coil with maybe 20 turns placed around the carbon rod.  This looks like a small part of the reaction starting, correct?  The rod makes a very loud clicking sound on every discharge...

I know my power levels are way too small right now, and the toroidal transformer is the wrong type (correctly sized transformer is in the mail), but here are the details of my setup anyway:
240uF @ 160V photoflash capacitor bank
Fired at 40Hz with an 800A 1200V IGBT with custom driver setup
Input power 13.8V @ 2.75A into a 120V inverter; rectified to charge capacitor bank

Next step is to increase the voltage, probably with some sort of voltage multiplier circuit on the AC output of the inverter.

Any thoughts? ;D

Eldarion
"The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly; it is dearness only that gives everything its value."
-- Thomas Paine