Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Yucca

Quote from: aleks on May 22, 2008, 12:42:19 PM
JLN has these "gaussian" pulses (http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/vsg41.htm). If you convert timeline into log scale you'll see it. In fact, it's the "kick" we are probably looking for. Note that Dirac delta function is also modeled via gaussian curve. So, there some correlation available between transient time and power and the output. Among local experimenters only Otto was able to achieve these gaussian pulses on his o-scope.

It may sound a bit "sci fi", but I think these gaussian curves have something to do with space-time curvature. Otherwise it's pretty hard to envision natural physical process whose intensity varies over logarithmic timescale and in fact replicates gaussian curve (I just wonder if it affects past time since gaussian curve is known to have infinite span).

Gaussian pulses are very natural,  a photon has a gaussian energy envelope. Any other shaped pulses tend to get 'filtered' by nature to become gaussian. If you drop 1000 steel balls through a branching pin cascade (like you get in physics classes) then the distribution at the bottom will be gaussian. The reason beta pulses are perceived as gaussian is because a few orbits drop early, a few orbits drop late but most drop somewhere at the avg time, the whole distribution, just like the pin cascade is gaussian. I think you're right, dimples in spacetime would be gaussian too.

I haven't observed any 20ms delayed gaussians yet in my test fires but I Iwon't give up just yet! :)

waterfireho

Quote from: Yucca on May 22, 2008, 12:49:10 PM

The question is by Juans calculations what volume of carbon must sit inside each toroid to give 6KW per toroid output and could that carbon fit betwix the pop rivet and the toroid wall?


They should be 6mm X 60mm or roughly 1/4" x 2 3/8"


aleks

Quote from: Yucca on May 22, 2008, 01:10:20 PMThe reason beta pulses are perceived as gaussian is because a few orbits drop early, a few orbits drop late but most drop somewhere at the avg time, the whole distribution, just like the pin cascade is gaussian. I think you're right, dimples in spacetime would be gaussian too.
You do not get me fully. It is a gaussian curve in logarithmic time scale. It's very different to energy spectrum - we have a lot of gaussian curves there, of course. It's logarithmic time scale! I can't justify it being log scale, because it means some betas accelerated earier, some accelerated later, in log time base. If it was an exp rise with exp decay it would be a different story, but it's clearly a smooth gaussian curve. Can anybody help maybe?

aleks

Quote from: waterfireho on May 22, 2008, 01:12:17 PM
They should be 6mm X 60mm or roughly 1/4" x 2 3/8"
Sounds like battery carbon rods? :)

Feynman

@Yucca
Nice analysis of the 60kw setup. Too bad about the graphite.

@allcanadian
Try doubling or tripling that voltage and use the formulas that Dave posted to calculate capacitance.