Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[aleks]

Your description of the torroid creating a magnetic monopole is most interesting.

Well, it's carbon rod discharge what creates a pack of magnetic monopoles. Toroid is only subject to influence of the varying magnetic field created by emerging magnetic monopoles. This was a hypothesis I'm persuading from the very start: at first I thought that TPU arrangement is OK for this purpose, but now after studying carbon rod discharge I think it's even better.

[Issa]

Guys,

A description from the experiment made in 197x by belgian scientist Hoker states that this generator functions like a 'regular' transformer with 2 parts:

1) primary circuit with the carbon rod enclosed in a glass tube
2) secondary circuit features just a galvanometer to measure the current generated
3) transformer gives output = 4 x input only when a coil is applied on the glass tube

From the description, it seems that AC should be found on the secondary circuit

The circuit looks like this

What I do not understand is beta+ and beta- are released. Aren't they cancelling each other ?

[sparks]

Well, it's carbon rod discharge what creates a pack of magnetic monopoles. Toroid is only subject to influence of the varying magnetic field created by emerging magnetic monopoles. This was a hypothesis I'm persuading from the very start: at first I thought that TPU arrangement is OK for this purpose, but now after studying carbon rod discharge I think it's even better.

   This kid knows his shit.  Couple of gramma errors in this post otherwise it's a perfect explanation for what's going on in them there torroids.  Don't go getting all proud on me alecks just keep up the good work please.

[Koen1]

Well, if the output is 4 times the input there's nothing "regular" about this "transformer".

And about the + and - beta; + beta is "beta capture", in other words it absorbs an electron,
- beta is "beta emission", in other words it emits beta.
In theory, if we are causing the carbon to emit beta without it actually being beta-emitting C14,
it should be possible to make a carbon atom emit a beta particle (electron) and thus become
very positively charged for a very brief period, during which it can capture a different free electron
(beta capture) and end up as a "neutral" atom again. For this charge exchange to be usable as
energy source, we would "only" need to make sure the beta is emitted forcibly enough to gain more
distance to said atom than the 'free' electron that gets captured.
If the beta does not distance itself far enough from such beta-capturing atoms, the emitted beta
should indeed be re-captured by the same or one of the other 'positive' atoms, and no output should
be present in the form of beta emissions.

What I have some trouble with is the glass tube... Beta should not penetrate a glass wall, really...
That's entirely why they use glass containers for natural beta-emitter light sources (tritium glow sticks):
they are safe because the beta does not penetrate the glass. Or at least, that's what is claimed by
just about every producer of beta-emitter glow products...
So if beta truly cannot penetrate the glass in amounts sufficient to provide such energy, then it
seems totally impossible for that setup to produce any output, let alone 4 times the input.
And in that light the EMI interpretation seems to gain more plausibility.

Unfortunately there is now so much contradicting info about there being beta or not and about
that even being possible or not that I am still a bit confused...

[Koen1]

   This kid knows his shit.  Couple of gramma errors in this post otherwise it's a perfect explanation for what's going on in them there torroids. 

Really? Beg explain how a magnetic monopole exists?
Seems slightly contradictory to the entire concept of magnetism being spin... doesn't it?

If we're throwing in hypothetical particles, why not assume it is photons in the Octarine frequency band
that magick the output into existence?