Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

Started by Tesla_2006, July 31, 2006, 08:15:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

hartiberlin

Walter Hofman informed me via email, cause he could not post
over here, that he once tried with his saltwater batteries
made via Zamak Z28 plates and graphite plates to
charge them up via a 120 Volts to 12 Volts transformer and a graetz bridge
only pulsing this way 120 Hz DC 12 Volts pulses from this setup
onto his batteries.

He said, at that time he did not know, what was going on
and his 2 DVMs went crazy and blew up and a Geiger counter
CD V 700 modell 5 also went full peak at 5 Meters away.

So I guess he had the same effect.

So just using rectified 12 Volts pulses from the grid will also work
at least in these batteries.

His LEDs on these batteries latest then 8000 hours he wrote further.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

sparks

   Magnetic monopoles exist as a plasmic ring current.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

Issa

Then maybe the glass tube was super thin - or there are magnetic emissions captured/transmitted by the iron ring, transformed by the secondary circuit to produce current?

Indeed, there are too many diverging info at this moment.

Maybe we should start from scratch from Hoker device and gradually add hypothesis...

aleks

Quote from: Koen1 on May 23, 2008, 09:17:13 AM
Really? Beg explain how a magnetic monopole exists?
How gravity exists could you explain? If you look via my point of view you won't see difference between gravity and magnetic monopole. It's the same thing, just a different signum. Beside that as I've tried to show, magnetism does not have to be a special thing: magnetism can be a result of statistical interaction of electrostatic fields only. So, if we throw magnetism theory into a trash can, we are basically left with electrostatic fields only. If we assume that electrostatic fields are symmetric there should also positive electrostatic fields exist. In this case, gravity suits well to be a positive electrostatic field. There things unite and we are left with positive and negative electrostatic fields only in this whole universe. Now, can an interaction of two electrostatic fields emerge a third electrostatic field? I'm sure it can, and it is what happens during particle collisions, impacts, explosions, implosions and bremsstrahlung. But this "third" electrostatic field is short-living. Now imagine what should be done to make it long-living: you have to "close the loop" so that two existing electrostatic fields interact continously and produce a third electrostatic field continously.

"Third" electrostatic field can be seen as a non-linear summation of two electrostatic fields coming to a very close contact. So, as a result the summary field is larger than a simple sum of two electrostatic fields. This is what manifests itself as Casimir force in my opinion. Of course, it has a different signum than signum of electrostatic fields that come into contact.

I know it's all freevolous thinking, but I'm not an academician nor scientist - so I can think whatever I want without subjecting anybody to loss of grants due to bulltalk. ;)

aleks

Quote from: sparks on May 23, 2008, 09:10:26 AM
   This kid knows his shit.  Couple of gramma errors in this post
I'm much better at writing in Russian.