UFO politics Keeps his word 12-12 12 Let the games begin.......

[tinman]

Here is version 2 of the video ,that has clearer word's.
I have forgoten to include the screen shot,but that can be seen in the last video.
You can also take your own screen shot at any time-the results will be the same if useing UFO's measurement method's-we will get an overunity result.
The correct measurement method will always show an efficiency very close to the manufactures specs for this motor.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkwRA28Y0dM
Tomorow i will do the test again on an AC motor,useing a watt meter.
This will eliminate any error in volt and amp to watt conversions.
I might aswell after spending the cash on this setup lol.

[poynt99]

tinman,

Per your video, are you certain the pulley diameter is 7.17 inches?

I believe you said the pulley diameter is 58mm, which is 2.28 inches. This yields a circumference of 7.16 inches.

[TinselKoala]

@.99: thanks for the explanation... I see your point now. Has anyone voiced this objection to Lewin?

@Tinman: Good job, as usual... thanks for spending the time and money to do this. Who could have imagined that all these motors (and cheap induction cookers!) could all be so "clearly" overunity in performance.

I'm looking forward to seeing your schematic for the cap/LED/diode board testing. The schematic for the little function generator would also be very helpful in case the specifics of that circuit might be important for the effect. (I don't see how or why, but just in case a standard FG can't reproduce the effect, it would be nice to know the circuit of your oscillator.)

I've done a little bit of searching for your oscilloscope... a single channel scope is kind of unusual these days..... It looks like it has the same kinds of knobs on it as my Topward power supply, so I thought it might be a Topward, but Topward's current lines of scopes are different, so I'm still in the dark about your scope.

[poynt99]

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/test-pm.htm

[poynt99]

@.99: thanks for the explanation... I see your point now. Has anyone voiced this objection to Lewin?

I've not seen nor heard of any objections. I doubt very much there are any.

His lecture is very convincing, but unfortunately amounts to an unintentional deception.