OU from orbital physics, and some spooky stuff

[schuler]

I had to share:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHlAJ7vySC8

[e2matrix]

I had to share:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHlAJ7vySC8

I've seen that one before - cool demo for anyone who has not played with gyroscopes.    I just found some info recently that may come into play regarding all this.   It is evidence that Newtons F=MA is WRONG.   Considering so many other laws and theories are based on that it is quite interesting to note.   Some one said Newton originally had a correct equation but that it got changed by someone (or even possibly by Newton due to some politics at the time).   The F=MA or Force = Mass times Acceleration does not in the real world show inertial weight is present in an inertial acceleration. So why isn't the inertial weight represented in the equation? The concept of Mass seems to be taking the place of inertial weight.   For an interesting paper titled "F = ma, Important Equation, Big Mistake" on this situation read the attached PDF. 

[schuler]

Thank you e2matrix.

Another interesting video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpCEJxO6V9g

[schuler]

Found in another post:

Scientists from the Jagellonian University and Opole University have
observed that multiple rotation of a simple turbine showed that the
more times you turned it, the longer it rotated on its own later,
although, theoretically, it should not. They published the results of
their research in "Journal of Technical Physics".

http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.physics/2006-04/msg00164.html

[sparks]

Found in another post:http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.physics/2006-04/msg00164.html

Are they saying that the gyro is brought to rest and then spun up again using the same amount of input.  Then a brake is applied and that the gyro appears to generate more energy than used to spin it up?  This excess energy accumulates from previous spinups and braking cycles? For some reason the words inertial frame dragging come to mind.