Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[barbosi]

And all acting principle behind this is simple??!!??!!
Personally, I don't see anything simple here. Simple is when you look at it and see it. Nothing more.
I know, "take it easy", "relax", "deep breath", nothing works. I relaxed, I collapsed, I got an easy book, I got a nap, I got drunk, I got asleep again, etc, but I didn't get it.
I guess I'm going to have a time out and occasionally to read what others find and judge by the only measure of "simplicity". Not simple, cannot be true...

Best of luck people!

[orosado]

Hello everyone,

In the middle of the following page, I found the next quote:
http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/energy21/adamsmotor.htm

Q: Does this device have any similarity to Nikola Tesla's U.S. patent 568,176 that Bill has recently highlighted as a possible radiant energy device?

Maybe. This is something I have attempted to investigate recently. The Tesla unit relies on self oscillation within the core, as each pulse is delivered when the magnetic polarity in the core has only partially decayed from that established by the previous pulse. You therefore get a form of flux movement and 'free precharge,' to the main circuit. Hints of cold current are contained in the patent which talks of 'converting and supplying electrical energy in a form suited to the production of certain novel electrical phenomena' and more importantly 'around the break or point of interruption I place a condenser or condensers to store the energy of the discharge current, ' and a 'high electromotive force which is induced at each break of the main circuit furnishes the proper current for charging the condenser, which may therefore be small and inexpensive.' This is in line with the observed properties of the POD technology, which is also able to store large amounts of charge in capacitors much more quickly and reliably than conventional science teaches is possible. My current gut feeling is that Tesla's setup is basically the same thing, just much harder to tune. But since the Tesla patent hints that it may be possible to completely eliminate the magnets from the POD layout further decreasing costs, it is worth keeping in mind.

Then almost near the end of that same page, I found this quote:

And finally, Bill has recently published a most fascinating analysis, that suggest that Nikola Tesla's U.S. patent 568,176, is in a fact a cold current generation device. I have decided to omit it for space reasons, but this document contains sufficient insight into the physics of negative energy generation, for anyone with talent to properly interpret the schematics.

On that same page, regarding the Tesla Transformer, not to be confused with the Tesla Coil, the following was is quoted:

Tesla Transformers are not magnetoelectric devices, they use radiant shockwaves, and produce pure voltage without current. No university High Frequency Coil must ever be called a "Tesla Coil", since the devices usually employed in demonstration halls are the direct result of apparatus perfected by Sir Oliver Lodge and not by Nikola Tesla. The Tesla Transformer is an impulse apparatus, and cannot be as easily constructed except by strict conformity with parameters which Tesla enunciated. Tesla Transformers produce extraordinary white impulse discharges of extreme length and pressure, which exceed the alternating violet spark displays of Lodge Coils. This is illustrated by noting the manner in which Tesla Transformers are actually constructed. While looking and seeming the same, each system actually performs very different functions. Lodge Coils are alternators. Tesla Transformers are unidirectional impulses. The most efficient Tesla Transformations were obtained only when the disruptive radiating wire line equaled the mass of the helical coil.

Regards,
Omar

[brnbrade]

Erfinder

Oh, yes.!

Chickens make eggs and eggs make more chickens.! 

Who did appear first ? 

The magnetism or Electricity? Here is the controversy hahaha. 

Erfinder boy badly. 

Please answer. 

[orosado]

I find myself laughing a lot lately.....I said that this is simple when you understand the fundamentals.  This was not an exaggeration.  The truth is here, some of you are beginning to see it.

Hello Erfinder,

I am glad the referenced quotes made you laugh! I knew they would spark some debate regarding the accuracy of the assertions. Even so, I felt there was a bit of truth behind them. Thankfully, it was you who replied!

Regards,
Omar

[brnbrade]

Hello all!!!


How is it that a magnetic field can be transformed in a field of high (electrostatic) potential in a transformer without himself to be electrostatic?

Being like this, I can affirm that: a transformer magnetic Iron works equal as a not magnetic iron.
Is the difference, is one transformed by the origin strength and other it already possesses his origin even?
ERFinder that would like that he answered me, please.!

How does a magnetic flow line produce electricity?

Doesn't produce anything. They are work in way the if they alternate in the streams A.C., and they are direct + and - polarized in D.C.
Magnetism and electricity are same thing. Or I am wrong.

What is the nature of the flow line?

AC. Pulsed Alternate etc... or A.D. static or polarized

So that to produce or to induce electric effects this should also be electric!

That made to remember of the pyramids of Egypt, with their sides of the faces gone back to the magnetic north pole of the earth.
They seem to be capturing a field that comes of there. I know, that is mysticism, more he reminded me something big.

Regards