Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[SeaMonkey]

My interest in the concept is to
isolate any phenomena which
demonstrate beneficial cababilities.

The circuit in question is neither complicated
nor is it complex;  at least, not from the
standpoint of what it is intended to achieve.

I have no interest in either correcting or
educating Rosemary.  She is a very clever
and intelligent woman who will, when she
decides the time is right, pursue those actions
on her own.

Presently it seems that Rosemary is engaged in
a psychological operation to counteract efforts
to "take her down."  She has proven to be a very
skillful adversary in this drama.  When the conflict
is evaluated in terms of stimulus/response one can
only conclude that hers is the superior strategy.

When one enters a psychological fray with a woman
one must accept that the "rules" will be very flexible
and that the "goalposts" may be moved as necessary.

Women are exceedingly good at getting men to obsess
over them.  If the men fall into the trap, that is...

That being said, it is hoped that you'll live happily
ever after!

[TinselKoala]

My interest in the concept is to
isolate any phenomena which
demonstrate beneficial cababilities.

The circuit in question is neither complicated
nor is it complex;  at least, not from the
standpoint of what it is intended to achieve.

I have no interest in either correcting or
educating Rosemary.  She is a very clever
and intelligent woman who will, when she
decides the time is right, pursue those actions
on her own.

Why are you bothering to comment here, then? You DO have an interest in "educating or correcting" me? PicoWatt? .99?
I am afraid you are going to have to establish some credentials if you intend to teach me something. And I don't believe that you have been able to show that I am wrong about anything, so how do you intend to correct me?

Presently it seems that Rosemary is engaged in
a psychological operation to counteract efforts
to "take her down."  She has proven to be a very
skillful adversary in this drama.

She is persistent, nothing more. Her "skill" consists in standing outside the arena, shouting "I can do that".... but of course she cannot. She cannot and has not ever provided proof for any of her claims.
(And what she is engaging in is called "STALLING" and "SNIVELLING". It is not a psychological operation, it is the neurotic meandering of a person who knows she hasn't got proof of her claims.)

When the conflict
is evaluated in terms of stimulus/response one can
only conclude that hers is the superior strategy.

I laugh at you. The superior strategy would be to PROVE ONE'S CLAIMS, instead of insulting one's critics with false accusations, mendacious misrepresentations and continuing empty bloviation.

When one enters a psychological fray with a woman
one must accept that the "rules" will be very flexible
and that the "goalposts" may be moved as necessary.

Women are exceedingly good at getting men to obsess
over them.  If the men fall into the trap, that is...

That being said, it is hoped that you'll live happily
ever after!

This matter has nothing to do with Ainslie's gender or her age, no matter how much she... and you.... try to make it so. She wants to play Science.... then here it is, in all its glory. "It doesn't matter how smart you are or how beautiful your theory is... .if it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong." And Ainslie's "theory" is not only not beautiful or smart, it doesn't agree with experiment, therefore it is wrong, and her own experimental data demonstrate this nicely.
Nobody has moved any goalposts, either. (Except of course Ainslie's mendacious editing of her manuscripts and forum posts to remove incriminating statements and bogus calculations.) The goalposts are still firmly in the ground: Ainslie has made claims, and she must support them with experiments and demonstrations, or she must retract them and issue errata and apologies. It is as simple as that and nothing about that has changed in thirteen years of Ains-lies.

[SeaMonkey]

And just what are your abilities? Got any YouTube demonstrations of your abilities? Anything you've built yourself to show off? Why should anyone believe your purely qualitative hand-waving analysis, without some sample of your actual work to go by?

YouTube has proven to be quite the
phenom.  There is much available there
which has educational merit.

I'd put the bulk of what you've offered
in this category.

Sadly, most of the "technical" product
put up by many of the aspiring technicians
leaves much to be desired.  But, it does
represent a beginning and one can only
hope that their education and abilities will
progress as they continue their quests.

No, I'm Old School.  In fact, I may be nothing
more than a figment of your imagination.

I mean;  C'mon!  What is a SeaMonkey anyway?

[TinselKoala]

A sea monkey is something one used to find advertised in the back of pulp SF magazines. They are brine shrimp. You send off for them, and wait in eager anticipation for them to arrive in the mail. You put them in water and they wriggle around for a while and then they die. And you are ever afterwards wary of things you find advertised in the back of pulp magazines.

[profitis]

@tk ok ok.hey at least we can agree on one thing here without the need for me or you to run and fetch model demos and that is: any  overunity circuit must challenge the 2nd law thermodynamics right?and its gotta happen in the core right?these two statements are at least what we do know without needing to run for backup.let these 2 facts guide the energyseekeryouths of the future then.now back to channel ainslie..