Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

Keep it up, Ainslie.... you are doing fine.

Perhaps you'd like to show your calculation yourself, demonstrating the "delta time" you think I left out.

No... how silly of me, you NEVER HAVE and NEVER WILL support your claims with your own demonstrations, especially if they involve actual mathematics or even simple arithmetic like an average power calculation. Unlike you, I SHOW MY WORKINGS.


Don't forget, though.... I will send these little messages of yours to everyone you contact in your attempt to gain publicity, so they can see just who you really are.

[SeaMonkey]

Why are you bothering to comment here, then? You DO have an interest in "educating or correcting" me? PicoWatt? .99?
I am afraid you are going to have to establish some credentials if you intend to teach me something. And I don't believe that you have been able to show that I am wrong about anything, so how do you intend to correct me?

Nope. No intent or desire to educate,
correct or teach anything.  Simply to
provide a little feedback which may be
done with as you desire.  No obligation
of any sort is implied.

Technically you're on solid ground and
have made very few errors much to your
credit; and you've graciously made correction
to resolve any misunderstandings.  On
technical issues that is.

Regarding your efforts to stimulate some
sort of "behavior modification" on the part
of Rosemary, it could be argued that your
tactics have been, shall we say, ineffective?

Women do not respond well to displays of
weakness;  what they crave is men with
strength.  Who uplift with tenderness.

The drama has been both amusing and
edifying.  Something good may come of it
yet!

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie repeatedly accuses me of "cowardice" because I protect my real identity. Yet she won't reveal the names of these "Academics" of "hers"! And she has threatened me several times and has attempted to contact potential employers to try to find out who I am and also to try to denigrate me and my abilities. And the world is full of stalkers and trolls; at least one person who used to post here and who actually DID have an address for me actually threatened to show up on my doorstep.

Yet, in spite of this, I have offered to reveal my identity to responsible persons under strict NDA with penalty clause. And several people on this forum know exactly who I am and where I live. There is a difference between "cowardice" and "caution". Ainslie has shown over and over that she has no regard for truth or actual facts.... and every time she refers to me as "Bryan Little" she demonstrates this again.

She never DID drop out of school? Then she can show us her degree or diploma. Can't she? SURELY?
Applying her own "reasoning", if she doesn't show her diploma she is admitting... nay, CONFESSING..... that she did in fact drop out and not complete her course of study. Or perhaps she simply flunked out.

[TinselKoala]

Nope. No intent or desire to educate,
correct or teach anything.  Simply to
provide a little feedback which may be
done with as you desire.  No obligation
of any sort is implied.

Technically you're on solid ground and
have made very few errors much to your
credit; and you've graciously made correction
to resolve any misunderstandings.  On
technical issues that is.

And I would be happy to correct any other technical errors that you might be able to demonstrate in my work. Just let me know. In all fairness, though..... you should do the same for Ainslie, don't you think?

Regarding your efforts to stimulate some
sort of "behavior modification" on the part
of Rosemary, it could be argued that your
tactics have been, shall we say, ineffective?

Women do not respond well to displays of
weakness;  what they crave is men with
strength.  Who uplift with tenderness.

The drama has been both amusing and
edifying.  Something good may come of it
yet!

I would be acting exactly the same if I had no idea of Ainslie's gender. She chooses to reveal herself more than most people do on the internet; that is her choice and she may accept the consequences willingly. I do not care what Ainslie may or may not crave, nor why. She could be a pimply teenage male with a computer and an oscilloscope, or a venerable old Professor Emeritus at MIT or CPUT, I do not care in the least. Nor will I "cut her slack" because she claims to be old, infirm, stupid, and blind. If she makes a claim that she cannot support with facts and data, and insults me and a whole community of people while she is doing it..... I don't give a flying mosfet who or what she is, I will demand the same degree of proof, and I will react in the same manner to her continuing insults and disrespect, with demonstrations of her own stupidity, mendacity and willfull ignorance, in her own words and data.

[powercat]

@SeaMonkey
It is very suspicious that post 5 from the time you joined this site indicates that you know Rosemary, it is also obvious you are a blind believer in her work, we can now see yet again you're efforts at trying to make this out to be an attack on women, is completely without merit. http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg315496/#msg315496
You sound so much like Rosemary, all you seem to do is try and divert people away from the real issue that Rosemary's circuit does not work as she claims.