Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

Now that Ainslie has shown that she cannot obtain the Figure 3 scopeshot as claimed in the paper, unless she moves the probe or has a failed mosfet in place, let's go ahead and look at the Figure 6 and Figure 7 claims.

The text of the paper says that these settings allowed her to raise the temperature of the water to 104 degrees C, "bringing to boil", and producing steam at all temperatures over 62 degrees C.

And I say these claims are specious.

She cannot produce water at 104 degrees C in an unpressurised container at the elevation of Cape Town (near sea level).
Steam is water vapor at over 100 degrees C and is invisible. Whatever she saw it was not steam.
Zero current in the Q1 mosfet will not result in this large heating. A tiny current, as is perhaps shown in Figure 6, could easily be accounted for by the improper probe position and the slight resistances of her crimped and cliplead connectors. The conclusion is that the mosfet is conducting but the trace is under-indicating the true current because of the malpositioned probe, OR that the mosfet is blown and the reported heat is residual, from just before the mosfet blew.
Contrary to what Weir says in the video, the Gate signal for Figure 6 is only about 8.5 volts, according to my calipers.

Further, she claims to do this heating without measurable depletion of the battery source.... yet her own evidence shows otherwise. Examination of the scopeshots in chronological sequence shows a steady decline in battery voltage over her whole series of testing. The batteries DO discharge measurably and it is her own fault for not knowing, and ignoring, the proper way to measure this discharge.

[TinselKoala]

The last fall back position, as you heard in the demonstration, was for her to claim that the batteries exceeded their maximum discharge potential, or that the load dissipated far more power than the batteries could have contained, or that they "exceeded their Watt-hour rating".
This too is a specious claim..... if only because she has never actually tested this!

But further, the  _only_  source of this claim is her "25 megaJoules in one this test alone" calculation. There is no other support for this claim of batteries exceeding their ratings.... anywhere in the Ainslie data or anecdotes, except the Quantum report from thirteen years ago. And we have seen how that dataset was produced and the math that went into that claim. This calculation as presented in the forum post, you will note, is the experiment described in the paper and was produced according to her at the time by the Figure 3and 6 and 7 waveforms, but another shot that did not make it into the paper also shows the Figure 3 "anomalous" feature.

[MileHigh]

Just another comment for what it's worth.  I didn't get the sense that the gentleman that started the demo, the person ostensibly on Rosemary's "team," was really familiar with what was going on or was in control of the setup.  He seemed to be very tentative and unsure.  I wasn't following closely and only listened to five minute stretches here and there but that was my impression.  So that didn't help with the overall vibe at all.

Even so, you gents picked out the cherries from the morass and got the verification that you were looking for about the infamous Figure 3 issue.

From a bird's eye view, this is just more of the "Bizarro Universe" aspect that we often see in the ongoing drama in the realm of free energy.  This was all a "big battle" over whether or not an N-channel MOSFET should switch on if the gate-to-source voltage goes high.  In reality, by definition there is no debate.  It's like you can imagine a two-hour film covering the last five years worth of the ups and downs in the realm of free energy where it's just an endless chain of two-minute "docudramas" strung together one after the other.  Mylow, South African trip, Rosie drama, RomeroUK, Ferris Wheel, giant Brazilian bread slicer, Inteligentry, 2H2 + O2 guys blowing themselves up, Tesla obsession, Imhotep one-hit-wonder, Wayne's brain, the list goes on and on.  Now that would be an eye-opener.  Let's start a crowd funding project!!!!

[TinselKoala]

So what happened to the "post-game show"? The discussion was just starting to get interesting, down to the meat of the matter, when it was cut off, literally in mid sentence.

[markdansie]

I am not sure what happened as I was in the end watching the you-tube feed. I got cut of at 4 hours just as it got real interesting with Mr Weir was starting to make some good points and obviously was trying to get to the bottom of the claim.
It was a shame he was not there from hour 1 and directing operations.
I am going to suggest that they do another demonstration with a real camera and Mr Weir directing them. But with a 1 hour time limit.
Mark