Bedini, Lindemann, Bearden, Dollard -- What are their Accomplishments?

[Qwert]

Ein~+ein, baroutologos, your opinions match my findings.

[baroutologos]

That doesn't seem likely given the direction Tesla's interest took him.  Unless you're a 'suppressionist' believing Tesla's lab was destroyed to threaten him against further OU research, you'll need to ask yourself why he abandoned OU devices (generation) in favour of wireless electrical transmission.  Is there any evidence he even tried to promote such devices for rural or remote areas. 

As for the possibility of OU, if (dark) energy and matter can indeed come from nothing, as argued by physicist Lawrence M. Krauss in his recently published A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing, then isn't OU at least a theoretical possibility?

IMHO, OU is more than a theoretical possibility. According my view is a matter of time.


Possibilities already discussed.

- nano diodes. Turning the random microscopic movement of electrons into consisten current flow
- magnetic transistor. Discovering a material that would act as a semiconductor to magnetic flow.

and mild nuclear energy as
- cold fusion (hydrogen etc)
- stimulated beta decay

and so on and so forth. Of course those in order to be made will be needed (IMO) more than a backyard lab. And if already made, will not be allowed unless establishment sees it fit.
I personally am 99% sure that in the near or distant future, people will have their energy needs fulfilled by other sources than those present today.

[Ein~+ein]

Thanks for your comments, everyone.    

Given my experience with energeticforum.com's selective intolerance for skeptical enquiry, I didn't expect this thread to survive given the fact this website also receives funding from Lindemann (see ad on left). 

@Peter Lindemann, John Bedini, Eric Dollard, or your followers: I'm curious whether you'd agree with conference promoter Aaron Murakami's assertion that yours is a DIFFERENT science, one providing SOLUTIONS that 'mainstream science' hasn't.  I'd also like to know if such conferences actually sell such 'solutions' (devices) rather than just the 'science' behind them as it doesn't seem audiences have either the technical aptitude nor even the interest, strange as it may seem.  I mean, if you really want to provide solutions, and promote yourselves at the same time, why not additionally sell devices to those who aren't DIYers? 

[profitis]

@bartogoulos..true.most of those examples are 2nd 'law' violations.an inductor core may act as a heat sink for ambient heat under right circumstances.creating adequate circuitry to tap this takes a lot of trial and error but less effort would be required by those who understand how this happens.

[MileHigh]

Einstein:

Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction.  A few thoughts relating to this thread's theme.  About four years ago Aaron made some video clips in his attempt to replicate Rosemary Ainslie's circuit.  Even though he had been "talking tech" and rubbing shoulders with Bedini and supposedly doing bench work for 10 years, his bench skills were almost nil and he was often completely lost.  He couldn't understand that there is no voltage drop across an ideal inductor with DC current going through it.  A couple of years ago at a conference Aaron's buddy Bedini demonstrates a giant "windmill" "motor."  What did it actually do, what was it's practical purpose?  Only The Shadow knows.  Bedini claimed that it had to be aligned with the Earth's magnetic field.... right.   Peter Lindemann at a recent conference said that he was going to reveal the secret tech behind a Nazi WWII motor/generator that was a "proven" free energy device.  The net result of the thread on EF is that Peter was only talking about a device that collects the back spike.  Like wow man, that's really new and exciting.

Probably the most striking thing for me at these Bedini-themed conferences, is that they never explain to their audience how the main drive coil in a Bedini motor works.  You think that they would have a high-profile workshop called "understanding the dynamics of the main coil" or something like that.  They don't do this because they need to perpetuate the myth about the coil and the "radiant energy" that it outputs and the tantalizing tease that says perhaps some of the "radiant energy" comes in from the environment.   So, almost nobody that attends these Bedini-themed conferences truly understands how a coil works, the majority of the coordinators that work the conference don't understand how a coil works, and the attendees end up leaving the conference still ignorant about how the main drive coil works.  It's a barrel of monkeys for sure.

MileHigh