New Tech

lancaIV · September 06, 2019, 11:53:54 AM

Average wind-electric conversion per square meter land area ( not rotor sqm ):
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.deutschlandfunknova.de%2Fnachrichten%2Fwindkraft-wind-schafft-h%25C3%25B6chstens-einen-watt-pro-quadratmeter

ONE WATT PER SQUAREMETER
periodical

ALTERNATIVE. ?
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8847720B2/en
1 sqm : 16 X Goldbaum generator a 100 Hz cycling ~ 15 KWh x 16 generators = 240 KWh or

TWO HUNDRED AND FOURTY THOUSAND WATT PER SQUAREMETER ( per stage)

permanent

Goldbaum generator similar :
Adolf Zielinski ambient energy converter ( in the 80' a hint, 2019 anymore : RT superconducting coil production)

This will become the future air CO2 capture and CO2 to C( Carbon as powder: air Graphit to graphene ) and O2 dissoziation electricity source. !

Not natural free solar and/or Wind forces but artificial Synthese, "Nature mimikry" !

Thermobaric reactors. !
Review :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.deutschlandfunknova.de%2Fnachrichten%2Fwindkraft-wind-schafft-h%25C3%25B6chstens-einen-watt-pro-quadratmeter
350 GW : Germany ~ 350000 sqkm x 1000000 sqm/sqkm x 1 Wp/sqm = 350 GW

new calculation : static Goldbaum generator use,portable,low noise

350000 sqkm x 1000000 sqm/sqkm x 240000 Wp/sqm = 350 GW x 240000

Germany : up to 84000000 GW per hour and stage

Anymore off-shore and on-shore windtowers ( infrasonic noise !) ; no local-foreign distribution net-work

Answer to rhetoric question :
https://www.spiegel.de/plus/wie-die-energiewende-die-grundstueckspreise-in-die-hoehe-treibt-a-ec045fa8-7ac8-43a7-9c62-38d18d8e614b

lancaIV · September 06, 2019, 03:58:25 PM

Quote from: lancaIV on September 03, 2019, 05:04:29 AM
Step by step conversion economy

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fedison.handelsblatt.com%2Ferklaeren%2Fvergleichsrechnung-so-viel-co2-sparen-e-autos-gegenueber-verbrennern%2F22654278.html%3Freadon%3Dy

30 tons CO2/200000 Km Diesel /gasoil IC-engine car

14,3 ton CO2/200000 Km electric car with average electricity-mix

1,42 ton CO2/200000 Km electric car with "green electricity"

https://www.expanderenergy.com/synfuel-at-expander-energy/

synthetic Diesel 53,53.g CO2e/M petroleum based Diesel 93,3 g CO2e/M

30 ton CO2 x (53,53/93,3) ~ 17,21 ton CO2/200000 Km + exhaust emission filter
and each conventional Diesel is as same clean - CO2 related -like an electric car with conventional electricity mix

Syn-Diesel/gasoil IC-engine 17,21 ton CO2/2000000 Km - 30% Stupak fuel saver : 12,05 ton CO2/2000000 Km

--------------------------------------

Granstroi Arakelian fuel process : ? g CO2e/M
Granstroi- similar approach :

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/fuel_sunlight_co2_water_alternative_jet_fuel_469na1_en.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjdzbr9-LzkAhUYAWMBHWwbDiM4FBAWMAN6BAgIEAE&usg=AOvVaw3kVawJfPC-Rww-oXcHdCDh
Syngas/fuel versus conventional jet-fuel : - 80% CO2/Lt. emission

------------------------------------------------

Electricity for fuel : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-neutral_fuel
"Renewable and nuclear energy costs"The prices for free -surplus-electricity is sharp falling, partial the producer has to pay for electricity delivering !
One solution process "wind - or sun- fuel" http://www.dotyenergy.com/
Fossil/nuclear electricity/green electricity :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.handelsblatt.com%2Funternehmen%2Fenergie%2Ferneuerbare-energien-oekostrom-anteil-steigt-im-ersten-halbjahr-2019-auf-rekordhoch%2F24494328.html%3Fticket%3DST-15801534-1vfDJfsSox4UIFTjshJb-ap6

When we give an annual 12500 Km electric car use by 10 KWh/100 Km consume we get 1250 KWh electricity production/generation need per year per car.

For Germany :
30 Millions electric cars x 1250 KWh = 37500 Mio. KWh electricity production per year ~ 2/3 actual "green-e"

Low-e drive car
When we give an annual 12500 Km electric car use by 2 KWh/100 Km consume we get 250 KWh electricityproduction/generation need per year per car.
For Germany :
30 Millions electric cars x 250 KWh = 7 500 Mio. KWh electricity production per year ~ 1/7 actual " green-e"

For the World :
Street legal velocity max. 130/120 Km/h on high ways, common 80/50/40/30/10 Km/h city drive

Germany : average car velocity included "stop&go": 56 Km/h ( source: ADAC)

Appropriate Technology :

When we equip the low-e drive with power saving electric motors and " in situ=in e-car power plant" we do not need neither on-/off-shore wind or-solar farming nor distribution net-grid : off-grid economy

Low-e drive 2 KWh/100 - 75% average e- power saving electric motor : 0,5 KWh/100 Km =
small insitu e-plant need
There is not a physical barrier, not a technical barrier : only " habit change" = huge problem

ccw/cw - view, before/after- view

Autark/autonomous living Technology on 4-wheels :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.n-tv.de%2Fauto%2FEin-kleines-Haus-auf-Raedern-article21246422.html
"mobile glamping"

lancaIV · September 08, 2019, 08:16:44 AM

Comparison :
18 sqm solar panel on tect installed
Each solar panel with 15% efficiency = 200 Wp per sqm
1400 KWh solar energy per year/sqm locality

1400 KWh x 15% radiant energy to DC electricity x 18 sqm panel =3780 KWh electricity gain
18 sqm x 200 Wp x 3 US$ per Wp/ Installation costs : 10800 US$( included Inverter and other conventional equipment but without batteries/e-storage)

10800 US$ by 3780 KWh gain per year 20 years amortization and 5% capital tax :

28,57 US$cents per KWh

Calculating with 2 US$/Wp installation costs : 19 US$cents per KWh;

with 1 US$/Wp = 9,52 US$cents /KWh ;

with 0,5 US$/Wp = 4,76 US$cents/KWh

Dis-/Ad-vantage : periodically 0 Watt( winter,night)gain up to 3600 Wp gain(summer,day)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19900201&CC=DE&NR=3817730A1&KC=A1#
Given technical data : 70 Wattp solar 1 sqm panel and1 meter long 35 Watt Fluorescent lamp

5,25% radiant energy to DC conversion in the 80' conventional standart
Watt-lumen ratio of fluorescent lamps in the 80' ?
70 Watt - 35 Watt = 35 Watth per hour DC electricity surplus generation x 24 h = 840 Wh gain per day
35 Wh x 8766 h per year = 306,8 KWh DC electricity

Kilowatt- hour comparison "solar on tect" and. " inhouse solar" :
12 Koehler " light tubes" ~ 18 sqm solar 3600 Wp installation

Fluorescent lamp optimized in-/output Watt-lumen ratio
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=24&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19911001&CC=US&NR=5053933A&KC=A#
70 Wp solar panel with "new efficient lamp" 20 W (without controler) = 50 Wh per hour surplus DC electricity
x 24 hours = 1200 Wh per day / 50 Wh x 8766 = 438,3 KWh surplus DC electricity per year
KWh gain comparison : 18 sqm solar panel / improved Koehler " light tube: : 9

Instead one meter artificial " light tube" length we construct 2 meters tubes = 2 seriell lamps tubes
So we get per 2 meters lamp tube 876,6 KWh

KWh gain comparison : 5 x 2 meter tubes gives the 18 sqm on tect installation
One and 2 meter long tubes can stand vertical from basement to tect( room average high : 2,40 meter)

Constructing 3 meter/3 x 1 meter lamps and 4 meter/4 x 1 meter lamps also possible than f.e. vertical under room tect fixing

3 lamps tubes surplus DC electricity generation per year : 1314,9 KWh
4 lamps tubes surplus DC electricity generation per year : 1753,2 KWh

Attention : all the given numbers by 5,25% solar panel efficiency
and without lamp electric input controler

Paul Heinrich Marzahn with the Koehler tube invention output improvements :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Paul+marzahn&IN=&CPC=&IC=

5 x 70Wp cells gives by amplyfing average input : 650 Wp output less 12 x 13 W CFL input

~ 500 Wh surplus Dc electricity x 8766 = 4383 KWh

1 Marzahn "artificial 24/365 photoelectric chamber" gives as much energy as 18 sqm solar panel on tect installed
Commercial prize " price" for 18 sqm ontect installation : 10800 Euros ( 3 Euros/Wp)

Inhouse artificial 24/365 solar chamber ( green -electricity-house )

The costs for 1 Marzahn chamber with inverter : < 500 Euros by calculating with 0,5 Euro/Wp
chamber structure, mylar foil chamber wall as mirrors,12x lamps + holder, 5 x 70 Watt solar foils, inverter

Inhouse photoelectric conversation costs per KWh :
10 years calculation

active parts function warranty in hours :

lamps 30000 hours lifetime : 36 lamps for 10 years period : ea.1 meter lamp for 3,75 Euros

solar foil 15 years,by higher average Wattp 10 years

inverter 80000 hours lifetime

500 Euros( + 24 lamps) : +- 600 Euros x 5% capital tax annual and ten years period : 900 Euros investment
900 Euros divided by annual 8766 x 0,5 KWh = 4383 KWh and for the ten years period = 43830 KWh

means 2 Euro-cents per KWh generation costs. ! Actually !

Now to the " nearer reality" and calculatoric time/poweroutput/lifetime technical reality :
when "thick cells" works their nominal Wattp by natural light 900 full-hours per 8766 years and up to 30 years this represents 900h/8766 hours = 10,2 % per year power capacity output or

30 years-x 900 hours solar cells = 3 years 8766 full-hour solar cell

So we need for the 10 years calculation period and permanent work time 3 times 350 Wp solar foils

350 Wp x 0,5 Euros/Wp = 175 Euros x 2 = 350 Euros per Marzahn chamber investment more in the 4th and 7th year each 175 Euros !

First calculation base 600 Euros + 350 Euros for now physical correct base ( power x time )=
950 Euros by 5% capital tax and ten years period :

1425 Euros divided by 43830 KWh during this functional decade : 3,25 Euro-cents/KWh

With 0,4 Euros/Wp cell price : 565 Euros + 280 Euros x capital tax ~ 2,9 Euro-cents / KWh

With 0,3 Euros/Wp cell price : 530 Euros + 210 Euros x capital tax ~ 2,6 Euro-cents / KWh
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
When we get as clean energy investors 30% investment rebatte from the estate society this let us reach :
2,6 Euro-cents/KWh x 0,7 :

2 Euro-cents net costs for each generated KWh

Everywhere,day and night time and very cold or very hot ambient independent

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

With 0,2 Euros / Wp cell price : 495 Euros + 140 Euros x capital tax Euros ~ 2,2 Euro-cents / KWh

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=11&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19860304&CC=US&NR=4574161A&KC=A#
1984 1 US$ /sqm production costs x 2 = tandem cell and 1984 endconsumer 10 US$/ sqm ready to use to2019 endconsumer " open source condition" endprice with 15 US$/750 Wp ratio

With 0,02 Euros/Wp cell price : 432 Euros + 133 Euros( 19 x 1/2 year lifetime cells) x capital tax ~
2 Euro- cents/KWh

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With instead 5,25% with 10,5%, with 21% ,with 45% Oscar Fellows MEMS-TAR( AC-output),with56,25% Alvin Marks cell ?
then with power saving controler ?

With-/out investment rebatte. !?

Solar cell installation can - by several nations actual law- compensate up to 70% private household electricity consume !

For industrial electricity consume installations :

DC solar cell chamber output as

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20190207&CC=JP&NR=2019022271A&KC=A#
input :
1 sqm 1 cbm Mahrzahn chamber + Saburo couple : 650 Wp x Saburo C. O. P. 4 = 2600 Wp per hour
Up to 22791 KWh per year

1 sqm 2 cbm Mahrzahn chamber + Saburo couple : 1300 Wp x Saburo C. O. P 4 = 4600 Wp per hour
Up to 45583 KWh per year

1 sqm Marzahn/Saburo-couple ~ up to 4600 sqm windgenerator land use by 1 Wp/sqm windpower efficiency

1 sqm 2 cbm Mahrzahn chamber + Inverter + AC "magneto" couple :

https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11462
1300 Wp x 0,9 x C. O. P. 19 = 11700 W per hour

up to 102500 KWh per year

1 sqm Marzahn/"magneto" couple ~
up to 11700 sqm windgenerator Land use by 1 Wp/ sqm windpower efficiency

Bernd Koehler 5,25% cell C. O. P. : 70 W - 35 Watt lamp = C. O. P. 2

Mahrzahn 5,25 % cell C.O.P. ( without mirrors amplifying efficiency) 350 W - 156 Watt CFLs = C.O.P. 2,24

Mahrzahn 5,25 % cell C.O.P ( without mirrors amplyfying efficiency) 350 W - 100 Watt Imris lamps= C.O.P. 3,5

Menendez Baquero 10% cell : 1920 W - 500 Watt lamp = C.O.P. 3,84

Menendez Baquero with 5,25% cells and 500 Watt lamp = koehler tube efficiency and C. O. P. 2

Mahrzahn 5,25% cell C.O.P with mirrors amplifying efficiency 650 - 156 Watt CFLs = C.O.P. 4,16

Mahrzahn 5,25% cell C.O.P. with mirrors amplifying efficiency 650 W - 100 Watt Imris lamps = C.O.P. 6,5

Mahrzahn 10% cell C. O. P. with mirrors amplifying efficiency 1300 Watt - 100 Watt Imris lamps = C.O.P. 13

15% cell 2019 conventional commercial standart

20% cell 2022 conventional commercial standart

45% MEMS-TAR ( thermal-acoustic resonator with AC output)

56,25% Tandem cell

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If we assume that the Keppler Uni Linz 23000 Wp/Kg solar cels has 5,25 % constant efficiency and 15 years function lifetime this means that :

350 Wp Marzahn chamber cells / 23000 Wp Keppler-cells per Kg :

15 Grams solar cell material

represents

3600 Wp / ( 16 Wp/Kg) =

225 Kg on tect solar cell installation

15 grams versus 225000 grams

for min. 3780 KWh active conversion/ 4383 KWh

power to weight ratio
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 vertical Marzahn chamber with 1 sqm area and 2 cbm volume a 1300 Wp ~
1000 sqm Wind generator land area with 1 Wp/ sqm electricity generation

lancaIV · September 09, 2019, 07:11:46 AM

How to define technical terms. ?
1 Wp : by photoelectric conversion this is "1 sun radiation power" related
We can concentrate physical radiation !
Winston : up to 2000x suns concentration factor

Oscar Fellows MEMS-TAR :

1 sun radiation gain per sqm and by 45% conversion efficiency : 600 Wp/sqm ~ 0,06 Wp/sqcm

X x suns radiation gain per sqm and by 45% conversion efficiency : 100000 Wp/sqm ~ 10 Wp/sqcm

Per weigth and sqm optimizing efficiency factor : 45% ~ concentrated 7500%
1 Wp ~ concentrated 166 Wp

Natural sun 900 hours nominal full-time/power conversion from 8766 hours per year,artificial sun 8766 hours nominal full-time/power conversion from 8766 hours per year.

Which is the highest possible - known- Wp/sqcm conversion power ?
As "quantum well diod " thermionic cell array :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19941018&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

10 v 7 Wattp per sqm = 10000000 Wattp per sqm = 1000 Wp per square-centimeter

The MEMS-TAR concentrated output represents only 1% from the theoretical physical possible power maximum !
"quantum well diod" Wp/gram power-to-weight ratio ?

lancaIV · September 09, 2019, 07:54:01 AM

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5130608A/en
100 Watt output, 4000 pulses per second / 2 pulses per cycle = 2000 Hz = 2 KHz

https://patents.google.com/patent/US8847720B2/en
net output from 705 cbcm (~ 5,5 Kg) with 2 KHz cycling : 303 Kva/h

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=20&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20110518&CC=CN&NR=201836980U&KC=U#

energetic heater source : 100 Watt ( 100 VA) electric input

100 VA/303000 VA ~ ( 100/303000)x 5,5 Kg ~ 1,8 gram Harold Goldbaum generator weight