Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


New Tech

Started by lancaIV, July 12, 2013, 05:35:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

lancaIV

Step by step conversion economy


https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fedison.handelsblatt.com%2Ferklaeren%2Fvergleichsrechnung-so-viel-co2-sparen-e-autos-gegenueber-verbrennern%2F22654278.html%3Freadon%3Dy

30 tons CO2/200000 Km Diesel /gasoil IC-engine car

14,3 ton CO2/200000 Km electric car with average electricity-mix

1,42 ton CO2/200000 Km electric car with "green electricity"

https://www.expanderenergy.com/synfuel-at-expander-energy/
           
synthetic Diesel 53,53.g CO2e/M  petroleum based Diesel 93,3 g CO2e/M

30 ton CO2 x (53,53/93,3) ~ 17,21 ton CO2/200000 Km + exhaust emission filter
and each conventional Diesel is as same clean - CO2 related -like an electric car with conventional electricity mix

Syn-Diesel/gasoil IC-engine 17,21 ton CO2/2000000 Km - 30% Stupak fuel saver :  12,05 ton CO2/2000000 Km


Granstroi Arakelian fuel process : ? g CO2e/M

Electricity for fuel : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-neutral_fuel
"Renewable and nuclear energy costs"The prices for free -surplus-electricity is sharp falling, partial the producer has to pay for electricity delivering  !
One solution process "wind - or sun- fuel" http://www.dotyenergy.com/
Fossil/nuclear electricity/green electricity :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.handelsblatt.com%2Funternehmen%2Fenergie%2Ferneuerbare-energien-oekostrom-anteil-steigt-im-ersten-halbjahr-2019-auf-rekordhoch%2F24494328.html%3Fticket%3DST-15801534-1vfDJfsSox4UIFTjshJb-ap6

When we give an annual 12500 Km electric car use by 10 KWh/100 Km consume we get 1250 KWh electricity production/generation need per year per car.

                                                                          For Germany :
30 Millions electric cars x 1250 KWh = 37500 Mio. KWh electricity production per year ~ 2/3 actual "green-e"

                                                                     Low-e drive car
When we give an annual 12500 Km electric car use by 2 KWh/100 Km consume we get 250 KWh electricityproduction/generation need per year per car.
                                                                       For Germany :
30 Millions electric cars x 250 KWh = 7 500 Mio. KWh electricity production per year ~ 1/7 actual " green-e"


                                                                        For the World :
Street legal velocity max.  130/120 Km/h on high ways, common 80/50/40/30/10 Km/h city drive

Germany : average car velocity included "stop&go": 56 Km/h ( source: ADAC)

                                                           Appropriate Technology :

When we equip the low-e drive with power saving electric motors and " in situ=in e-car power plant" we do not need neither  on-/off-shore wind or-solar farming nor distribution net-grid : off-grid economy

Low-e drive 2 KWh/100 - 75% average e- power saving electric motor : 0,5 KWh/100 Km =
                                              small insitu e-plant need
There is not a physical barrier, not a technical barrier : only " habit change" = huge  ::) problem

                                               ccw/cw - view, before/after- view

Autark/autonomous living Technology on 4-wheels :
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.n-tv.de%2Fauto%2FEin-kleines-Haus-auf-Raedern-article21246422.html
                                                        "mobile glamping"

lancaIV

https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Transport/Vehicle-abundance
vehicles per sqkm ( 2001 ! statistic numbers )
From 1-10 cars/sqkm syn-/ gas/fuel from renewable  biomass is the national solution : < 0,5% land area need

Above these numbers and density related :
nations with coast : oceanic hydrogen/ethanol; oceanic plastics to gas/fuel

nations with large forests : wood-/gas/fuel
nations with mineral deposits ( for example earth rock= granite ): synthetic mineral ( non carbon) fuel

1 sqkm = 100 ha

1%=1 ha ~ 22500 Lt.  Bio-Synfuel a 9 KWh/Lt.

6 Lt./100 Km   Diesel/Benzin( gasoil/gasoline)  ~ 7 Lt./100 Km  Bio-Synfuel

12500 Km per car/annum a 7 Lt. /100 Km = 875 Lt. per car/annum
1 ha ~ 22500 Lt. / 875 Lt.  ~ 25 cars/ha
If Granstroi fuel crack Reformer also effective with Bio-Synfuel :25 cars x 8 ( crack-factor)  = 200 cars/ 1 ha Bio-Crack-fuel

1% national land use  if 200 cars/ sqkm density.

Nations with 20 cars/sqkm density:  1 pro/ per mille =  1/1000 land use for "car fueling".


Nations with sand deserts : Silan- Proces
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.minotech.de%2Fforschung%2Falternative-treibstoffe%2Fpeter-plichta-benzin-aus-sand%2F%3Fmobile%3D1


Something for develop and introduce to market :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Pierre+chambrin&IN=&CPC=&IC=
Special importance : Chambrins Calorie multiplier :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=ZA&NR=8203054B&KC=B&FT=D&ND=3&date=19830330&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

lancaIV

The industrial "solar cell lifetime" definition  by percentual power drop :

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://actamont.tuke.sk/pdf/2017/n3/4strachala.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiWrM-ukLfkAhUL6OAKHdxsDacQFjAOegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw0d86T99B8YlbTxQHO468uk

I have to correct my "Technical Standart" ( Laboratory development)  solar cells power density related :
when commercial solar panels are in the 16 Wp/ Kg range

the M.I.T. development 6 Wp/gram :

https://newatlas.com/lightest-thinnest-solar-cells-mit/42092/

now as new benchmark to notice :
https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/renewables/ultrathin-solar-cells-for-lightweight-and-flexible-applications-
the "Johannes Keppler University Linz" publicated 2015  : 120 Wp/5,2 grams ~ 23 Wp/gram =
                                                                       
                                                                             23 KWp/Kg solar cell

https://www.swiftsolar.com/  " ... can achieve unmatched power-to-weight ratios......"
https://flisom.com/  world-record for roll-to-roll productable cell foils : 20,4%
                                                                                Comparison :
A.  ptw-ratio   B. conversion efficiency     C.lifetime warranty     D.costs per gram solar cell

Market Target  to match :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=11&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19860304&CC=US&NR=4574161A&KC=A#

  1 USD/sqm production costs cell with (75%x75%=) 56,25 % efficiency tandem solar/ artificial light conversion
                                               
                                                  <       0,01USD/Wp

lancaIV

703 cm3 generator volume and ~ 5 Kg Material weight
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8847720B2/en
power output by  400 Hz  cycling:          60,7 Kva/h.              Power-to-weight ratio                   12 Kva/Kg

                             3000 Hz.            :         460,8  Kva/h.                                                                     92  Kva/Kg

                              780 KHz.          :          119,7.Mva/h.                                                                     24 Mva/Kg

The same generator with different power-to-weight ratios : ergo no Wp/€ or Wp/US$ but gram/€ or gram/US$ will be the correct value estimation for the selling price  !
                            250 US$/Kg and 3 KHz cycling ~ 92 Kva/250 US$ ~ 388 va/1 US$ ~ 1 va/  0,003 US$
                                                   and 780 KHz.        ~ 24 Mva/250 US$ ~ 96 Kva/1 US$ ~ 1 va/(1/96000) US$


100 times more powerful, but 1000 times much cheaper than traditional solar cells :
https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-ferrite-solar-cell-japan-20110920/
ferrit cell lifetime, market entry ? Wp/US$ and gram/US$ ratio  ?


https://web.archive.org/web/20120722061149/prismnet.com/~frg/
MEMS-TAR : 600 W heat electric conversion efficiency( 45%) per sqm by solar light max.
                        but up to 10 Wp/cm2 by concentrated solar light and MEMS-TAR cooling
                       1 Wp/25 cents MEMS-TAR price ~ ( 1 sqm= 10000 cm2/600Wp= ) 16,66 cm2/25 cents
                       (10 Wp/cm2  x 16,66)/25 cents ~ 166 Wp/25 cents + cooling system costs

We do not know how deep the prices for electricity 2030 will be,  but we know several previews. !

lancaIV

Commercial solar panel ( from cell to Modul to panel)  : 16 Wp/ Kg by average 15% efficiency
Keppler Uni Linz "thin solar foil".                                         : 23000 Wp/Kg by  average. ? efficiency

1400 KWh natural solarlight x 0,15 (~ 200 Wp/sqm) conversion factor = 210 KWh DC electricity per year

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19900201&CC=DE&NR=3817730A1&KC=A1#
70 Watt( 80': 5,25% efficiency) - 35 electric Watt ( 2019: 25 Watt CFL or less LED) = 35 Watt per hour x 8766 =                                                                     
                                                                    306,8 KWh net DC

306,8 KWh /70 Wp ~ 4,38 KWh/Wp/a artificial light chamber/tube
210 KWh/200 Wp ~ 1,05 KWh/Wp/a commercial solar panel

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=De&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Paul+marzahn&IN=&CPC=&IC=
He (R. I. P.)  used the Bernd Koehler artificial light principle but optimized it by mirrors and multiple CFL :5x 70 Wp solar cells( 5,25% eff.) and 12 x 13 W CFL (2019 : 9 W CFL or less W LED)

650 W output by 156 W input ~ 500 W per hour x 8766 = 4383 KWh /350 Wp = 12,5 KWh/Wp

Calculation resume :
12,5 KWh/Wp divided with actual 1,05 KWh/Wp timed 23000 Wp/Kg divided by comercial 16 Wp/Kg :           material use optimizing factor and market prices deflationator : > 17000 / 1

Attention : Marzahn 5,25% cells
Newer similar patent publication has been : Menendez Baquero from Spain with
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20100615&CC=ES&NR=2341161A1&KC=A1#
  8 panels( without mirrors ) a     ( 240 Wp/1,8 sqm)/1333 Wp solar ( orbital) konstante =                                                                                           
                                                                  10% efficiency solar panel


Keppler Uni + perfect Marzahn lightelectric chamber :

25000 times better performance per gram lightelectric conversion
When they wrote about " 100 times more powerful/1000 times cheaper"
https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-ferrite-solar-cell-japan-20110920/                                 

if now as new benchmark :" 25000 times more powerful/ ? times cheaper"  ::)
From the " market price deflationator : 17000/1" something between

                                                      17/1 and 170/1 at first to 1700/1 later
                  0,01 US$ per Watt peak permanent artificial photoelectric in-house conversion  endconsumer price

                     thin foil cell lifetime ? Alvin Marks Lumilight cell : 1/2 year !

"perfect Marzahn chamber": CFL input controler
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19920714&CC=US&NR=5130608A&KC=A#
Compact Fluorescant Lamp Peak Watt-lumen/ Average Watt-lumen and the effect during photoelectric conversion. !
                     
Solar cell/thin foil converter Material " recombination time window" !