New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

[TinselKoala]

Oh come on. She didn't "make a mistake", she carried on a multi-year campaign of deliberate deception and insult. Disinformation of the grandest order. And she will be continuing.

She misrepresented the schematic, she lied about the conditions under which the data was collected. She asked people to replicate her results but she lied about the schematic! This is documented and admitted by her, see the images above. Not a "mistake" ! Further, when plausible "mistakes" have been pointed out to her in the past she simply ignores the issues or denies they exist.

And you can click on any link to her papers anywhere, and what do you find? The unaltered papers, with no "preface" statement, with the Figure 3 scopeshot still there.... there is no prominent posting of this on her forum, it's buried in a "troll" thread, and you don't even see this "withdrawal statement" on the main Ainslie pages of PESN, it is only, apparently, buried there in the blog.

[TinselKoala]

TK, the Ainslie thing has produced a reference for proper circuit testing techniques, and you and others have the errors well documented for anyone to see.

She clearly doesn't want to give up hope, to the point that she'll leave up faulty meaningless 'proof' forever, and will insult and/or slander anyone who gets in her way.

It's not your problem, it's hers.

It's her problem and it's Donovan Martin's problem too, since he really should know better than to have his name on a paper that contains the fabricated Figure 3 scopeshot and the claims made about it.

[happyfunball]

Like it has already been stated on record, Rose has made this public statement : "In June and August 2013, demonstration experiments were undertaken in an effort to reproduce the experiments and results reported in this paper. As we are unable to replicate our earlier reported results, we respectfully withdraw this paper in both of its parts."

She is big enough to admit she was wrong in the above public statement at pesn.com.  I must commend her for her actions in accordance.  Let it go PEOPLE!

She has made a mistake.  We have all made mistakes.  Let he who is without a single error in life cast the first capacitor!

OM

They weren't mistakes. They were years long refusals to use proper testing procedures. She's only withdrawn the paper on the grounds that it doesn't support the 'variation' of the circuit she used to test her thesis. It's a preposterous statement, since there are no known 'variations' of any circuit which support her claims. If you read the pesn email, you'll note her refusal to withdraw her thesis. It is over, but not for Rosemary.

[happyfunball]

It's her problem and it's Donovan Martin's problem too, since he really should know better than to have his name on a paper that contains the fabricated Figure 3 scopeshot and the claims made about it.

I'm guessing he knows better now.

[OscarMeyer]

...and you don't even see this "withdrawal statement" on the main Ainslie pages of PESN, it is only, apparently, buried there in the blog.

I'm sorry but it is right on the main PESN.COM page:
Ainslie's Recent Test Does Not Confirm 2002 Thesis - "In June and August 2013, demonstration experiments were undertaken in an effort to reproduce the experiments and results reported in this paper. As we are unable to replicate our earlier reported results, we respectfully withdraw this paper in both of its parts."
LINK:  pesn.com