New Perm Mag Engine Design 1.5 : 1 Ratio (work from magnets)

[Floor]

Here is the PDF version


                      floor

[Floor]

More measurements, there is perhaps one more set needed.

The graphical representations are not done for these last sets.

please find attached 3 jpeg files


                                         Cheers
                                                floor

[conradelektro]

@Floor:

The measurements are very nicely done, great. You are close to calculate the total work.


W1 = work necessary to move the "sliding magnet" towards the "rotating magnet", both magnets are in the horizontal position, movement starts from the point where the two magnets are farthest apart and ends when the magnets almost touch

W2 = work necessary to turn the "rotating magnet" from a vertical position to a horizontal position, the "sliding magnet" is very close to the "rotating magnet", the movement is a 90° turn of the "rotating magnet"

W3 = work necessary to move the "sliding magnet" towards the "rotating magnet", the "rotating magnet" is in the vertical position and the "sliding magnet" is in the horizontal position, movement starts from the point where the two magnets are farthest apart and ends when the magnets almost touch

W4 = work necessary to turn the "rotating magnet" from a horizontal position to a vertical position, the "sliding magnet" is farthest apart from the "rotating magnet", the movement is a 90° turn of the "rotating magnet"


Power stroke: W1

Recovery stroke: W2 + W3 + W4


I think I do not have to redo your graphs, they look o.k.

A question: Let's assume the two magnets are both in the horizontal position and very close together. (One has to hold the "sliding magnet", otherwise it would want to move away. One also has to hold the "rotating magnet", other wise it would want to turn away from the horizontal position.) If you let go of the"rotating magnet", does it snap or turn back to the vertical position completely by itself (without manual intervention)?


Greetings, Conrad

[Floor]

@conradelektro

Yes, under those conditions RO snaps back.

Also RO tends to snap back when the magnets are separated.
Also SL  tends to return to close proximity to RO even when RO is at 90 degrees off.

Here are the "little graphs" and an over lay of all the graphs.

[Floor]

The force imbalance is reverse of what I had projected ?

After all calculations,  corrections and reviews are complete, I am willing to loan the
TD unit to you, if you wish, and if you will pay for shipping both ways.


                         Cheers
                               floor