Self accelerating reed switch magnet spinner.

[synchro1]

Synchro1:

That Igor clip unfortunately is a total bust.  No self running visible.  He thinks that the current is reversing and that's not the case.  It's a really bad mistake.  The LED lights up.  So either he has it backwards in his schematic or the LED really does light up when it gets a "coil fry" when the coil pushes current through the reversed-biased LED.  There is no battery recharging at all during the cycle, only discharging.

If you link to a clip that shows a serious attempt to show OU I will let you know.  That means they have to make real measurements, not just play "show and tell."

MileHigh

Yet another inane pontification from the improver who built a gas tank into my "Synchro coil"!

[MileHigh]

Attack of the Know-it-Alls!  lol

http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi179831065/?ref_=tt_ov_vi

[synchro1]

Attack of the Know-it-Alls!  lol

http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi179831065/?ref_=tt_ov_vi

@Milehigh,


This video's not available in my country.


Current can only flow in one direction through an LED from anode to cathode. You'll notice that Igor has the cathode, or negative pole of the LED connected to the positive pole of his battery. Power can only flow in one direction here, from the coil into the battery, from the coil's back spike. Igor maintains he ran the spinner for six hours with no drop in input battery voltage. I guarantee you the battery voltage would go down noticeably if he disconnected the LED from the battery!


Take a look at his charge video:


How do explain the reading on his multi meter showing a charge increase on the charge battery if no current gets past the diode? That's just absurd to pretend the charge is imaginary!!

[Farmhand]

Synchro no current is measured in that video so no input/output power figures are known or shown, therefore no conclusion can be based on that. Atteh end he shows the output from one motor is just enough to run the other motor but there is no charging of the battery. No OU there.

..

[Magluvin]

Current can only flow in one direction through an LED from anode to cathode. You'll notice that Igor has the cathode, or negative pole of the LED connected to the positive pole of his battery. Power can only flow in one direction here, from the coil into the battery, from the coil's back spike. Igor maintains he ran the spinner for six hours with no drop in input battery voltage. I guarantee you the battery voltage would go down noticeably if he disconnected the LED from the battery!

I have found similarly that coil field collapse can happen in forward direction 'or' backwards.

From what is known, when we switch on dc to a coil then switch off, the field collapse causes more forward current from the coil. But what I had found a couple years ago was that if there is no where for that forward collapse current to go in the forward direction, then the field collapse charges the coils self capacitance to peak, and that stored voltage bounces back through the coil causing a reverse current and field.

I call it field collapse because Back/Reverse emf doesnt really apply during initial field collapse because the resulting current is forward and has nothing to do with a field collapsing on the coil that made it. BEMF has everything to do with impedance of a coil. The gradual field building of an inductor is due to Reverse emf due to currents building in the coils windings, which all the windings are inducing all the others at the same time and the induced windings want to push current in the opposite direction.

The only thing I can figure about how coils do what they do is because of resistance. Due to resistance, the voltage/current applied to the coil will always supercede the back/reverse emf and the input will eventually win the battle of fighting the bemf till the bemf does not exist and current from the input gets to its maximum due to resistance.

Soo, if the coil were super conducting, zero resistance, I believe the coil would not pass current at all as the bemf should be equal to the input, like the magnet floating on a super cooled super conductor.

I see Igor is using a single cell battery voltage of 1.3v.  That is key to what he is doing. If the input is higher, then there is a chance that the voltage potential developed by the coil collapse could be high enough to breach the gap in the read switch(spark). Reeds are pretty good at fast switching mechanically. Quick to close and open the distance between contacts. So the quicker the reed springs to its fully open position, the less chance of the collapse current from jumping the contacts.

On can easily get higher than input voltages from a coil collapse into a cap using a diode, WITH THE DIODE IN EITHER DIRECTION.      In one direction, when the reed is closed sending power to the coil, the diode does not conduct until the coil collapse. With the diode in the other direction, source current does flow to the cap and coil, but when the coil collapses, the cap gets just about as much HV as it did with the diode the traditional way.  This was when I discovered that the collapse can develop currents in either direction, depending on a way out for those currents. If there is no way out, then the collapse currents will die off within the coil in the form of oscillation within the coils LC. This isolated oscillation within the coil is at its resonant freq, whether it be 4mhz or 100hz depending on the coil and its self capacitance.


Possibly this is what Tesla switching is all about. Using a high speed rotor, the closing of the contacts, then the opening and creating distance very quickly and collapse currents dont have a chance to breach the gap. Just thoughts.


Mags