Building a self looping "SMOT"

[LibreEnergia]

LibreEnergia said
"As I've said before, these devices work better without magnets."

Is this just a hollow statement or do you have facts and numbers to back
it up?..

I can't be bothered making a device but here is a simple experiment you could try at home.

1. Create a circular track that is low friction and completely flat.
2. Place a ball on the track and give it a little kinetic energy by pushing it by hand.
3. With luck, the ball should do at least 2 or 3 rotations before coming to rest.

That's at least one more rotation than any SMOT has achieved using the same energy source.
Happy experimenting.

[happyfunball]

I was referring to this video http://www.overunity.com/13879/building-a-self-looping-smot/dlattach/attach/128652/

and no, I was not hallucinating.

Ah, so you selectively ignore the first video because it contradicts your diatribe.

Got it.

[LibreEnergia]

Ah, so you selectively ignore the first video because it contradicts your diatribe.

Got it.

if you'd read the thread you would see I have already posted my observations about the first video.

It does not show anything of interest from an over-unity perspective.

[MeggerMan]

Hi Elecar,
The post #174 shows the ball going in the anti-clockwise direction and enters the magnet array in the middle.
In the original early drawings the arrows indicate the ball enters the ramp clock-wise from the lower end of the magnet array.


Is the replication for Normal using a clockwise run into the middle of the array but your working model uses an anti-clockwise run into the lower end of the array?


I am confused?


If it is meant to run anti-clockwise into the array centre then all my tests so far have been done wrongly.


Meggerman

[happyfunball]

if you'd read the thread you would see I have already posted my observations about the first video.

It does not show anything of interest from an over-unity perspective.

Elecar is not claiming it shows OU. What part of that is difficult to understand