Building a self looping "SMOT"

[LibreEnergia]

@LibreEnergia: Thank you for your hard work, however it turns out.

Just for the record: Are you my minion? Am I yours? Do you have any minions at all? Do we know each other, other than our contact on this forum? Do we exchange PMs in secret, chatting behind the backs of the other forum members, plotting how we will suppress Free Energy and serve the interests of Big Oil? Do you have a sponsor who pays you well to post here?

And for the record: No, we don't know each other, have even corresponded directly before or have anything resembling minions.

I'm not in the business of supressing free energy and don't serve the interests of Big Oil, or anyone but myself for that matter.

I'd dearly like to see free energy succeed but I know enough about physics and engineering to be reasonably certain that attempts to use gravity and magnetism in the way suggested by the author of this thread or many other posters on this forum is futile.

I don't have any sponsors who pay me to post here, although I occasionally do it on work time and using my employers bandwidth. (I'm employed as a software consultant by a company with no interests in energy production)

[happyfunball]

He claimed to have a self-looping SMOT or smot-like thing that ran for three hours without outside input of energy. That is definitely a claim of OU. He presented a video, definitely claiming to show OU, to LibreEnergia that might be fake. He presented a video here that shows two storages of energy provided by his hands, and yet doesn't manage to make a second loop.

You don't like my video? Why? I freely admit that the cheese doesn't do anything. Did you think it did? Can you provide any kind of rational analysis of my video that refutes anything I've said about it?

Yet my thing makes more than two complete loops, something elecar told us we had never seen before. My "cheese wheel" is neither sarcastic nor unnecessary: it refutes several claims of elecar's and shows how to avoid several questionable "errors" in his video (the one I analyzed; I haven't seen the one LibreEnergia analyzed.)

Can you discuss matters rationally or would you just like to continue insulting me? I think I already know the answer to that, but feel free to demonstrate that I am wrong ... about anything. Of course insulting me is a lot easier.


@LibreEnergia: Thank you for your hard work, however it turns out.

Just for the record: Are you my minion? Am I yours? Do you have any minions at all? Do we know each other, other than our contact on this forum? Do we exchange PMs in secret, chatting behind the backs of the other forum members, plotting how we will suppress Free Energy and serve the interests of Big Oil? Do you have a sponsor who pays you well to post here?

Pretty funny, you conveniently ignore the fact that he doesn't claim to show OU in the video he posted, yet you in your infinite megalomania felt the need to replicate it to prove he didn't show what he said himself he didn't show.

[LibreEnergia]

Pretty funny, you conveniently ignore the fact that he doesn't claim to show OU in the video he posted, yet you in your infinite megalomania felt the need to replicate it to prove he didn't show what he said himself he didn't show.

If the ball is started without an excess of either  gravitational potential or kinetic energy, it returns to the same starting energy state each loop and it can loop even once then it is "over-unity". He doesn't need to claim it  , just describing something that could do that is over-unity by definition.

[sarkeizen]

just short-circuit the thing for 3 weeks man.

@EOA Does that demonstrate it will last forever?  Nope.  So again, what test demonstrates running forever?

[TinselKoala]

Pretty funny, you conveniently ignore the fact that he doesn't claim to show OU in the video he posted, yet you in your infinite megalomania felt the need to replicate it to prove he didn't show what he said himself he didn't show.

Thank you for proving my point so succinctly. You cannot find anything wrong with my video or my analysis of his video, and you cannot discuss rationally the real issues, so you choose to insult me instead.