Work from two magnets > 19 % output

[tinman]

Well machineing shims to a tolerance of 1 micron is no great feat these day's. so if it came to the nitty gritty,it could be done-until you get a good temp change in the system-then all bets are off.

I dont think a magnetic field is going to change much over 1 microm though,so near enough would be good enough lol.
When it comes to perminant magnet's,nothing would supprise me.
I have just built a coil that outputs DC only,regardles of the input.
By useing PM's in the right configuration,we get only a DC output,without rectifiers.

Fancy that- PM's as rectifiers.
Now thats pretty useful.

[Floor]

So for the record.

TK

The distance measurements are calculated as 1/4 of the circumference of the pulleys.  The calculator I use puts out a lot higher precision than is in any way meaningful under the conditions of this experiment.    Use of the very long and/or repeating decimals,  I usually let these stay within the calculator.  If a calculation comes out to 4 or 5 decimal points I may use it intact.

Please find all of the errors in the procedures, math, graphs etc. you wish to.  That is why the experiment has been posted here.  But lets let a bean counter, work out the grammar and punctuation errors at a later time.

Thanks for the input.

                           floor

[Floor]

              Fresh start

           Let the debates continue



                    cheers
                      floor

[TinselKoala]

You've made my point!  Your anal retentiveness precludes learning opportunities because you are JADED.  So jaded in fact, that you really seem to believe that a measurement unit mistake of 1/10,000th of an inch vs. 1/10,000th of a millimeter on a wooden model could be an overunity deal breaker.  Of course you didn't even make it far enough to see the model, or investigate the concept as you abandoned the story with prejudice well beforehand.  Of course that's what you get for popping your head in to a topic merely to make sure it still rattles.

Tsk, tsk...

How unscientific.....or should I have said, how very establishment scientific of you...

The Hubble telescope supposedly went up with a costly unit measurement communication mistake.  With you pioneering the team, it wouldn't have gone up at all. 






TS

Wrong, my friend. Had there been someone "anal" like me checking the work, the mistake in focus would have been caught and corrected before launch, saving many millions of dollars and months of time.

Just so you  know, in two previous jobs I've had in the "free energy" field, my care and caution and skepticism has indeed saved nearly three million dollars that would have been spent on bogus "research" had I not caught errors and bitched about them.



The issue of what to do with all those extra digits that a calculator spits out is a known one with a clear and straight forward solution. It is simply this: Any answer that you get CANNOT be more precise than the LEAST precise figure that goes into the calculation. This is the issue of _significant digits_. When there is a physical measurement concerned, this is especially important.

When I see a result with more than the legitimate number of "sig digs" I know this right away: it is wrong.  It might be close to being correct... but as the Hubble experience shows, close is not good enough.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significant_figures

So you are asking me to accept some kind of advanced discussion when the person engaging in the discussion is ignoring a basic, widely accepted and taught, fundamental principle of arithmetic. What else is that person ignoring? Stuff that I can't catch because of my own ignorance, that will lead me astray and bite me later on, like the Hubble bit its designers?

Please, people, let us try to get the basic, undisputable stuff right, before we start dealing with the more speculative advanced concepts.

[TinselKoala]

So for the record.

TK

The distance measurements are calculated as 1/4 of the circumference of the pulleys.  The calculator I use puts out a lot higher precision than is in any way meaningful under the conditions of this experiment.    Use of the very long and/or repeating decimals,  I usually let these stay within the calculator.  If a calculation comes out to 4 or 5 decimal points I may use it intact.

Please find all of the errors in the procedures, math, graphs etc. you wish to.  That is why the experiment has been posted here.  But lets let a bean counter, work out the grammar and punctuation errors at a later time.

Thanks for the input.

                           floor

And thank you for your reasonable response. Please see my answer above; you can determine the correct number of decimal places to use very easily.

Some of us remember Mylow, showing videos where he is measuring magnet positions to the "hundredth of a millimeter" using a digital caliper, telling people they had to be that accurate ... then placing them on a disk and gluing them down by hand. LOL!