Parallel Core Generator

[phoneboy]

With regard to the naudin ref, isn't that center peak due to the field collapsing? If so, what if you had coils on each side of the magnet connected with diodes so they short circuit the induced current (low peaks) and only collected the field collapse.  Probably wouldn't slow down the motor that much??

[d3x0r]

With regard to the naudin ref, isn't that center peak due to the field collapsing? If so, what if you had coils on each side of the magnet connected with diodes so they short circuit the induced current (low peaks) and only collected the field collapse.  Probably wouldn't slow down the motor that much??

I think more the point is to note that there's a longer, less intense pull on both sides of the peek, so rather than having two symmetrical peeks you have a long low dip and a short up dip....

[SeaMonkey]

There may be a more effective way to
hopefully overcome the Lenz Effect in
electromagnetic dynamos.

Since conventional dynamos make use
of either rotating coils in a stationary
magnetic field or rotating magnets acting
upon stationary coils the Lenz Effect is
very pronounced.

If a dynamo was constructed with stationary
permanent magnets and stationary output
coils and a rotor assembly which simply diverts
the magnetic polarity to the coils in an
alternating fashion the Lenz Effect should be
greatly reduced or minimized.

How can such a device be constructed in order
to accomplish this?  And with what sort of
materials in order to avoid induced eddy current
losses?

It would be similar to the MEG in principle with
the exception that it would be mechanical and
would have "Motion" in the rotating magnetic
diverter assembly.

It should be possible with careful design and
fabrication to put together a device which
will output more electrical energy than that
which would be necessary to rotate the diverter.

Any ideas?

[forest]

Yes SeaMonkey. It will work just fine.

[bistander]

Yes SeaMonkey. It will work just fine.

It takes nearly 7 years to reply to SeaMonkey!

In regards to SeaMonkey's idea, it sounds like a Lundell (claw rotor) alternator would fit the bill. I believe you can alter it to keep the field coil stationary thereby having only the iron (claw) rotor rotating. It'd require mechanical redesign obviously. Then I doubt it will yield desired results, but you never know what might develop out of the experiment.

Regards,
bi