Electric Motor Geenerator/alternator looped

[tim123]

This is an interesting link - in russian:
http://nshb.at.ua/load/svobodnaja_ehnergija/rezonansnyj_usilitel_moshhnosti_stepanova/21-1-0-589

Posted by wings on the Luc Reactive thread here:
http://www.overunity.com/14106/reactive-power-reactive-generator-research-from-gotoluc-discussion-thread/msg380409/#msg380409

Ignoring the hilarious mistranslation by google translate on the second line, the article is quite interesting, if a little hard to follow...

[Grimer]

Hi Vince,
  thanks for the full reply. It's much appreciated. You did give it a fair go...

I'm not sure what to make of Luc's reactive work. He initially presented it as a working circuit that delivered OU, but seems to have backtracked... It looks like he was making some measurement errors. Other than that - who knows...

I did see the video you referred to... It was interesting, and you're right about the fact that there can be no reaction on the source. I was taught that there's an electrical analog for all machines. So what would the analog of this be i wonder?

It's something I'd like to try one day. Centrifugal pumps are extremely efficient, and so is a pelton wheel...

I have a theory about OU - that spiralling fluids can convert energy from otherwise inaccessible sources. An example would be a tornado / whirlwind converting heat into velocity. Which I understand they do.

Another example would be eddy currents creating anomalous extra heating, or even causing nuclear fusion, by entraining other particles as they spiral inwards.

I can't apply it to this thread though...

You might be interested in Bruce's uncle's toy. An example of Overunity being unwittingly achieved.


I'll dig out the details from BesslerWheel.com
===============================


Found it.


http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=118919#118919


You will notice it's also got a comment from a bod whose into electrics like you. ;-)

[TinselKoala]

Oh come on Frank. You are citing a third party's report of a device that someone showed to an eight year old child, many years ago.

He had an uncle who liked to arrange, to invent. One day, old Bruce of seven or eight years, returned visit to the uncle who showed to the grandfather the new play that it had made for his children (it had six of them).

Of course, like all such devices, it is no longer available for inspection, and there exists no further information or evidence of its performance other than the report of an eight year old child, filtered through at least one other party.

Its descendants do not know any more what became this play, it is probable that the uncle in recovered the parts as it was its practice to rebuild another thing, unless it does not sleep yet in an old farm, in dust... They do not remember either to have seen other apparatuses functioning in an autonomous way, nor of engine on the play, but know that the play had stopped afterwards weeks and simply set out again after being cleaned.

[/color][/color]Your standard of evidence is very deficient if you think that is evidence of anything at all other than an uncle's playing with some children.

[Grimer]

Oh come on Frank. You are citing a third party's report of a device that someone showed to an eight year old child, many years ago.

Of course, like all such devices, it is no longer available for inspection, and there exists no further information or evidence of its performance other than the report of an eight year old child, filtered through at least one other party.


Your standard of evidence is very deficient if you think that is evidence of anything at all other than an uncle's playing with some children.

I am.


And people buy lottery tickets.
I suppose you think they're stupid.

[TinselKoala]

I am.


And people buy lottery tickets.
I suppose you think they're stupid.

Just the ones who _don't_ win!

(They don't call the lottery a "tax on the poor" for no reason.)