Thread for naysayers, nitpickers, and shills

[ramset]

I suppose The real question is


Are the observations presented by the experimenter in line with common magnetic theory
or do they Highlight some " New Knowledge" and help support Kens Claims.


?
Thx
Chet

[MarkE]

I don't see anything in the demonstration that requires new theory to explain the observations.  The presenter is free to construct an argument that conventional theory  would not allow for the observed behavior.

[Cap-Z-ro]

If this is a pledge to drop the unfounded allegations and abusive personal attacks, then I am happy to clean the slate.

The implication being that I, for no apparent reason just began making..."unfounded allegations and abusive personal attacks".

When nothing could be farther from the truth.

The reality is that I politely made numerous respectful requests to certain members that they refrain from entering threads, making discouraging negative remarks, which derailed thread after thread, preventing an open exchange of ideas and many experiments which could have led to other discoveries inadvertaintly...as is often the case historically.

I was totally ignored by the offenders...and when I pointed out that in the interest of paid trolls and shills to disrupt potentially fruitful dialogue, guess what, it was I who was attacked.

Thats when the Sh!t hit the turbine.

I would like to see real progress instead of repetitive the negativity and ridicule which was permeating this forum and none of us anywhere.

I was called a coward for making comments from behind nom de plume.

Well, we all saw what happened to Theo/Ken when he made his name known don't we ?

Yes, his name was googled Tinsel K and linked to someone with similar name and a criminal background...the implication being that Theo/Ken was a criminal, in order to destroy his credibility.

No thanks, but I'll pass on that invite.


And an additional reference to me:

"Cap seems to be calming down. "


The implication being that it was I who was in an agitated state.

Well, I believe the intelligence of the readership is being seriously underestimated here, and they know the difference.

Regards...

[ramset]

Mark E
thank you for the response


Chet

[MarkE]

The implication being that I, for no apparent reason just began making..."unfounded allegations and abusive personal attacks".

When nothing could be farther from the truth.

No implication, it was a direct statement of fact.  You have accused people of being paid agents and when asked for evidence offered none.  You have issued attacks using vulgar and abusive language against others.   One need only scroll back a couple of messages for direct examples. 

The reality is that I politely made numerous respectful requests to certain members that they refrain from entering threads, making discouraging negative remarks, which derailed thread after thread, preventing an open exchange of ideas and many experiments which could have led to other discoveries inadvertaintly...as is often the case historically.

Scroll back a couple of posts.  There is nothing polite about those vulgar tirades of yours.

I was totally ignored by the offenders...and when I pointed out that in the interest of paid trolls and shills to disrupt potentially fruitful dialogue, guess what, it was I who was attacked.

I ask again:  Kindly show evidence that anyone here is a "paid troll" or "paid shill".  Kindly show where I have attacked you, or acted in anyway deserving of the invective that you have thrown my way.

Thats when the Sh!t hit the turbine.

I would like to see real progress instead of repetitive the negativity and ridicule which was permeating this forum and none of us anywhere.

I was called a coward for making comments from behind nom de plume.

Perhaps someone did call you names.  Are you not an adult in control of your faculties?  What justifies the false accusations and vulgar invective that you chose to spew?

Well, we all saw what happened to Theo/Ken when he made his name known don't we ?

I didn't, but there are plenty of crass people all over the internet with poor impulse control who do mean and even illegal things to people when they get a hold of their personal information.

Yes, his name was googled Tinsel K and linked to someone with similar name and a criminal background...the implication being that Theo/Ken was a criminal, in order to destroy his credibility.

That does not sound like TinselKoala to me.  Do you have a link?

No thanks, but I'll pass on that invite.

That's really unfortunate for you.  Only you can decide whether you are going to conduct yourself as a responsible adult or not.

And an additional reference to me:

"Cap seems to be calming down. "


The implication being that it was I who was in an agitated state.

If swearing at others and falsely accusing others of being paid agents is not a sign of agitation, then what is?  If the abuse you've dealt out is something you have done out of cold calculation, then I suggest that you have no place among adults.

Well, I believe the intelligence of the readership is being seriously underestimated here, and they know the difference.

Regards...

I suggest that you have let your emotions run away with you.  You have made false accusations against me, sworn at me, and all without provocation.  You stated that you mirror what is dealt to you.  By your recent examples, and this post of yours you show that is simply not true.  If you choose to calm down and conduct yourself as an adult then for my part bygones will be bygones.  If you insist on throwing temper tantrums, and making false accusations, then it is your reputation that you hurt.