Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 44 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: camelherder49 on March 21, 2014, 10:52:05 AM
This was speaking to the point that was made earlier
about adding additional under unity processes always
causes greater losses to the overall operation.

Twist that any way you care too!
There is no twisting necessary at all.  Take the efficiency of an engine of your choice by itself.  Bolt on the transmission of your choice.  Then measure the result.  It is always lower than the efficiency of either the engine or the transmission alone.  The reason is simple:  The product of any two numbers between zero and one is always less than each of those numbers.  Why does that surprise you?  Why do you think that comes under challenge with a CVT?

mrwayne

Quote from: MarkE on March 21, 2014, 10:00:55 AM
This completely apples and oranges comparison is instructive:  A CVT does not make an automobile over unity.  Neither do the losses of the Nested Russian Dolls of Ignorance improve the efficiency of anything other than Wayne and company's ability to suck money out of the wallets of gullible investors.

Mark,

Insults toward those that have evaluated the full Zed process - from one who won't....

8) 8) 8)

Wayne

camelherder49

Quote from: MarkE on March 21, 2014, 11:24:25 AM
There is no twisting necessary at all.  Take the efficiency of an engine of your choice by itself.  Bolt on the transmission of your choice.  Then measure the result.  It is always lower than the efficiency of either the engine or the transmission alone.  The reason is simple:  The product of any two numbers between zero and one is always less than each of those numbers.  Why does that surprise you?  Why do you think that comes under challenge with a CVT?

camelherder49

Twisting was very necessary to you. You commented on my earlier
post without answering what the subject was. It was a direct
question that had nothing to do with your twisted answer and
I re-read my post and could find nothing about CVT anywhere.

One more time : multiple under unity processes joining together
to get positive speed increases and positive fuel efficiency.

MarkE

Quote from: mrwayne on March 21, 2014, 11:31:02 AM
Mark,

Insults toward those that have evaluated the full Zed process - from one who won't....

8) 8) 8)

Wayne
Ah the investment funeral director speaks.  Any scientist or engineer who thinks that there is free energy to be had lifting and dropping weights is unfit for their job.  Full Stop.