Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Force is not energy. You get no breaks, unless you can prove otherwise. FORCE IS NOT ENERGY.

I can provide literally hundreds if not thousands of references for this point. Can you provide even one that says "force IS energy"?

You could help teach me.

Show me where a buoyant object lifting a load over a distance is not preforming work...

Explain how you can preform work without also describing energy.

Explain to me why the potential left in a ZED after performing work - can not be used to perform more work, or described as potential.

Thanks

[minnie]

    Webby,
              looks as if you're winning this time, good luck!
                              John.

[TinselKoala]

You could help teach me.

Show me where a buoyant object lifting a load over a distance is not preforming work...

Explain how you can preform work without also describing energy.

Explain to me why the potential left in a ZED after performing work - can not be used to perform more work, or described as potential.

Thanks

You still don't get it!

Now, read very carefully.

YOU, honest Wayne Travis, are the one making claims. NOT ME.

Therefore, it is YOUR responsibility to provide evidence FOR those claims.

The only thing I need to "explain" is that you have NOT provided that evidence.

The fact that I point out the continuing string of ridiculous statements you emit is optional on my part. However, I don't mind doing it as a favor to you. And I'll point you to an excellent basic engineering textbook that _some of us_ have worked through at one point or another: Beer and Johnston, Statics and Dynamics: Vector Mechanics for Engineers. Everything you need to know, but don't, is explained for you in that book, with problems you can work. If you can remember any of your calculus, that is.

OK. Now let's review.

Whose responsibility it is to provide evidence FOR his claims?

Anyone? You there in back, with the silly grin, the stuffed shirt and the tight belt ..... what's that you say? WAYNE TRAVIS?

That's RIGHT, go to the head of the class.

[mrwayne]

You still don't get it!

Now, read very carefully.

YOU, honest Wayne Travis, are the one making claims. NOT ME.

Therefore, it is YOUR responsibility to provide evidence FOR those claims.

The only thing I need to "explain" is that you have NOT provided that evidence.

The fact that I point out the continuing string of ridiculous statements you emit is optional on my part. However, I don't mind doing it as a favor to you. And I'll point you to an excellent basic engineering textbook that _some of us_ have worked through at one point or another: Beer and Johnston, Statics and Dynamics: Vector Mechanics for Engineers. Everything you need to know, but don't, is explained for you in that book, with problems you can work. If you can remember any of your calculus, that is.

OK. Now let's review.

Whose responsibility it is to provide evidence FOR his claims?

Anyone? You there in back, with the silly grin, the stuffed shirt and the tight belt ..... what's that you say? WAYNE TRAVIS?

That's RIGHT, go to the head of the class.

Ok, you got me, I read real slowly and I don't have a clue what you are trying to say.

Take care

[TinselKoala]

One more time, with emphasis:

YOU, honest Wayne Travis, are the one making claims. NOT ME.

Therefore, it is YOUR responsibility to provide evidence FOR those claims.