Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[chrisC]

WITTS does not and never has had any working technology such as they have claimed. ....

You speak with incredible arrogance.
cheers,
chrisC

[MarkE]

You speak with incredible arrogance.
cheers,
chrisC

My statement is correct.  Even one time big Timothy Thrapp believer Sterling Allan has been warning people about Timothy Thrapp's scam:

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:World_Improvement_Through_The_Spirit_Ministries

"BUYER BEWARE: "I know people who have given Tim a lot of money and have never gotten anything for it." -- a pillar in the community, Sept. 5, 2012 "

The WITTS site itself is a hoot.  They claim to be responsible for most of modern technology.  If that were so then they would also be responsible for putting it into the hands to the very powers that be that they rail against. 

http://www.witts.ws/about-us/

[chrisC]

My statement is correct.

Yah, I agree. On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog...
cheers,
chrisC

[MarkE]

Here are some more thoughts about my QEG 2.0 model:

1)  Core losses and eddy current Lenz drag have been ignored, so that means core losses would show up as a reduction

I think you mean increase here.

in the power dissipation of both the primary load and primary winding.  I previously estimated core losses at around 900 watts for a CEG putting out something around 10KW, so in my test run results the total output figure would remain the same and a core loss component of about 900 watts would be added and the dissipation for both the primary load and the primary winding would both need to be scaled downward appropriately.

2)  Lenz drag due to eddy currents in the rotor would increase the input torque, at this point by an unknown about. 

I think you have worked out the magnetic field strength.  If we also know the materials, then we know the conductivity and can compute the eddy currents and resulting Lorentz forces.

3)  I now believe I employed the arbitrary inductor model improperly for the primary winding of the CEG 2.0 model.  That may be the cause of the parasitic oscillations and the unrealistic behavior.  I'll have to do some more magnetic analyses to fix that. 

It could also be that the basic behavior is right but that the numerical approximations are not accurate enough.  At least for purposes of diagnosing the problem adding series and shunt resistances as you have already started to do could provide a good deal of insight.

Pmgr:

Because the coupling coefficient of the primary to secondary goes from a maximum, estimated.95, to a minimum of zero 4 times per rotor revolution.  I suspect power transfer from the primary to the secondary will be quite poor.  Because of that I decided to extract power directly from the primary.  The expect the coupling coefficient modulation is also the source of the frequency doubling you see in the secondary of your simulation.

[MarkE]

Yah, I agree. On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog...
cheers,
chrisC

Your average canine has a lot better character than many of the charlatans out there such as Timothy Thrapp.