Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[memoryman]

centraflow, looping inside the system is meaningless wrt OU of the whole system.
The only thing that truly matters to me is: does it deliver more energy over an extended period than is supplied? Even if the system uses some type of fuel, that is fine.
E.g. a system using violation of LoT2 is of great interest to me.
As to evaluating MarkE's mentality, I have better things to do. I accept him as he is and is not. The number/frequency of posts have no intrinsic meaning.
I made a commitment to myself to make a difference in the world; that involves being active researching different energy sources. Even when I don't think that it will work, I will help others.
You an contact me via an email or message if you wish.

[gravityblock]

Look at Tuesday's posts about midday.

I looked through all of Tuesday's posts and I found no acknowledgement of a mistake on your part further in the thread, in regards to the question at hand.  I'm not chasing the wind.  Since you made the extraordinary claim of acknowledging your mistake further in the thread, then the burden of proof is on you.

Gravock

[PIH123]

I looked through all of Tuesday's posts and I found no acknowledgement of a mistake on your part further in the thread, in regards to the question at hand.  I'm not chasing the wind.  Since you made the extraordinary claim of acknowledging your mistake further in the thread, then the burden of proof is on you.

Gravock

Reply #797 on page 54.

You are questioning where he admits an error on
"Yes the mistake that I made and acknowledged further in the thread is that I failed to account for the integration.  Faster speed yields a higher di/dt, but T is proportionally smaller."


and reply 797 contains
"Actually the one thing that I overlooked is that the coil looking like a perfect inductor will identically integrate the rate of change in flux with respect to time, which should lead to a constant induction for a given magnet starting from a fixed distance.  Retracting the magnet in the opposite direction to its initial position relative to the ring reverses out whatever current was induced by bringing the magnet closer to the ring."

[MarkE]

I looked through all of Tuesday's posts and I found no acknowledgement of a mistake on your part further in the thread, in regards to the question at hand.  I'm not chasing the wind.  Since you made the extraordinary claim of acknowledging your mistake further in the thread, then the burden of proof is on you.

Gravock

There is nothing extraordinary about my statement.  It is just a simple statement of fact that you or anyone else can easily verify is true. 

[Acca]

MarkE

for as may posts that you have in such a short time and the ornate explanations that you have given to discredit QEG,  and the very long posts you have to have allot of support to do that..  So you are on who's payroll to do this ?  You seem to have run our of words for the critical review of the power generator from Spain,  are you waiting for your team to develop an answer, because you seem to have them all !!
   

You have way too much time to sit and just to do this without  compensation (MONEY)   "17 posts a day"    Who are you

Are you part of a "team of" that posts under "MarkE" 

Acca...