Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 89 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

Now supposing you have a complete sent of measurements on the QEG at different speeds and load values, and so on.  Then you add the device that hasn't been talked about much, the extra LC resonator with the spark gap. You adjust the QEG so that you are in resonance with the extra LC resonator and the sparking is regular and "satisfying."

Now go ahead and look at your power-in and power-out measurements and compare them with when you have the extra LC resonator and spark gap in the circuit.  Do you get better results?  The reality is that you will not.  The spark gap represents a resistor sucking up power and turning it into heat.  The "disruptive switching inducing some kind of 'special' response from the coils" is just a fantasy.  The coils will do exactly what they are supposed to do when in the presence of a spark gap, no more, no less.

I am assuming that the FTW team will "fall back" to the LC resonator and spark gap as "part of the tuning" as things continue along their gloomy path.  So the investigation into the addition of the extra LC resonator and spark gap is not a difficult thing to do at all.  It would all be part of sharing and open sourcing your data, be it good or bad.

MileHigh

MileHigh

Speaking of documenting yourself in the spirit of open source, this is from the Be-Do forum:

http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-general-topics/376-what-happens-when-overunity-is-achieved?start=138

QuoteHi Nigel,

We are going for full eQEG operation using the flux coil to initiate and maintain electrical resonance, and also the flux coil drive circuit is also configured for automatic self-looping, where a power bleed-off from the QEG's 12V DC o/p will supply power to the flux coil circuit. This is automatic, because as soon as sufficient o/p voltage from the eQEG is available, the lithium batteries are automatically isolated so that the flux coil is fed by eQEG power only - no manual switch over is required.

Cheers Cliff

Let's see if Cliff, a.k.a. vgray35, will document himself and share his measurements on his "no moving parts QEG."  Like I said before, Cliff talks the talk, and most of the time it is fantasy talk, so let's see if he can walk the walk.

He is discussing a self-looping thingamajig:

QuoteInitially all QFT/G testing will be done just as a standalone unit using the flux pulse coil to energize the eQEG resonant LC tank, to generate electricity through a self-looped configuration of the device. As matter of interest the flux coil could also be tested as a strictly Bi-TT configuration (i.e. no active QEG component) just to see what Bi-TT OU one achieves, but obviously the eQEG is what the focus will be. At 1100Hz the resonant capacitor will be about 1.5uF/1000V, but that will depend on the final measurement of the primary coil's inductance.

We have seen this movie before but for some reason we never see the ending of the movie.  The protagonists invariably seem to go dark.  Anybody remember "Panacea University" testing the eOrbo?

MileHigh

ACG

WITTS has their line of expert testimonials who do not demonstrate but just testify.
Its only natural FTW has its line of expert testimonials doing the same.

With both groups and both modeled after WITTs:
- Save the world.
- An MTBT of 1 hour.  Mean time between Tesla.
- Only we have the technology.
- You must think good thoughts or the machine will harm you.
- Charge copious amounts for counseling.
- Supported by their own hand picked experts.
- Working units yet not being used for their intended purpose.
- Never ending donations.
- Claim to have, be involved, or have access to large numbers of technologies.  Most of which have no association with their organization but are used to fluff up legitimacy.

ariovaldo